Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Construction insolvencies - what does it mean for your projects?
    2011-11-03

    According to the credit insurer, Euler Helmes, there were more insolvencies in construction than in any other sector during the first six months of 2011.

    Where an insolvency affects consultants and contractors mid project then clients will be concerned about the possible ramifications for their projects.  What are some of the key considerations for a client in this scenario.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Construction, Insolvency & Restructuring, Mills & Reeve LLP, Credit (finance), General contractor, Design
    Authors:
    James Richards
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Mills & Reeve LLP
    Personal liability for directors – no escape from the taxman
    2011-10-07

    Company Insolvencies

    One of the criticisms that is often made of the UK’s complex insolvency legislation is that it is too easy for the directors of a company to put it into liquidation or administration, ‘dump’ the company’s debts and then effectively start the same business again under the guise of a new company. Such phoenixism has often been of concern to HMRC both in the civil and criminal fields and prosecutions have been made against directors who have undertaken such activities on a repeated basis.

    Personal Liability Notices (‘PLNs’)

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, RPC, Regulatory compliance, Fraud, Board of directors, National Insurance, Debt, Liability (financial accounting), Economy, Liquidation, HM Revenue and Customs (UK), Social Security Administration
    Authors:
    Jonathan Levy
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    RPC
    Rodenstock - English law sufficient nexus for scheme of arrangement
    2011-10-10

    In recent years, several foreign companies have used the English law scheme of arrangement as a flexible restructuring method to compromise creditor claims.  The decision of the High Court in the latest of these cases, that of the German company Rodenstock GmbH, clarifies that an English court will accept jurisdiction where the only connection to England is that the company’s finance documents were governed by English law.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, King & Wood Mallesons, Exclusive jurisdiction, High Court of Justice (England & Wales)
    Authors:
    Robert Hanley
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    King & Wood Mallesons
    Supreme Court confirms that flip clauses don’t violate anti-deprivation principle
    2011-10-10

    One of the many issues which arose from the collapse of Lehman Brothers was whether “flip provisions”, which reverse a swap counterparty’s priority in the order of payment on insolvency, were invalid on the basis that they contravened the anti-deprivation principle.  This is a long-established common law principle which seeks to prevent an insolvent party from arranging its affairs to frustrate the legitimate claims of creditors.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, King & Wood Mallesons, Swap (finance), Good faith, Common law, Lehman Brothers cases, Lehman Brothers, Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    Robert Hanley
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    King & Wood Mallesons
    Deprived or deserved? The Supreme Court clarifies its interpretation of the anti-deprivation rule
    2011-10-10

    In its recent decision in Belmont Park Investments PTY Ltd v BNY Corporate trustee Services Ltd and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc,[1] the Supreme Court ruled in favour of investors, clarifying the limits of the anti-deprivation rule and holding that a commercially sensible transaction entered into in good faith and without the intention to evade insolvency laws should not infringe the anti-deprivation rule.

    Background

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Wedlake Bell, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Good faith, Common law, Default (finance), Credit default swap, Lehman Brothers, Trustee, Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    Edward Starling
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Wedlake Bell
    Appointment of administrators - "or" doesn't mean "and"
    2011-10-13

    The recent case of Stephen Petitioner offers some clarification regarding issues relating to the validity of appointment of administrators.

    The Facts

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, MacRoberts LLP, Board of directors
    Authors:
    Alan Meek , John Reid
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    MacRoberts LLP
    Sharples v Places for People Homes Ltd and Godfrey v A2 Dominion Homes Ltd (2011) EWCA Civ 813
    2011-10-14

    The Insolvency Act 1986 makes provision for, amongst other things, bankruptcy and Debt Relief Orders.

    When a person is made bankrupt, his property vests in the trustee in bankruptcy. Some items, however, are excluded from the estate, including any assured or secure tenancy (s283). Once a bankruptcy order has been made, no creditor in respect of a debt provable in the bankruptcy may have any remedy against the property of the bankrupt 'in respect of that debt' (s285(3)(a)).

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Penningtons Manches Cooper LLP, Bankruptcy, Costs in English law, Landlord, Leasehold estate, Debt, Moratorium, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), Court of Appeal of England & Wales
    Authors:
    Colin Hammond
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Penningtons Manches Cooper LLP
    Pre-pack insolvency sales reforms delayed further
    2011-10-17

    New rules imposing extra regulation on pre-packaged insolvency sales by liquidators and administrators were expected to go live in October, but they will not now come into force before April 2012, according to the Insolvency Service. The delay is apparently due to the continued debate on the proposal for liquidators and administrators to have to give a three day notice period of a proposed sale aimed at giving creditors a chance to "express concerns ... or make a higher offer for the assets".

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Mills & Reeve LLP, Unsecured debt, Stakeholder (corporate), Liquidator (law)
    Authors:
    Tracey Atkins
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Mills & Reeve LLP
    Pensions speedbrief - enforceability of regulator’s anti-avoidance powers: latest from the Court of Appeal
    2011-10-18

    The Court of Appeal has confirmed that where the Pensions Regulator (Regulator) exercises its anti-avoidance powers against a company during insolvency, the liability ranks as an expense in the insolvency process.  The 14 October 2011 judgment, in a case involving the Nortel and Lehman Brothers groups, upheld the High Court's landmark decision of last year.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP, Unsecured debt, Debt, Liability (financial accounting), Defined benefit pension plan, The Pensions Regulator (UK), Lehman Brothers, Pensions Act 2004 (UK), Court of Appeal of England & Wales, High Court of Justice (England & Wales)
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Eversheds Sutherland (International) LLP
    Financial support directions and insolvency part 2 - the Court of Appeal
    2011-10-18

    As you may recall, the High Court ruled in December 2010, in a case brought by the administrators of 20 insolvent companies in the Lehman and Nortel groups, that the cost of complying with a financial support direction ("FSD"), issued by the Pensions Regulator after the date of the commencement of a company's administration or liquidation, would rank as an expense of the administration or liquidation.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Unsecured debt, Debt, Liability (financial accounting), Liquidation, The Pensions Regulator (UK), Lehman Brothers, Pensions Act 2004 (UK), Court of Appeal of England & Wales, High Court of Justice (England & Wales)
    Authors:
    Emma J. Flacks , Marc Bergen
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 396
    • Page 397
    • Page 398
    • Page 399
    • Current page 400
    • Page 401
    • Page 402
    • Page 403
    • Page 404
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days