What role might dispute funding play in a complex cross-border dispute involving multiple jurisdictions in Latin America?
On April 11, 2022, Sungard AS New Holdings, LLC and several affiliates have filed a petition for Chapter 11 relief in the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas (Case No. 22-90018). The company reports $500 million to $1 billion in both assets and liabilities.
In this edition of Restructuring Watch, we reflect on the first court decision on the moratorium procedure, some recent schemes and restructuring plans, the lifting of the remaining pandemic-related restrictions for commercial landlords alongside the introduction of the Commercial Rent (Coronavirus) Act 2022 and an extension of the UK directors’ disqualification regime.
Corbin & King: First Judicial Consideration of the CIGA moratorium
Introduction
The Bankruptcy Protector
“Subchapter V is supposed to be a fast process toward plan confirmation, but I don’t see that happening!”
–Comment of a Bankruptcy Judge (as I recall the comment)
It’s true: (i) Subchapter V is supposed to go quickly, but (ii) it often doesn’t.
Here’s why it doesn’t: debtor attorneys often fail to push their cases forward.
Illustration
A bankruptcy court opinion, in a Subchapter V case, illustrates the problem.
There are distinct advantages to investors sitting on the boards of their portfolio companies, not least their ability to look after their investment and work toward maximising their return. The human capital provided by investor directors can be invaluable in driving efficiencies and creating growth opportunities. The interests of investors, investor directors, and the company will generally be aligned in seeking the success of the business.
The financing of commercial litigation has grown enormously since it first appeared on the scene in the US, about 15 years ago. While still small relative to the overall US financial market, it is estimated that more than $11 billion has been invested in litigation finance in the US last year alone. In essence, lenders (often referred to as “funders”) provide commercial claimants and contingency law firms with the capital needed to prosecute legal claims which the funders believe have a strong likelihood of success.
Recently, the Second Circuit became the first federal circuit court to rule that the federal government could deny a Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) loan to a debtor in bankruptcy solely because of an applicant’s bankruptcy status.[1] Prior to the Second Circuit’s decision in Springfield Hospital, Inc. v.
As we previously reported, certain temporary bankruptcy code amendments that Congress originally enacted in connection with the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) expired as of