Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    A cautious tale in avoiding personal liability in insolvency Re Ralls Builders Ltd (in liquidation) [2016]
    2016-05-25

    Directors can be held liable to contribute to company assets if they knew or ought to have known at a point before the commencement of administration or insolvency that there was no reasonable prospect that the company would avoid this process. This is known as wrongful trading (section 214 of the Insolvency Act).

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, DAC Beachcroft, Liquidation, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Sarah Coutts
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    DAC Beachcroft
    Does section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986 void payments made by the insolvent company’s bank after the presentation of a winding-up petition
    2016-05-12

    Does section 127 of the Insolvency Act 1986 void payments made by the insolvent company’s bank after the presentation of a winding-up petition but pursuant to payment instructions issued by the company before presentation of the petition?

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Gatehouse Chambers, Liquidation, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Ryan Hocking
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Gatehouse Chambers
    Hosking and Mackay (Joint Liquidators of Hellas Telecommunications (Luxembourg) II SCA) v Apax Partners LLP and Others [2016] EWHC 558 (Ch)
    2016-05-03

    The Companies Court has set out the requirements necessary to serve out of the jurisdiction under the Practice Direction on Insolvency Proceedings.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Ashfords LLP
    Authors:
    Alan Bennett , Emma Clayton
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Ashfords LLP
    Existence of prior security could invalidate a UK administration appointment
    2016-05-04

    Key points

    Lenders and proposed administrators should ensure that permission is in place where permission of prior charge holders is required for the grant of new security.

    The facts

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Taylor Wessing
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Taylor Wessing
    Unreasonable rejection of offer to settle debt before bankruptcy?
    2016-05-04

    Key points

    Creditors petitioning for bankruptcy must carefully consider offers to settle debts and make a reasonable decision based on the circumstances.

    The facts

    A bankrupt sought permission to appeal his bankruptcy order on the basis that the Deputy District Judge incorrectly held that the petitioning creditor did not act unreasonably in rejecting the bankrupt’s offer to compound the debt and, therefore, ought to have dismissed the petition pursuant to Section 271(3) of the Insolvency Act 1986.

    The decision

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Taylor Wessing, Bankruptcy, Debt
    Authors:
    Richard Colebourn
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Taylor Wessing
    Part VII Transfers: UK Court makes an order affecting a New York excess & surplus lines trust
    2016-05-04

    The Copenhagen Reinsurance Company (CopRe) asked the UK High Court to make an Order sanctioning the intra-group transfer of the whole of its (re)insurance business to the Marlon Insurance Company (Marlon). Each of CopRe and Marlon wrote US excess and surplus lines insurance, and each of them maintained an excess and surplus lines trust fund in New York. The purpose of the transfer was to simplify the structure of the Enstar group. If the transfer was sanctioned, CopRe would be dissolved without winding up.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Cooley LLP
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Cooley LLP
    Trustees in bankruptcy and ancillary relief
    2016-05-04

    Key points

    Rights under s23, s24 and s31 of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 (the “Act”) can only be pursued by the spouses themselves. Consequently, any ongoing action brought pursuant to those sections of the Act does not vest in the trustee in bankruptcy on appointment.

    The facts

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Taylor Wessing, Bankruptcy, Trustee
    Authors:
    Katherine Hudson , Nick Moser
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Taylor Wessing
    Divorce triumphs over bankruptcy again
    2016-05-04

    Key points

    Challenging the transfer of assets through ancillary proceedings as transactions at an undervalue remains challenging.

    The facts

    This case centred around a property in Coventry originally owned and developed by a Mr Singh. After failing to pay his builders a substantial amount, on which he was subsequently bankrupted, Mr Singh charged the property to his father and then his sister-in-law.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Family, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Taylor Wessing, Bankruptcy, Divorce
    Authors:
    Neil Smyth
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Taylor Wessing
    UK Real Estate Quarterly Bulletin - May 2016
    2016-05-05

    Lease Assignment and Guarantees: Case Update and Recap

    Summary

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Planning, Real Estate, Paul Hastings LLP
    Authors:
    Mark Shepherd
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Paul Hastings LLP
    The dangers of an unlawful dividend
    2016-05-05

    There have been a number of recent instances, including this year, of quoted companies calling general meetings to seek shareholder approval to remedy dividends that were paid unlawfully. Invariably these have been for non-compliance with a statutory formality rather than because the company did not have sufficient distributable profits to make the dividend.

    Why are companies prepared to suffer the embarrassment and expense of going to their shareholders to fix the breach rather than simply doing nothing?

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Walker Morris LLP, Public company, Shareholder, Dividends
    Authors:
    Jo Stephenson
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Walker Morris LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 470
    • Page 471
    • Page 472
    • Page 473
    • Current page 474
    • Page 475
    • Page 476
    • Page 477
    • Page 478
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days