Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Be Careful What You Ask (or Don't Ask) For in Bankruptcy
    2020-11-19

    Bonding companies and debtors can learn an important lesson from the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Louisiana’s recent opinion on how surety bond claims are treated once a bankruptcy plan is confirmed.

    Filed under:
    USA, Louisiana, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Phelps Dunbar LLP, Bankruptcy, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Patrick "Rick" M. Shelby
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Phelps Dunbar LLP
    Fifth Circuit Issues Decision Concerning Overriding Royalty Interests and Louisiana Oil Well Lien Act Claims
    2018-05-02

    The ATP Oil & Gas Corporation bankruptcy case (Case No. 4:12-bk-36187, S.D. Texas) (“ATP”) involved the intersection of energy and bankruptcy law on a variety of issues. Most recently, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals rendered a decision arising from that case dealing with the relative rights or priorities between the holder of overriding royalty interests (“ORRI”) and parties asserting lien claims or privileges under the Louisiana Oil Well Lien Act (“LOWLA”) (La. Rev. Stat § 9:4861) in a case titled OHA Investment Corporation f/k/a NGP Capital Resources Company v.

    Filed under:
    USA, Louisiana, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, King & Spalding LLP, Bankruptcy, Fifth Circuit
    Authors:
    Edward L. Ripley
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    King & Spalding LLP
    U.S. Bankruptcy Court Relies on International Comity to Invalidate Rule B Attachments
    2016-08-31

    Relying on the principle of international comity embodied in Chapter 15 of the United States Bankruptcy Code, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Bankruptcy Court”) recently vacated Rule B attachments previously granted by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana (the “Louisiana District Court”) on the vessel M/V DAEBO TRADER (the “Vessel”) in In re DAEBO Int

    Filed under:
    USA, Louisiana, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads LLP, US District Court for the Southern District of New York
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads LLP
    Tinkering With Ipso Facto Provisions In Financial Contracts Could Send Them Sailing Out of Safe Harbors
    2016-07-28

    The scope of the Bankruptcy Code’s safe harbor for certain financial contracts has been tested again, this time in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Louisiana. The question this time was whether an ipso facto provision continues to be safe harbored if enforcement of that provision is conditioned on other factors – in this case, the debtor’s failure to perform under the contract.

    Filed under:
    USA, Louisiana, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Breach of contract, Safe harbor (law), Liquidation, Electricity generation, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    Ormet allowed to sell bankrupt Ohio facility free and clear of unfunded pension obligations
    2014-08-08

    Ormet, a Delaware corporation, recently went bankrupt and shuttered its facilities in Ohio and Louisiana. As part of the bankruptcy proceedings, Ormet agreed to sell its Ohio plant for $25 million. The Steelworkers Pension Trust, the union representing Ormet’s employees, tried to delay the closing on the theory that the deal approved by the judge improperly extinguished the Trust’s $5.5 million pension claim and that the Section 363 sale violated the Employee Retirement Income Security Act or the Multiemployer Pension Plan Amendments Act. The Trust lost.

    Filed under:
    USA, Louisiana, Ohio, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Roetzel & Andress, Bankruptcy
    Authors:
    Matthew D. Austin
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Roetzel & Andress
    I-v-I exclusion held not to preclude coverage for claims brought by chapter 7 trustee
    2012-03-23

    The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Louisiana has held that an insured versus insured exclusion does not apply to preclude coverage for claims brought by a duly appointed bankruptcy trustee against an insolvent corporation’s directors and officers.  Central Louisiana Grain Cooperative v. Vanderlick, 2012 WL 293173 (Bankr. W.D. La. Jan. 31, 2012).

    Filed under:
    USA, Louisiana, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Wiley Rein LLP, Fiduciary, Trustee, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Wiley Rein LLP
    O.W. Bunker Litigation in the United States: Contract Supplier and its Assignee have Enforceable Maritime Liens
    2016-04-19

    In our previous update concerning OW Bunker litigation in the United States, we discussed orders issued by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana in which the court held that a physical supplier of bunkers did not have an enforceable maritime lien against a vessel.  Valero Marketing and Supply Co. v. M/V ALMI SUN, No. 14 Civ. 2712 (NJB) (E.D. La. decided Dec. 28, 2015 and Feb.

    Filed under:
    USA, Louisiana, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Shipping & Transport, Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads LLP, Admiralty law
    Authors:
    Robert E. O’Connor
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads LLP
    In Considering Motions to Sever, District Courts Might Effectively Shift the Burden to Plaintiffs to Show Why the Automatic Stay Should Not Be Extended to Nondebtor Defendants
    2015-12-08

    “Round and around and around and around we go // Oh now tell me, now tell me, now tell me now you know // … It takes me all the way // I want [to extend the automatic] stay” – Rihanna (as modified)

    Filed under:
    USA, Louisiana, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    Claim amount: It pays to pay attention
    2015-07-22

    In re Walker, 526 B.R. 187 (E.D. La. 2015) –

    The bankruptcy court (1) denied a mortgage lender’s request to file a late amendment to a proof of claim that had been filed on its behalf by the debtor and (2) confirmed the debtor’s proposed plan over the mortgagee’s objection that the plan payments were not sufficient to cure the actual arrearage. The lender appealed to the district court.

    Filed under:
    USA, Louisiana, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Troutman Pepper, Debtor, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    Court finds no violation of Fair Debt Collection Practices Act
    2009-06-19

    A Louisiana District court finds that the filing of an allegedly time barred proof of claim by a creditor does not amount to a violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act. B-Real, LLC v. Rogers et al., 2009 WL 1405844 (M.D.La. May 19, 2009) (Ruling on Appeal)

    A Louisiana District Court ruling provides that a creditor did not violate the provisions of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) by filing what were alleged to be three time-barred proofs of claim based upon underlying debt allowed under Louisiana law.

    Filed under:
    USA, Louisiana, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Bricker & Eckler LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Debt, Summary offence, Collection agency, Title 11 of the US Code, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act 1977 (USA), United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Laura M. Zaremski
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Bricker & Eckler LLP

    Pagination

    • Current page 1
    • Page 2
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days