Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Secured lenders have a right to credit bid in bankruptcy -- at least in the Seventh Circuit
    2011-08-02

    Breaking with the Third Circuit and the Fifth Circuit, on June 28, 2011, the Seventh Circuit held that a debtor's plan of reorganization that provides for the sale of the debtor's assets free and clear of an existing security interest may only be confirmed over the objection of its secured creditor if the plan's sale procedure permits the secured creditor to credit bid its secured debt for the assets being sold. River Road Hotel Partners, LLC v. Amalgamated Bank, -- F.3d --, Nos. 10-3597 & 10-3598 (7th Cir. June 28, 2011).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP, Bankruptcy, Credit (finance), Debtor, Collateral (finance), Federal Reporter, Option (finance), Secured creditor, Secured loan, US Code, Title 11 of the US Code, Fifth Circuit, Third Circuit, Seventh Circuit
    Authors:
    Andrew S. Nicoll
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
    PBGC finalizes rule for terminating underfunded plans in bankruptcy
    2011-08-01

    On June 14, 2011, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) published its final rule on the termination of an underfunded pension plan when the sponsor is in bankruptcy. The final rule is substantially the same as the proposed rule published in 2008. The Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA) amended the rules for a single-employer pension plan termination when the contributing sponsor is in bankruptcy.

    Filed under:
    USA, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren SC, Bankruptcy, Retirement, Subsidy, Sponsor (commercial), Valuation (finance), Disability benefits, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, Pension Protection Act 2006 (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren SC
    Remand order is not appealable when lower court unmistakenly dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, even though erroneously
    2011-08-01

    TOWNSQUARE MEDIA v. BRILL (July 21, 2011)

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Media & Entertainment, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, Bankruptcy, Summary offence, Remand (court procedure), Non-disclosure agreement, Subject-matter jurisdiction, Supplemental jurisdiction, United States bankruptcy court, Seventh Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
    Decision in crucible materials requires preference claims to contain more than just recitations of the code
    2011-08-01

    Summary

    In a 12 page decision signed July 6, 2011, Judge Walrath of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court granted a motion to dismiss, holding that a complaint that sets forth only conclusory allegations parroting the statutory language of the Bankruptcy Code is insufficient. Judge Walrath’s opinion is available here (the “Opinion”).

    Background

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Debtor, Debt, Constitutional amendment, Title 11 of the US Code, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (USA), Trustee, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    L. John Bird
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Arbitration round-up
    2011-08-03

    Timeliness:

    Ohio Farmers Insurance Co. v. City of Akron, Case Nos. 25642, 25725 (Ohio Ct. App. July 20, 2011) (affirming confirmation of award; panel properly found “good cause” for delay in seeking confirmation; rule providing one year to seek confirmation deemed not a statute of limitations).

    Partiality:

    Filed under:
    USA, Arbitration & ADR, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jorden Burt LLP, Statute of limitations, Vacated judgment, Standard of review, Motion to vacate, FINRA, Fifth Circuit, Eleventh Circuit, Third Circuit, US District Court for the Southern District of New York, US District Court for District of Columbia
    Authors:
    Michael Wolgin
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jorden Burt LLP
    Decision in Tweeter Opco, LLC., holds non-debtor controlling company liable for debtor's violation of the WARN Act
    2011-08-03

    Summary

    In a 24 page decision signed July 8, 2011, Judge Walrath of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court granted a motion to for summary judgment, holding a non-debtor defendant liable with the Debtor as a single employer for alleged WARN Act violations. Judge Walrath’s opinion is available here (the “Opinion”).

    Background

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Class action, Federal Reporter, Limited liability company, Good faith, Summary offence, Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act 1988 (USA), United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    L. John Bird
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Circuit courts uphold dismissal of securities claims based on alleged fraud in sale of auction rate securities
    2011-08-03

    Two recent opinions from separate federal courts of appeal upheld the dismissal of lawsuits by sophisticated investors that suffered losses in the auction rate securities ("ARS") market against the securities broker-dealers that allegedly fraudulently induced the purchase of the ARS.1

    Filed under:
    USA, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Duane Morris LLP, Security (finance), Fraud, Market liquidity, Limited liability company, Misrepresentation, Due diligence, Broker-dealer, Underwriting, Securities fraud, US Securities and Exchange Commission, Securities Exchange Act 1934 (USA), Second Circuit, Sixth Circuit, Circuit court
    Authors:
    Wayne A. Mack , Matthew M. Ryan
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Duane Morris LLP
    Seventh Circuit hears lenders’ shout “Give me credit, will ya!”
    2011-08-03

    The Bottom Line:

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Credit (finance), Secured loan, United States bankruptcy court, Seventh Circuit
    Authors:
    Rachael Ringer
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    From Dodger blue into the red: a case study of the use of bankruptcy to fight for control of a business
    2011-08-03

    While some fans of the Cleveland Indians have long complained about the frugality of owner Paul Dolan, at least Mr. Dolan has never had trouble making payroll. In perhaps the biggest event to occur off the field since Walter O'Malley moved the team from Brooklyn, the Los Angeles Dodgers filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on June 27, 2011.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Media & Entertainment, Calfee Halter & Griswold LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Hedge funds, Divorce, Business judgement rule, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Jean R. Robertson , James M. Lawniczak , Kevin P. Shannon
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Calfee Halter & Griswold LLP
    Partial “dirt-for-debt” plans in Chapter 11: the “indubitable equivalence” debate
    2011-08-08

    One consequence of the depressed real estate market has been numerous Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases wherein the debtor seeks confirmation of a “dirt-for-debt” plan. In such a plan, instead of paying the secured creditor the value of the real property securing the debt through restructured loan terms, the debtor proposes to convey part or all of the real property securing the debt to the creditor in full satisfaction of its secured claim.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Poyner Spruill LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Debt, Legal burden of proof, Condominium, Conveyancing, Secured creditor, Deed of trust (real estate), Valuation (finance), Ninth Circuit
    Authors:
    Christopher R. Boothe , Lisa P. Sumner
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Poyner Spruill LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 175
    • Page 176
    • Page 177
    • Page 178
    • Current page 179
    • Page 180
    • Page 181
    • Page 182
    • Page 183
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days