The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit ruled in October that a creditor’s misconduct must result in harm to other creditors to justify the equitable subordination of a claim under Section 510(c) of the Bankruptcy Code.  

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has held that a nondischargeable debt for malicious and willful injury must include proof of tortious conduct. An intentional breach of contract does not suffice.  

Today, the OCC closed the National Bank of Commerce, Berkley, Illinois and the FDIC was named as receiver. Republic Bank of Chicago, headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with the FDIC to assume all the deposits of National Bank of Commerce.

The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware has ruled that a creditor cannot effect a “triangular” setoff of the amounts owed between it and three affiliated debtors, despite pre-petition contracts that expressly contemplated multiparty setoff. In re SemCrude, L.P., Case No. 08-11525 (BLS), 2009 WL 68873 (Bankr. D. Del. Jan. 9, 2009). The Court relied principally on the plain language of section 553(a) of the United States Bankruptcy Code, which limits setoff to mutual obligations between a debtor and a single nondebtor.

With the state of the economy, some of your customers may be turning into slow pays or, worse, no pays.

Financial advisors, investment bankers, lawyers and other professionals in reorganization cases should pay close attention to a decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit handed down on Jan. 6, 2009. In re Smart World Technologies, LLC, ___ F.3d ___ (2d Cir. 1/6/2009).

The collapse of Lehman Brothers was a major test of the procedures developed by market participants to address counterparty credit risk and has uncovered deficiencies in risk management policies and their application.

When a creditor seeks equitable relief in a bankruptcy court, must the court always follow common law principles of equity? Not according to several courts, including the Second Circuit. Concluding that the granting of equitable remedies may circumvent the Bankruptcy Code's equitable distribution system, courts have limited the application of equitable remedies in the bankruptcy context.

The Court of Appeals of Tennessee confirmed that an equipment lessor is entitled to enforce the “hell or high water” provision of an equipment lease.  

The Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel has held that a finance company did not have a perfected security interest in equipment lease payment pools assigned to it because neither the assignee, nor the assignor with which it had contracted, filed the appropriate UCC financing statements.