Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    A closer look at the Satcon Technology bankruptcy
    2012-10-21

    On October 17, 2012, Satcon Technology Corporation and various of its subsidiaries (collectively, "Satcon") filed chapter 11 petitions for bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware.  Satcon's subsidiaries include Satcon Power Systems, Inc., Satcon Electronics, Inc., Satcon Power Systems, LLC, Satcon International and Satcon Technology.  As stated in Satcon's Declaration filed with the Delaware Bankruptcy Court (the "Decl."), Satcon provides "utility-grade po

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Renewable energy, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    L. Jason Cornell
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    A123 files Chapter 11
    2012-10-21

    Electric vehicle battery manufacturer A123, which received a $249 million stimulus grant from the Department of Energy, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection October 15 in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware to facilitate an agreement in which Johnson Controls will purchase its automotive business assets for $125 million. The company has drawn down roughly $131 million of its grant, and has faced problems with batteries supplied to Fisker as well as low demand for electric vehicles.

    Filed under:
    USA, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Shipping & Transport, Mintz
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Mintz
    Back Yard Burgers files for bankruptcy in Delaware
    2012-10-23

    On October 17, 2012, Back Yard Burgers, Inc.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    L. Jason Cornell
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Forget about buying your way out of “cramdown” in the Ninth Circuit
    2012-10-23

    The Bottom Line:

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Ninth Circuit, United States bankruptcy court, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
    Authors:
    Darren Halverson
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Trademark licensees do not need the protection of Section 365(n) to continue to use property post-rejection
    2012-10-23

    The Bottom Line:

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Trademarks, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Seventh Circuit
    Authors:
    David Allen
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    ‘Intent’ inferred, summary judgment granted in debt recharacterization case
    2012-10-15

    In re Shubh Hotels Pittsburgh, Inc., Bankr. No. 10-26337JAD (Bankr. W.D. Pa. July 24, 2012)

    CASE SNAPSHOT

    Filed under:
    USA, Pennsylvania, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Debtor, Interest, Debt, Balance sheet
    Authors:
    Joseph D. Filloy
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    Eighth Circuit rules trademark license is executory contract in bankruptcy
    2012-10-15

    In In re Interstate Bakeries Corporation, ___ F.3d ___ (8th Cir. 2012) (IBC), the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that a perpetual, royalty-free trademark license was an executory contract and therefore subject to assumption or rejection by a bankruptcy debtor. This decision is at odds with a recent decision from the Third Circuit Court of Appeals, In re Exide Technologies, 607 F.3d 957 (3d Cir. 2010), which found that such a license under similar circumstances was not an executory contract and could thus not be assumed or rejected by the bankruptcy debtor.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Trademarks, ArentFox Schiff, Bankruptcy, Federal Reporter, Eighth Circuit, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    Anthony V. Lupo , Leah M. Eisenberg , David J. Kozlowski
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    ArentFox Schiff
    “Strong arm” powers: not all mistakes are equal in avoiding a mortgage
    2012-10-16

    Field v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage (In re Jared), 474 B.R. 521 (Bankr. S.D. Ohio 2011) –

    Filed under:
    USA, Ohio, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Troutman Pepper, Constructive notice
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    Vertis Holdings files for bankruptcy in Delaware
    2012-10-16

    On October 10, 2012, Vertis Holdings, Inc. ("Vertis"), and various related entities, filed chapter 11 petitions for bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware.  This is Vertis' third time in bankruptcy in recent years.  As stated in the company's Declaration in Support of Chapter 11 Petitions (the "Decl."), Vertis filed a prepackaged bankruptcy in Delaware in July of 2008.  Vertis filed its first bankruptcy in order to merge with American Color Graphics and restructure some of the company's debt.   Decl.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Direct marketing, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    L. Jason Cornell
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Bankruptcy court refuses to pierce the veil of Tennessee LLC
    2012-10-16

    The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee ruled in August that an LLC’s creditor could not pierce the LLC’s veil to assert its claim against the LLC’s sole member. In a twist, the LLC’s member, not the LLC, was the debtor in bankruptcy. In re Steffner, No. 11-51315, 2012 WL 3563978 (Bankr. E.D. Tenn., Aug. 17, 2012).

    Filed under:
    USA, Tennessee, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Stoel Rives LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Limited liability company, Unsecured creditor, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Stoel Rives LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 915
    • Page 916
    • Page 917
    • Page 918
    • Current page 919
    • Page 920
    • Page 921
    • Page 922
    • Page 923
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days