Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    ABI chapter 11 Reform Commission: section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code (no more quick sales?)
    2015-01-31

    “Don’t care how; I want it now” – Veruca Salt, Willy Wonka and the Chocolate Factory

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Debtor, Title 11 of the US Code
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    Class action in bankruptcy: “no representation without designation!” said the Second Circuit
    2015-01-06

    In a recent decision by the Second Circuit, Lucas v. Dynegy Inc. (In re Dynegy, Inc.), No. 13-2581 (2d. Cir. Oct.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Bankruptcy, Class action, Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Andriana Georgallas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    Private equity firm held not responsible for portfolio company’s failure to provide adequate notice under WARN Act
    2014-11-26

    In Czyzewski v. Sun Capital Partners, Inc.1, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware affirmed a Bankruptcy Court determination that a private equity firm was not liable for its subsidiary portfolio company’s failure to provide adequate notice of a plant closing under the federal Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act (WARN Act).

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act 1988 (USA), Sun Capital Partners
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    Momentive postscript – Bankruptcy Rule 3018: vote changing on Chapter 11 plans: you can’t have your cake and eat it, too
    2014-11-03

    “Life is not about perfect information. Life is about choices, which is why you have elections.”

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    Authors:
    David Nigel Griffiths
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    Brazilian reorganization plan: fundamentally fair or wholesale trampling of creditors’ rights?
    2014-10-09

    The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York was recently presented in In re Rede Energia, S.A.with the question of whether a confirmed Brazilian reorganization plan for Rede Energia, S.A. should be enforced in the United States.

    Filed under:
    Brazil, USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Sunny Singh
    Location:
    Brazil, USA
    Firm:
    Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    Walking a mile in the trustee’s shoes: how s. 38 of the BIA can allow creditors to revive dismissed claims
    2014-09-15

    This article has been contributed to the blog by Patrick Riesterer and Mary Angela Rowe. Patrick Riesterer is an associate in the Insolvency and Restructuring group of Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP and Mary Angela Rowe is an articling student at Osler, Hoskin & Harcourt LLP.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    Can the FDIC assert direct as well as derivative claims of stockholders of failed banks? The Seventh Circuit says “no (but maybe they should)”
    2014-08-19

    In Levin v.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Shareholder, Fiduciary, Holding company, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (USA), Seventh Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    Indecent disclosure: how the failure to disclose a third-party release led to its undoing
    2014-07-23

    As a result of the sheer number of legal and factual issues involved in many chapter 11 cases, bankruptcy judges can sometimes find themselves as captives of the parties; they may not appreciate the significance of an issue or a provision buried in a longer document unless it is properly presented. Thus, it is imperative that counsel flag the key issues for the court.

    Filed under:
    USA, Pennsylvania, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    The Eighth Circuit reverses course and concludes that a license agreement that is part of a completed sale transaction is not an executory contract
    2014-06-26

    In 1988, Congress added section 365(n) to the Bankruptcy Code to provide special protections for licensees of intellectual property upon a debtor’s rejection of an intellectual property license agreement. Whether trademarks are within the ambit of section 365(n) protection, though, is open to question.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Trademarks, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Eighth Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP
    You thought your deal was set in stone? Maybe not, says bankruptcy court more than a decade after plan confirmation
    2014-06-03

    As one bankruptcy court has said, “[b]ecause deals are the heart and soul of the [c]hapter 11 process, bankruptcy courts enforce them as cut by the parties.” Unfortunately, however, deals do not always turn out as the parties expected and there is sometimes litigation to determine what exactly was bargained for in a chapter 11 plan.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, Debtor, Unjust enrichment, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 81
    • Page 82
    • Page 83
    • Page 84
    • Current page 85
    • Page 86
    • Page 87
    • Page 88
    • Page 89
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days