Introduction

In Re China Huiyuan Group Ltd [2020] HKCFI 2940, the Court of First Instance declined to wind up a Hong Kong-listed Cayman company as the Court held that the petitioner failed to demonstrate that there was a real possibility of a tangible benefit to creditors upon the making of a winding up order.

Facts

SDF III Holdings Limited (the “Petitioner”) issued a petition to wind-up China Huiyuan Juice Group Limited (the “Company”) on the grounds of insolvency. The debt is not disputed.

Authors:
Location:

 Corporate Insolvency Cases 1. Winding up Listcos in Hong Kong - recent decision illustrates the difficulties creditors may face Re China Huiyuan Group Ltd [2020] HKCFI 2940 2. Hong Kong Court’s approach to validation application for MPF contributions made after the commencement of winding up Re Hsin Chong Construction Co Ltd [2020] HKCFI 3160 3. One petition against one debtor at one time Re China Greenfresh Group Co Ltd [2021] HKCFI 36 4. Failure to plead the basis of a petition clearly may render the petition defective Pointer & Dent Co Ltd [2020] HKCFI 2823 5.

Location:

引言\

香港法例第 485 章《強制性公積金計劃條例》規定,僱員及僱主均須在強制性公積金計劃 (「強積金」)作出強制性供款,違例的僱主即屬犯罪,而強制性公積金計劃管理局(「積金 局」)可提出法律程序追討強制性供款。最近在 Re Hsin Chong Construction Co Ltd [2020] HKCFI 3160 一案中,法院探討了公司在清盤開始後支付的尚欠強制性強積金供款,是否可獲 法院認可。 

背景

經營建築服務的新昌營造廠有限公司(「該公司」)正在進行清盤。2018 年 2 月起,該公司 偶然未能為其僱員作出強制性強積金供款。積金局對該公司提出民事訴訟,並在該公司沒有抗 辯下就四項申索取得勝訴,可討回 2018 年 3 至 9 月的未付強積金供款合共港幣 958 萬元。

Location:

引言

香港法例第 485 章《强制性公积金计划条例》规定,雇员及雇主均须在强制性公积金计划 (「强积金」)作出强制性供款,违例的雇主即属犯罪,而强制性公积金计划管理局(「积金 局」)可提出法律程序追讨强制性供款。最近在 Re Hsin Chong Construction Co Ltd [2020] HKCFI 3160 一案中,法院探讨了公司在清盘开始后支付的尚欠强制性强积金供款,是否可获 法院认可。 

背景

经营建筑服务的新昌营造厂有限公司(「该公司」)正在进行清盘。2018 年 2 月起,该公司 偶然未能为其雇员作出强制性强积金供款。积金局对该公司提出民事诉讼,并在该公司没有抗 辩下就四项申索取得胜诉,可讨回 2018 年 3 至 9 月的未付强积金供款合共港币 958 万元。

Location:

Introduction 

Section 209(1) of the Companies (Winding Up and Miscellaneous Provisions) Ordinance (Cap. 32) empowers the Hong Kong court to make an order staying the winding-up proceedings after the winding-up order is made upon the application of, among others, a contributory. However, in the case of Safe Castle Limited v China Silver Asset Management (Hong Kong) Limited [2020] HKCFI 1028, Harris J made it clear that the court will be reluctant to exercise its discretion to stay a winding-up order pending appeal.

Authors:
Location: