Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Lehman: new limitations on plan payment of individual creditors’ committee members’ professional fees
    2014-04-17

    In the recent case of Davis v. Elliot Mgmt. Corp. (In re Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc.), 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 48102 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 31, 2014), the District Court for the Southern District of New York issued a decision barring reorganization plans from paying legal fees of individual members of official creditors’ committees absent a showing of substantial contribution to the estate.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Lehman Brothers, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Peter A. Baumgaertner , Leo T. Crowley , Richard L. Epling , Dina E. Yavich
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
    Self-executing discharge exception may save $2.3 billion whistleblower suit against reorganized debtor
    2014-04-17

    In a matter of first impression, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York recently held that former employees of a subcontractor of Hawker Beechcraft Corporation (“Hawker”)—a company that emerged from bankruptcy in 2013 and was purchased by Textron Inc.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, Whistleblower, Debtor, False Claims Act 1863 (USA)
    Authors:
    Erica G. Weinberger , Kellie A. Cairns
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP
    1st Circuit limits secured lender’s right to post-petition interest by applying flexible standard
    2014-04-18

    In an important decision for lenders, the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals recently decided In re SW Boston Hotel Venture LLC, holding that a bankruptcy court was right to give a lender a claim for post-petition interest beginning on the date of the sale of its collateral rather than the commencement date of the debtor’s bankruptcy case.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Interest
    Authors:
    Hugh McCullough , Bradley R. Duncan
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
    Bankruptcy court opinion serves as a reminder that credit bid rights are not absolute
    2014-04-18

    A recent opinion out of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Richmond Division) serves as a reminder to secured creditors to steer clear of conduct that a bankruptcy court may deem inequitable and provide the court with cause to limit the secured creditor’s credit bid rights.  In In re The Free Lance-Star Publishing Co.

    Filed under:
    USA, Virginia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Wiley Rein LLP, Bankruptcy, Credit (finance), Debtor, Secured creditor, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for Eastern District of Virginia
    Authors:
    John T. Farnum
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Wiley Rein LLP
    Loan to moan? Judge limits right to credit bid in Chapter 11 case of Free Lance-Star Publishing Co
    2014-04-21

    A few months ago, a ruling in the Chapter 11 case of Fisker Automotive narrowed a secured creditor’s right to credit bid its debt in connection with a sale of the debtor’s assets.  The decision surprised many observers and resurrected uncertainty about a debtor’s ability to limit a secured lender’s credit bidding rights (a dispute that appeared to have been firmly r

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, Secured creditor
    Authors:
    Benjamin D. Feder
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
    Unpaid employer contributions as plan assets: expansion of liability under ERISA
    2014-04-21

    The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), requires trustees of multiemployer pension and benefit funds to collect contributions required to be made by contributing employers under their collective bargaining agreements (“CBAs”) with the labor union sponsoring the plans. This is not always an easy task—often, an employer is an incorporated entity with limited assets or financial resources to satisfy its contractual obligations.

    Filed under:
    USA, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Proskauer Rose LLP, Bankruptcy, Employee Retirement Income Security Act 1974 (USA), Fiduciary, Eleventh Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Proskauer Rose LLP
    DOJ and FTC clarify antitrust implications of cybersecurity information sharing
    2014-04-22

    On 10 April 2014, the Department of Justice (DOJ) and Federal Trade Commission (FTC) issued a joint policy statement on the antitrust implications of sharing cybersecurity information to help facilitate the flow of cyberintelligence throughout the private sector. The statement addresses the long-standing concern that sharing cyberintelligence may violate antitrust law under certain circumstances and explains the analytical framework for such arrangements to make it clear that legitimate cyberintelligence exchanges will not raise antitrust issues.

    Filed under:
    USA, Competition & Antitrust, Insolvency & Restructuring, Internet & Social Media, Hogan Lovells, Computer security, Information privacy, Federal Trade Commission (USA), US Department of Justice, US DoJ Antitrust Division, National Institute of Standards and Technology (USA)
    Authors:
    Joseph G. Krauss , Harriet Pearson , Janet L. McDavid , Christopher Wolf
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Hogan Lovells
    8th Circuit expands application of new value defense in preference actions
    2014-04-22

    On March 20, 2014, the Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit issued an important decision in Stoebner v. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. (In re LGI Energy Solutions Inc.), No. 12-3899, Slip Op. (8th Cir. Mar. 20, 2014) that expands the scope of the “subsequent new value” defense in lawsuits seeking to clawback alleged preference payments.

    Filed under:
    USA, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cooley LLP, Eighth Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Cooley LLP
    Pillsbury Senior Counsel Greg Laughlin discusses the future of government bailouts
    2014-04-15

    Senior Counsel Greg Laughlin discusses the legislative steps being taken to prevent future large-scale government bailouts of distressed financial institutions. From implementation of the Dodd-Frank Act to the introduction of the PATH Act in the U.S. House of Representatives, efforts are underway to end bailouts by placing greater emphasis on private capital solutions that diminish the need for taxpayer dollars.

    Click here to view the video.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP, Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act 2010 (USA)
    Authors:
    Gregory H. Laughlin
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP
    The Fisker case and its impact on distressed M&A
    2014-04-15

    As is well known, the right to credit bid is the entitlement of a secured lender to bid the amount of its outstanding claims at the sale of its collateral. If the secured lender places the winning bid, no money is exchanged and the purchase price is offset against the existing claims. Credit bidding provides an important right to secured lenders in ensuring that their collateral is not sold for a depressed value. If a secured lender thinks its collateral is being sold too cheaply, it has the option of taking the collateral in exchange for some or all its claims.

    Filed under:
    USA, Corporate Finance/M&A, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dechert LLP, Credit (finance), Collateral (finance), Secured loan, US Department of Energy
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Dechert LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 822
    • Page 823
    • Page 824
    • Page 825
    • Current page 826
    • Page 827
    • Page 828
    • Page 829
    • Page 830
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days