Justice has to be seen to be done. Without clear reasons from the court as to the decision it reached, a party is entitled to have reheard issues it raised on an earlier application but which there is no evidence the court considered.

The UK Government has announced a consultation on proposals to strengthen the administration regime for insurers, in particular to improve the protection and payment of benefits for persons insured with companies facing financial difficulties and addressing gaps in the administration regime for insurers as compared with the liquidation regime. The proposals include:

1. applying to administration the existing rules for valuing insurance contracts in liquidation; and

2. revising the objectives of administration in insurance company cases by:

Pre-packs continue to occupy centre stage, and administrators might be forgiven for feeling somewhat under the spotlight.

On 31 March 2010, the UK Insolvency Service released a new consultation paper entitled "improving the transparency of, and confidence in, pre-packaged sales in administrations.

FMLC has responded on aspects of Treasury’s consultations on resolution of investment banks. The paper’s main recommendations include:

In the present fi nancial climate, customers are increasingly asking for business critical software or other assets to be transferred to the customer should the supplier become insolvent, for the legitimate reason that the customer needs security of supply. Two recent Court of Appeal cases remind us that customers who outsource to and contract with potentially vulnerable service providers need to take account of the “anti-deprivation principle” when doing this.

On 6 April 2010 a second wave of major changes to the UK Insolvency Rules 1986 (the Rules) came into force.

The recent English court decision in Goldacre (Offices) Limited v Nortel Networks UK Limited (in administration) [2009] EWCH 3389 (Ch) may be controversial and raises thorny practical issues, especially in relation to the restructurings of retail businesses.   

If an administration order is made and a pending winding-up petition is subsequently dismissed, the costs of that petition are payable as an expense of the administration.1

In Griffi n v UHY Hacker Young & Partners1 the court dismissed an application for summary judgment on the basis of the ex turpi causa (or illegality) defence, and made a number of observations as to uncertainties in the law as it stands.