Energy Future Holdings (“EFH” or “Debtors”) has cleared all of the preliminary hurdles in its path as it moves towards the confirmation of its plan of reorganization (the “Plan”).

IN RE: GOLF 255, INC. (July 22, 2011)

REDMOND v. FIFTH THIRD BANK (October 20, 2010)

Four years ago, in Stern v. Marshall, the Supreme Court stunned many observers by re-visiting separation of powers issues regarding the jurisdiction of the United States bankruptcy courts that most legal scholars had viewed as long settled. Stern significantly reduced the authority of bankruptcy courts, and bankruptcy judges and practitioners both have since been grappling with the ramifications of that decision.

TOWNSQUARE MEDIA v. BRILL (July 21, 2011)

IN RE: RESOURCE TECHNOLOGY CORP. (October 1, 2010)

There were nearly a million bankruptcy cases filed by individuals and businesses in 2014.  It is safe to say that only the tiniest fraction of such debtors have any familiarity with the Supreme Court’s decision in Stern v.

REEDSBURG UTILITY COMMISSION v. GREDE FOUNDRIES (July 13, 2011)

IN RE: AIRADIGM COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (August 4, 2010)

Three years ago, in Stern v.