Global Insolvency | Daily News Headlines on Insolvency Developments across the Globe

Broader economic woes may have played a part in the court’s decision to dismiss allegations of lender overreaching

2010-09-13

American Consolidated Transportation Companies, Inc v RBS Citizens NA (In re American Consolidated Transportation Companies, Inc), Adversary No 10-00154, Bankruptcy No 09-26062 (Bankr ND Ill July 13, 2010)

CASE SNAPSHOT

Filed under:

USA, Illinois, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Bankruptcy, Letter of credit, Credit (finance), Debtor, Interest, Swap (finance), Liquidation, Good faith, Cashflow, Default (finance), Secured loan, The Royal Bank of Scotland, United States bankruptcy court

Authors:

Brian M. Schenker

Location:

USA

Firm:

Reed Smith LLP

Risk losing your first priority lien if you provide superfluous information in the UCC financing statement

2010-09-13

In re EDM Corporation, 2010 WL 1929772 (8th Cir BAP May 14, 2010)

CASE SNAPSHOT

Filed under:

USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Safe harbor (law), Uniform Commercial Code (USA), Bankruptcy Appellate Panel

Authors:

Cory Falgowski

Location:

USA

Firm:

Reed Smith LLP

Sanctions awarded under the bankruptcy court’s ‘inherent authority’

2010-09-13

In re 15375 Memorial Corporation, et al, 430 BR 142 (Bankr D Del May 17, 2010)

CASE SNAPSHOT

Filed under:

USA, Delaware, Energy & Natural Resources, Environment & Climate Change, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Bankruptcy, Costs in English law, Debtor, Discovery, Legal burden of proof, Holding company, Involuntary dismissal, Line of credit, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit

Authors:

Ann E. Pille

Location:

USA

Firm:

Reed Smith LLP

Delaware Bankruptcy Court sheds light on the common interest doctrine preventing the waiver of privileged communications

2010-11-02

The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the "Delaware Bankruptcy Court"), recently in In re Leslie Controls, Inc., Bankr. D. Del., Case No. 10-12199, expounded on whether attorney-client and attorney work-product privileged documents remained protected from discovery under the common interest doctrine. The common interest doctrine permits counsel representing different clients with similar legal interests to share information without having to disclose that information to others.

Filed under:

USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Waiver, Interest, Work-product doctrine, Attorney-client privilege, Discovery, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of Delaware

Authors:

Brian M. Rostocki

Location:

USA

Firm:

Reed Smith LLP

Consideration of a TRAC clause under the UCC and economic realities required to determine if equipment leases are true leases or disguised financing

2010-12-01

Hitchin Post Steak Co v General Electric Capital Corporation (In re HP Distribution, LLP), 436 B.R. 679 (Bankr. D. Kan. 2010)

CASE SNAPSHOT

The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Kansas considered whether commercial vehicle leases that contained Terminal Rental Adjustment Clauses (or TRAC provisions) were true leases under Section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code or, instead, disguised financing transactions. The court held that the TRAC leases were true leases that must be either assumed or assigned pursuant to the terms of Section 365.

Filed under:

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Interest, Consideration, Liquidation, Bright-line rule, Uniform Commercial Code (USA), United States bankruptcy court

Authors:

Ann E. Pille

Location:

USA

Firm:

Reed Smith LLP

Compensation distributions triggered by events outside the debtor’s control are property of the estate and subject to avoidance

2010-12-01

Parks v. Dittmar (In re Dittmar), 618 F.3d 1199 (10th Cir. 2010)

CASE SNAPSHOT

Filed under:

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Interest, Federal Reporter, Option (finance), Initial public offerings, Dissenting opinion, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, Tenth Circuit, Circuit court

Authors:

Christopher O. Rivas

Location:

USA

Firm:

Reed Smith LLP

Post-confirmation cramdown interest rate: ‘market formula’ applies to oversecured

2010-12-01

In re SJT Ventures, LLC, 2010 WL 3342206 (Bankr. N.D. Texas 2010)

CASE SNAPSHOT

Filed under:

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Interest, Limited liability company, Default (finance), Secured creditor, Commercial mortgage, Secured loan, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court

Authors:

Ann E. Pille

Location:

USA

Firm:

Reed Smith LLP

Undersecured mortgage lenders may include fees & costs in arrearage cure amount of chapter 13 debtor under section 1322(e)

2010-12-01

Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Tucker, No. 09-5867 (6th Cir. 2010)

CASE SNAPSHOT

In resolving a conflict within the Sixth Circuit, the Court of Appeals has held that chapter 13 debtors who propose in their plan of reorganization to cure the arrearage on their mortgage loan are required to pay all fees and costs required by the mortgage and non-bankruptcy law, even if the mortgage lender is undersecured. Put another way, mortgage lenders may include such fees and costs in their proofs of claim.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

Filed under: