Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Seventh Circuit Finds Section 546(c) Creates Federal Priority Rule for Disputes Between Reclaiming Sellers and Secured Lenders
    2020-02-21

    The Bottom Line

    In Whirlpool Corp. v. Wells Fargo Bank (In re hhgregg Inc.), Case No. 18-3363 (7th Cir. Feb. 11, 2020), the Seventh Circuit held that a trade creditor’s later-in-time reclamation claim was subordinate to lenders’ pre-petition and debtor-in-possession (“DIP”) financing liens. The Seventh Circuit found that Sction 546(c) of the Bankruptcy Code creates a “federal priority rule,” making clear that a reclamation claim is subordinate to prior rights of a secured creditor.

    What Happened?

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Seventh Circuit
    Authors:
    Kelly E. Porcelli
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Third Circuit Addresses the Due Process Rights of Asbestos Claimants
    2020-02-21

    When there are large numbers of substantial individual tort claims against a debtor, potentially involving claimants unknowable to the debtor who themselves may not know they have a claim, the bankruptcy process faces special problems. One objective of bankruptcy is to afford final relief to the debtor from the debtor’s debts, but discharging the claims of those unknown claimants without notice and a hearing poses due process problems.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    Jonah Wacholder , Daniel A. Lowenthal
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
    Lender Beware: Two Recent Bankruptcy Cases Highlight Importance of Diligence in UCC-1 Filings
    2020-02-24

    Lenders should view as cautionary tales two recently handed down decisions regarding UCC-1 financing statements and the perfection of security interests. On December 20, 2019, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Kansas in In re Preston held that security interests in personal property were unperfected because the UCC-1 incorrectly set forth the debtor’s name. On January 2, 2020, the U.S.

    Filed under:
    USA, North Carolina, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Troutman Pepper, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Deborah J. Enea
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    Bankruptcy Court Holds That Filing a False Rule 3001.1 Notice is an Abuse of Process Under the Bankruptcy Code and Violates FDCPA
    2020-02-18

    Key Notes:

    Filed under:
    USA, Texas, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Thompson Hine LLP, Mortgage loan, Due diligence, Fair Debt Collection Practices Act 1977 (USA), United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Jessica E. Salisbury-Copper , Scott A. King , Scott E. Prince
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Thompson Hine LLP
    9th Cir. Affirms Dismissal of TILA Claims as Barred by FIRREA
    2020-02-18

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently affirmed the dismissal of a consumer’s Truth in Lending Act (TILA) claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, holding that the claim was barred by the jurisdiction-stripping provision of the federal Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act (FIRREA).

    A copy of the opinion in Shaw v. Bank of America is available at: Link to Opinion.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Maurice Wutscher LLP, Bank of America Home Loans, Truth in Lending Act 1968 (USA)
    Authors:
    Hector E. Lora
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Maurice Wutscher LLP
    The Small Business Reorganization Act Takes Effect Today
    2020-02-19

    On August 23, 2019, Congress passed, and the President signed into law, Public Law 116-54 known as the “Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019” or “SBRA.” It takes effect on February 19, 2020. The SBRA adds a provision (namely subchapter V) to Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code to make the reorganization process less complicated, and thus less expensive, for small businesses. The Act generally defines a small business as a debtor with less than approximately $2.7 Million of secured and unsecured debt.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Public, Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
    Authors:
    John D. Finerty, Jr.
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
    Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 Goes into Effect
    2020-02-19

    Today, February 19, 2020, the Small Business Reorganization Act of 2019 (SBRA) becomes effective. Signed into law on August 23, 2019, this new subchapter to Chapter 11 reorganization is available to address problems encountered by small business debtors in reorganization under the provisions of the United States Bankruptcy Code.

    SBRA is intended to facilitate the reorganization of a small business, with the goal of making small business bankruptcy proceedings more efficient and economical. The key components of SBRA are as follows:

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP
    Authors:
    Nancy Isaacson
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP
    Supplier Reclaiming Shipments to Bankrupt Retailer Loses to Secured Super-Priority Lender
    2020-02-19

    Executive Summary

    In any bankruptcy, there are inevitably winners and losers. The winners do not always do virtuous acts to win and the losers are not necessarily evil. Rather, dividing up a limited pie, the bankruptcy courts must leave some creditors short-changed. A good example is the recent 7th Circuit case involving a supplier and a lender. (hhgregg, Inc. et al. (Debtor). Whirlpool Corporation v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, and GACP Finance Co., LLC, 7th Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 18-3363, February 11, 2020)

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Masuda Funai Eifert & Mitchell Ltd, Bankruptcy, Seventh Circuit
    Authors:
    Stephen M. Proctor
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Masuda Funai Eifert & Mitchell Ltd
    Seventh Circuit Holds that Reclamation Claims are Statutorily Subordinate to Prior Floating Liens on Inventory
    2020-02-20

    In Whirlpool Corporation v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al. (In re hhgregg, Inc.), No. 18-3363 (7th Cir. Feb. 11, 2020), the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (“BAPCPA“) created a federal priority rule rendering a secured lender’s first-priority, floating liens on inventory superior to the reclamation claims of a trade vendor. The facts in the case are typical, and the holding does not mark a demonstrative shift in common practice.

    Facts

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, FisherBroyles LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Seventh Circuit
    Authors:
    H. Joseph Acosta
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    FisherBroyles LLP
    Court Holds Filing of Proof of Claim Results in Waiver of Right to Jury Trial Despite Claimants’ Purported Reservation of Rights
    2020-02-20

    The Bottom Line

    In an opinion dated Jan. 10, 2020, Bankruptcy Judge Craig A. Gargotta of the Western District of Texas (San Antonio Division) held that a creditor who submits a proof of claim in bankruptcy waives its right to a jury trial, regardless of whether the creditor has couched its claim in protective language purporting to reserve its right to a jury trial. See Schmidt v. AAF Players LLC (In re Legendary Field Exhibitions LLC), 19-05053 (Bankr. W.D. Tex. Jan. 10, 2020).

    What Happened?

    Background

    Filed under:
    USA, Texas, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Supreme Court of the United States, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Erica D. Wolf
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 328
    • Page 329
    • Page 330
    • Page 331
    • Current page 332
    • Page 333
    • Page 334
    • Page 335
    • Page 336
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days