As if it wasn’t hard enough trying to displace the internal combustion engine as the motive force of the automobile, then this happens. First the plug-in hybrid Chevy Volt’s battery starts catching fire. Then battery-maker Ener1 files for bankruptcy protection. Last Thursday,
As real estate-related bankruptcy filings remain steady, courts continue to see debtors challenging the validity of deeds of trust and mortgages due to minor scriveners’ errors. The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina is viewed by debtors as a favorable venue in which to bring such challenges due to a string of prior rulings starting with In re Head Grading in 2006, which invalidated a North Carolina deed of trust that incorrectly cited the date of the related note by one day. The latest chapter in this saga involves an effort by a
Summary
In a 32 page decision signed January 3, 2012, Judge Walrath of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court ruled that holders of litigation tracking warrants that would be paid out in stock of the debtor were equity instruments, and would be paid out at the same priority as common equity under the bankruptcy plan. Judge Walrath’s opinion is available here (the “Opinion”).
Background
IN RE: RIVER EAST PLAZA, LLC (January 19, 2012)
When River East Plaza LLC defaulted on its mortgage in early 2009, LNV Corp., which held the first mortgage, started foreclosure proceedings. Shortly before the scheduled sale of the property, River East filed for bankruptcy. In its plan, it proposed to exchange LNV's lien for one that was an "indubitable equivalent" under section 1129(b)(2)(A)(iii). Bankruptcy Judge Wedoff (N.D. Ill.) rejected the plan and dismissed the petition. River East brought a direct appeal under section 158(d)(2)(A).
On December 1, 2011, critical changes to the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure took effect. Among the changes, which impact all creditors, are amendments altering the information required on a proof of claim filed in a bankruptcy court. Bankruptcy Rule 3001 was substantially changed to require, among other information: (i) an itemized statement of the amount of interest, fees, expenses or other charges incurred before the bankruptcy petition was filed, if a claim includes the aforementioned fees and expenses; (ii) a statement of the amount necessary to cure any default as of
Reliance Insurance Company in Liquidation (the “Liquidator”) petitioned a Pennsylvania state court for a declaratory judgment holding that Aramark Corporation must reimburse certain state guaranty associations (“GAs”) for claims allegedly improperly paid to Aramark and subsequently presented to the Reliance Estate by the GAs for payment. The Liquidator also sought a declaration that Aramark’s claims against the Estate should be given low priority.
For employers to understand the big picture, our earlier posts described the government subsidies, individual
Many creditors have had the unfortunate experience of receiving a demand letter or adversary complaint alleging that they received avoidable transfers—commonly known as "preferential payments" or "preferences"—during the 90 days preceding a customer's federal bankruptcy filing. Such claims arise under section 547 of the Bankruptcy Code, and can result in a creditor having to return certain payments made during the 90-day preference period.
Introduction
On February 10th, electricity operator LSP Energy LP ("LSP") filed chapter 11 petitions for bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. As stated in court filings, LSP owns and operates an electricity plant located in Batesville, Mississippi. Aside from its gas-fired electric generation facility, LSP's assets consist primarily of 58 acres of land in which it operates its facility. See Declaration of LSP's President in Support of First Day Motions (the "Declaration" or "Decl.").
USDC S.D. California, February 10, 2012