Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Pre-disposition notice required to preserve deficiency claim
    2007-11-14

    A decision by the Illinois Court of Appeals reinforces the importance of providing pre-disposition notice to preserve a deficiency claim against an obligor. General Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Stoval, No. 1-06-1858, ____ N.W. 2d ____ (Ill. Ct. App. June 29, 2007).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Foreclosure, Default (finance), Secured creditor, Uniform Commercial Code (USA), Illinois Appellate Court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    Delaware High Court affirms ‘deepening insolvency’ ruling
    2007-11-14

    The Delaware Supreme Court has affirmed, without opinion, a ruling by a lower court that ‘deepening insolvency’ is not a cause of action under Delaware law. Trenwick America Litig. Trust v. Billett, 931 A.2d 438 (Del. 2007).

    The ruling appears to be the strongest nail yet in the coffin of so-called “deepening insolvency” actions.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Public company, Bankruptcy, Surety, Board of directors, Federal Reporter, Limited liability partnership, Debt, Liquidation, Holding company, Subsidiary, Delaware Court of Chancery, Delaware Supreme Court, Third Circuit, Court of equity
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    Allocation of nondebtor’s payment to interest before principal violated bar on collection of post-petition interest
    2007-11-14

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has held that a creditor may not allocate payment by a nondebtor to interest first, before applying the balance to principal—and then seek to collect the remainder of the principal from a jointly liable debtor.

    That strategy violated the Bankruptcy Code’s prohibition against collecting post-petition interest, the court reasoned in National Energy & Gas Transmission, Inc. v. Liberty Electric Power, LLC, No. 06-1459 (4th Cir. July 10, 2007). The majority’s rationale drew a pointed dissent.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Bankruptcy, Surety, Debtor, Natural gas, Interest, Limited liability company, Debt, Electricity, Joint and several liability, TransCanada Corporation, United States bankruptcy court, Fourth Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    US bankruptcy court denies recognition of Cayman insolvency proceedings concerning Bear Stearns funds
    2007-11-14

    Can a United States bankruptcy court deny recognition of a foreign insolvency proceeding even if no one opposes such recognition? In a recent decision, Judge Burton Lifland, a highly respected bankruptcy judge and one of the authors of Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code, says yes.

    Liquidators of Bear Stearns Funds Seek Relief under Chapter 15

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Private Client & Offshore Services, White & Case, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Injunction, Class action, Limited liability company, Liability (financial accounting), Liquidation, Investment funds, Liquidator (law), UNCITRAL, US Congress, Bear Stearns, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    White & Case
    Letter of credit proceeds applied to lease rejection damages
    2007-11-14

    A federal court in California recently has thrown its weight behind a majority rule that holds that letter of credit proceeds should be applied to damages resulting from the rejection of a lease of non-residential real property. In re Connectix Corp., No. 05-556848, 2007 WL 2137802 (Bankr. N.D. Cal. May 10, 2007). The court also addressed the formula the parties should employ to arrive at a damages figure.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Reed Smith LLP, Bankruptcy, Letter of credit, Debtor, Landlord, US Code, Title 11 of the US Code, Trustee
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    Supreme Court finds FCRA liability
    2007-11-14

    The United States Supreme Court held that reckless violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) constitute a willful failure to comply, subjecting violators to liability for actual damages, statutory penalties and potentially punitive damages. Safeco Ins. Co. of America v. Burr, 551 U.S. _____ (June 4, 2007).

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Credit history, Punitive damages, Costs in English law, Letter of credit, Landlord, Leasehold estate, Summary offence, Vehicle insurance, Credit score, Consumer privacy, Fair Credit Reporting Act 1970 (USA), Supreme Court of the United States, Ninth Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    When may a bankruptcy court enjoin proceedings against a non-debtor?
    2007-11-14

    A company attempting to reorganize its affairs in bankruptcy may seek to enjoin its creditors or other third parties from suing members of the company's senior management team during the course of the reorganization proceedings, so that the senior management members can devote their time and resources to the reorganization effort without distraction. Courts throughout the country have applied differing standards in determining when the granting of an injunction of proceedings against a non-debtor is appropriate.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White & Case, Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Debtor, Injunction, Breach of contract, Arbitration clause, Preliminary injunction, Remand (court procedure), Ninth Circuit, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    White & Case
    The examination in aid of execution
    2007-11-18

    In order to get the information necessary to seize a debtor's assets or garnish his income, Rule 60.18 of the Rules of Court permit a creditor to require a debtor to attend an ex­amination under oath be­fore a court reporter and be questioned in relation to:

    (a) the reason for non-payment or non-performance of the judgment;

    (b) the debtor's income and property;

    (c) the debts owed to and by the debtor;

    (d) the disposal the debtor has made of any property either before or after the making of the order;

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McMillan LLP, Debtor, Fraud, Debt, Contempt of court, Collection agency, Capital punishment, Sole proprietorship
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    McMillan LLP
    Oversecured lender's contractual prepayment penalty held enforceable as unsecured claim against solvent debtor
    2007-11-16

    The Court of Appeals for the First Circuit recently held that an oversecured lender holds at least an unsecured claim for contractual prepayment penalties against a solvent debtor. UPS Capital Business Credit v. Gencarelli (In re Gencarelli), 2007 BL 91656 (1st Cir., Aug. 30, 2007). As the court explained, "[t]his is a difficult question that has significant ramifications for the commercial lending industry." Id. at 16.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Statutory interpretation, Interest, Federal Reporter, Remand (court procedure), Secured creditor, Secured loan, Sixth Circuit, First Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Landmark victory for reinsurers of insolvent Integrity Insurance Company
    2007-12-27

    In a matter of first impression under New Jersey law that potentially impacts both the reinsurance and insurance industry and policyholders of insolvent insurance companies, the New Jersey Supreme Court affirmed the appellate division's ruling that the Fourth Amended Final Dividend Plan (the "FDP") proposed by the Liquidator for Integrity Insurance Company ("Integrity") should not be approved because it unlawfully allowed incurred but not reported (“IBNR”) claims to share in the insolvent insurer's estate. See In the Matter of the Liquidation of Integrity Ins.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Locke Lord LLP, Dividends, Reinsurance, Liquidation, Constitution, Supreme Court of the United States, High Court of Justice (England & Wales), New Jersey Supreme Court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Locke Lord LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 1127
    • Page 1128
    • Page 1129
    • Page 1130
    • Current page 1131
    • Page 1132
    • Page 1133
    • Page 1134
    • Page 1135
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days