This decision by the TCC provides further consideration of the right of a company in liquidation to refer a dispute to adjudication. It follows the earlier Court of Appeal decision in Bresco Electrical services Limited (in liquidation) v Michael J Lonsdale (Electrical) Ltd (“Bresco”) which we considered in an article earlier this year.

The facts

A case study of what to look out for when a tenant or its guarantor is looking like it is heading for financial difficulties

As a prudent and prepared landlord, it's always sensible to assess what potential remedies you might have should a tenant (or its guarantor) become insolvent or enter into some form of insolvency procedure. In this bulletin, we look at a short hypothetical case study and identify some of the key issues that landlords will need to assess in such circumstances.

1. The case study scenario

Winding-up petitions are being used increasingly in the construction industry as a means of recovering unpaid debts. It is the ‘nuclear’ recovery option because the consequences for the recipient company can be catastrophic (both for its reputation and financially). So when responding to a winding-up petition, time is very much of the essence.

To secure an order for the #winding-up of a Quasi-Partnership company on the Just& Equitable ground, is it necessary only to show that mutual trust and confidence between the shareholders/quasi-partners has broken down? Hardwicke investigates the recent case of Badyal v Badyal & Ors [2019] EWCA Civ 1644

Background

Dealing with pensions in insolvency can be challenging for insolvency practitioners (“IPs”) and the Pension Scheme Bill (“Bill”) presents another.

Whilst a prudent insolvent practitioner should not be unduly alarmed, s114 of the Bill inserts a new section 80B into the Pensions Act 2004 which gives the Pensions Regulator (tPR) power to issue insolvency practitioners with a fine of up to £1 million.

A significant amount, and payable personally!

Shail Patel acted for the successful defendants at trial in Bank of Baroda v Maniar [2019] EWHC 2463 Comm, in resisting claims by the bank on personal guarantees. The case raised a number of important points of European cross border insolvency law under the European Insolvency Regulation, and the English Court’s exercise of a foreign law judicial power.

The Government announced an independent review of HMRCs loan charge in September 2019. In this blog we consider the effect of the review on directors who have or are settling claims with HMRC and highlight that the review does not impact on potential claims against directors of insolvent businesses.

Regardless of the outcome of the review, employee benefit trusts (“EBT”) which are not legitimate, are still tax avoidance schemes.

[2019] EWHC 2651 (TCC)

中英企业交易中的“五行”元素——第一部分：金

在与向英国供货的国际公司合作的过程中，我们发现了一些常见问题。本系列五篇文章围绕“五行”的各个元素展开探讨，指出了供应商在和英国客户做生意过程中面临的关键风险，以及供应商如何才能最好地保护自己，从而确保其商务活动和商业关系的和谐。第一个元素“金”确保供应商得到应得的货款，避免或尽量减少风险、困难和难以解决的困境。

金：及时获得全额付款，让您的业务和商业关系发展壮大

在协助我们的国际贸易客户处理的各种事项中，最常见的是追款。因此，我们建议所有供应商在签订合同或根据标准商业条款向客户供货时，确保在客户违约的情况下尽可能让自己处于最有利的境地。

对供应商而言，最有利的索赔是财产索赔。根据所有权保留条款，在客户未付清货款前，供应商仍对交付给客户的货物拥有所有权。如果客户破产，供应商有权收回货物（或收取货款）。

其他合同保护措施包括：

在与向英国供货的国际公司合作的过程中，我们发现了一些常见问题。前几篇文章探讨了供应商可采用的合同付款保护措施。在“五行”系列第三篇文章中，我们将以“水”元素为主题，阐释当客户面临财务困难带来的不确定性及正式破产程序的严冬时会出现什么情况。

水：了解在客户破产情况下的情势及此时供应商享有的权利

在我们提供法律服务的供应商中，其大多数客户都是英国有限公司。供应商的客户在遭遇财务困难后会根据英国法律进入破产程序。因此，对我们的国际客户而言，明白自己的客户破产对自己意味着什么，这非常重要。

客户进入管理程序，意味着有机会保持业务的持续经营。在此种情况下，客户公司受管理人控制，管理人的目标之一是满足公司债权人的要求。并不能保证所有债权人都能得到全额偿付，因为这主要取决于公司资产的价值。然而，部分债权人（如员工和税务机关——英国税务海关总署）会优先于无担保债权人受偿。如果在任何时候确定无法继续保持业务的持续经营，则管理程序可转为清算程序。许多管理程序以出售业务和资产告终，这可以通过一个“预打包”过程予以实现(即在任命管理人前安排出售，以促成这笔交易)。在此种情况下，债务仍由公司承担，从出售所得中偿还，但不可能对新的资产所有者进行追索。