Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Wider implications referral: Lehman-backed structured products
    2009-05-18

    The FSA has published a statement entitled Wider implications referral: Lehman-backed structured products.  

    In the statement the FSA together with the Financial Ombudsman Service have jointly concluded that the Lehman Brothers’ insolvency raises issues in the UK structured products market.  

    It has been agreed that the FSA will now consider issues relating to Lehman-backed structured products under “the wider implications process” in order to allow it to explore all options to achieve the best outcome for consumers.  

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Norton Rose Fulbright, Option (finance), Lehman Brothers, FSA
    Authors:
    Charles Evans , Dorian Drew , Jonathan Herbst , Peter Snowdon
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
    Special Resolution Regime: the draft FSMA (Contribution to Costs of Special Resolution Regime) Regulations 2010: consultation
    2010-03-22

    HM Treasury has published a consultation paper which is entitled Special Resolution Regime: the draft FSMA (Contribution to Costs of Special Resolution Regime) Regulations 2010.

    This consultation seeks views on all aspects of the draft Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Contribution to Costs of Special Resolution Regime) Regulations 2010 which will be made under the new FSMA provisions when clause 28 of the Financial Services Bill is enacted.

    The deadline for comments on the consultation is 15 June 2010.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Norton Rose Fulbright, Public consultations, HM Treasury (UK)
    Authors:
    Jonathan Herbst , Peter Snowdon , Charles Evans , Dorian Drew
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
    CESR publishes a report on the Lehman Brothers default and provides an assessment of the market impact
    2009-03-30

    On 23 March 2009, the Committee of European Securities Regulators (CESR) published a report on the market impact of the Lehman Brothers default. The report began with a brief discussion of the causes of the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. It then set out some of the regulatory and industry responses to the challenges in the securities field including:

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Norton Rose Fulbright, Credit (finance), Security (finance), Clearing house (finance), Liquidation, Default (finance), Investment company, Bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers, Lehman Brothers
    Authors:
    Jonathan Herbst , Peter Snowdon
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
    Horton v Henry [2014] – pensions and bankruptcy – appeal allowed
    2015-02-19

    Of general interest is the appeal in the case of Horton v Henry, on which we reported in our January 2015 update. In Horton, the High Court declined to follow a previous ruling, and decided that a bankrupt could not be compelled to access his pension savings to pay off creditors.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Norton Rose Fulbright
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Norton Rose Fulbright
    Horton v Henry [2014] - High Court contradicts earlier case by ruling bankrupt cannot be required to draw pension to pay creditors
    2015-01-26

    Declining to follow a 2012 decision, the High Court has ruled that a bankrupt’s unexercised rights to draw his pension did not represent income to which he was entitled within the meaning of the Insolvency Act 1986, and so did not form part of the bankruptcy estate.

    Background

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Norton Rose Fulbright, Bankruptcy, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Peter Ford , Lesley Browning , Lesley Harrold
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Norton Rose Fulbright

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 1343
    • Page 1344
    • Page 1345
    • Page 1346
    • Page 1347
    • Page 1348
    • Page 1349
    • Page 1350
    • Current page 1351
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days