PROCEDURE INTERNATIONALE D’INSOLVABILITE
SEUL LE TRIBUNAL QUI OUVRE LA PROCEDURE PRINCIPALE A L’ENCONTRE D’UNE PERSONNE MORALE EST COMPETENT POUR PRONONCER UNE INTERDICTION DE GERER CONTRE LE DIRIGEANT DE CELLE-CI (CASS.COM. 22 JANVIER 2013 N°11-17.968 (N°55 F-PB), MAJOT C/ STE BECHERET- THIERRY-SENECHAL- GORRIAS ES. QUAL.)
This website uses its own cookies and those of third parties to analyze the use of this site to improve its contents and your user experience. If you continue to browse, we understand you accept their use. You can change your configuration or obtain further information here.
The perspective of a ahot summer arriving is an excellent opportunity to take a look at the most relevant events that occured on the second quarter of 2019.
On an international level, and in contrast with the previous quarters, few events are worth mentioning.
Supreme Administrative
Court Judgement of October 12, 2016
Case no. 0797/15
In this Judgment, the Supreme Administrative Court concluded that expenses related to employees, recorded as remuneration, salaries or wages, relevant to the limit of 15% foreseen for acceptance of the expenses with social benefits referred to in Article 43.2 of the CIT Code, are not limited to those that were subject to mandatory Social Security contributions.
South Central Administrative Court
Judgement of October 13, 2016
CONTENTS CORPORATE LAW NEWSLETTER I MARCH, 2017 I CAPITALIZAR PROGRAMME – PRESS RELEASE FROM THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS OF 16 MARCH 2017 2 II NATIONAL LEGISLATION 5 III NATIONAL CASE LAW 6 NEWSLETTER I CORPORATE WWW.CUATRECASAS.COM NEWSLETTER I CORPORATE 2/7 NEWSLETTER CORPORATE LAW I CAPITALIZAR PROGRAMME – PRESS RELEASE FROM THE COUNCIL OF MINISTERS OF 16 MARCH 2017 One of the priorities of the programme of the 21st Constitutional Government is to reduce the high level of corporate borrowing and to improve conditions for investment, which is why the capitalisation of companies is one
Judgment of the Supreme Court of Justice of 20-03-2014 Standardization of Jurisprudence – Insolvency Proceedings – Right of Retention
Judgment of the Supreme Court of Justice of 1 July 2014
This judgment concludes that the Insolvency Plan is an alternative corporate recovery measure which aims to satisfy the interests of the creditors, which applies indiscriminately to natural and to legal persons. When the insolvent is a natural person, the fact that the liquidation of its assets within the insolvency proceedings took place without the full payment of the claims, is still not enough to declare the release of the debtor.
Judgment of the Court of Appeal of Porto of 2014-11-06
Insolvency proceedings – Creditors of the insolvent debtor – Termination of proceedings – No need to adjudicate on the action
Judgment of the Supreme Court of Justice No 15/2014, published in Diário da República (Portuguese official gazette) No 24 of 2014-12-22
Insolvency – Insolvency Administrator – Presumption of bad faith
Portaria (Ordinance) No 261/2014 - Diário da República (Portuguese official gazette) No 242/2014, Series I of 2014-12-16
Amending for the first time the Regulation of the Local Support and Micro-company Incentive Scheme.
Reviewing the legal framework of urban lease.