Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Post-script – recent Enron “settlement payment” decision has first beneficiary
    2011-08-03

    The Bottom Line:

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bankruptcy, Unsecured debt, Security (finance), Default (finance), Subsidiary, Enron, Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for the Southern District of New York
    Authors:
    Benjamin C. Wolf
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Florida moves quickly to preserve its status as a business-friendly state
    2011-08-02

    Sometimes state legislatures react slowly to judge-made law and sometimes they move swiftly to correct perceived problems created by court rulings. Often, such rash legislative action is not well thought-out or properly drafted, making the solution worse than the fix. However, in Florida, within one legislative session, the Florida Legislature and governor considered and enacted a set of amendments to Florida's limited liability statute that hopefully will signal the business community that Florida knows how to pass laws that make sense.

    Filed under:
    USA, Florida, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Foley & Lardner LLP, Debtor, Fraud, Interest, Limited liability company, Foreclosure, Limited partnership, Dissenting opinion, Federal Trade Commission (USA), Constitutional amendment, Florida Supreme Court
    Authors:
    Mark J. Wolfson
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Foley & Lardner LLP
    Secured lenders have a right to credit bid in bankruptcy -- at least in the Seventh Circuit
    2011-08-02

    Breaking with the Third Circuit and the Fifth Circuit, on June 28, 2011, the Seventh Circuit held that a debtor's plan of reorganization that provides for the sale of the debtor's assets free and clear of an existing security interest may only be confirmed over the objection of its secured creditor if the plan's sale procedure permits the secured creditor to credit bid its secured debt for the assets being sold. River Road Hotel Partners, LLC v. Amalgamated Bank, -- F.3d --, Nos. 10-3597 & 10-3598 (7th Cir. June 28, 2011).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP, Bankruptcy, Credit (finance), Debtor, Collateral (finance), Federal Reporter, Option (finance), Secured creditor, Secured loan, US Code, Title 11 of the US Code, Fifth Circuit, Third Circuit, Seventh Circuit
    Authors:
    Andrew S. Nicoll
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Porter Wright Morris & Arthur LLP
    PBGC finalizes rule for terminating underfunded plans in bankruptcy
    2011-08-01

    On June 14, 2011, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) published its final rule on the termination of an underfunded pension plan when the sponsor is in bankruptcy. The final rule is substantially the same as the proposed rule published in 2008. The Pension Protection Act of 2006 (PPA) amended the rules for a single-employer pension plan termination when the contributing sponsor is in bankruptcy.

    Filed under:
    USA, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren SC, Bankruptcy, Retirement, Subsidy, Sponsor (commercial), Valuation (finance), Disability benefits, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, Pension Protection Act 2006 (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reinhart Boerner Van Deuren SC
    Remand order is not appealable when lower court unmistakenly dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, even though erroneously
    2011-08-01

    TOWNSQUARE MEDIA v. BRILL (July 21, 2011)

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Media & Entertainment, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, Bankruptcy, Summary offence, Remand (court procedure), Non-disclosure agreement, Subject-matter jurisdiction, Supplemental jurisdiction, United States bankruptcy court, Seventh Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
    Decision in crucible materials requires preference claims to contain more than just recitations of the code
    2011-08-01

    Summary

    In a 12 page decision signed July 6, 2011, Judge Walrath of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court granted a motion to dismiss, holding that a complaint that sets forth only conclusory allegations parroting the statutory language of the Bankruptcy Code is insufficient. Judge Walrath’s opinion is available here (the “Opinion”).

    Background

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Debtor, Debt, Constitutional amendment, Title 11 of the US Code, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (USA), Trustee, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    L. John Bird
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Partial “dirt-for-debt” plans in Chapter 11: the “indubitable equivalence” debate
    2011-08-08

    One consequence of the depressed real estate market has been numerous Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases wherein the debtor seeks confirmation of a “dirt-for-debt” plan. In such a plan, instead of paying the secured creditor the value of the real property securing the debt through restructured loan terms, the debtor proposes to convey part or all of the real property securing the debt to the creditor in full satisfaction of its secured claim.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Poyner Spruill LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Debt, Legal burden of proof, Condominium, Conveyancing, Secured creditor, Deed of trust (real estate), Valuation (finance), Ninth Circuit
    Authors:
    Christopher R. Boothe , Lisa P. Sumner
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Poyner Spruill LLP
    Roseton Ol, LLC v. Dynegy Holdings, Inc., C.A. no. 6689-VCP (Del. Ch. July 29, 2011) (Parsons, V.C.)
    2011-08-08

    In this memorandum opinion, the Court of Chancery denied the plaintiffs’ (Roseton OL LLC and Danskammer OL, LLC) motion seeking to temporarily restrain the consummation of a transaction pursuant to which defendant Dynegy Holdings, Inc. (“DHI”) would transfer its most profitable power plants from existing subsidiaries to new bankruptcy remote subsidiaries.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Injunction, Natural gas, Limited liability company, Preliminary injunction, Electricity generation, Line of credit, Subsidiary, Memorandum opinion, Court of Chancery, Delaware Supreme Court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP
    Creditor fraud in bankruptcy proceeding is not a "fraud on the court" for Rule 60 purposes
    2011-08-04

    IN RE: GOLF 255, INC. (July 22, 2011)

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, Bribery, Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Fraud, Discovery, Res judicata and issue estoppel, Mediation, Indian National Congress, Trustee, United States bankruptcy court, Seventh Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
    UK Supreme Court confirms the validity of the 'flip' clause
    2011-08-04

    In its ruling on Wednesday 27 July in the matter of Belmont Park Investments PTY Ltd v BNY Corporate Trustee Services Lte & Anor [2011] UKSC 38 the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom has dismissed the appeal by Lehman Brothers Special Finance Inc. ("LSF") relating to the validity of an alleged anti-deprivation provision known as a 'flip' provision which, has the effect of altering the payment priority order as a result of a bankruptcy of the relevant swap counterparty, in this case Lehman Brothers.

    Filed under:
    USA, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Contractual term, Bankruptcy, Breach of contract, Swap (finance), Good faith, Default (finance), Lehman Brothers, Credit rating agency, Supreme Court of the United States, UK Supreme Court
    Authors:
    Martin Bartlam
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 170
    • Page 171
    • Page 172
    • Page 173
    • Current page 174
    • Page 175
    • Page 176
    • Page 177
    • Page 178
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days