Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    DFPI orders crypto lender to cease offering unqualified securities
    2022-08-24

    On August 8, the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation (DFPI) issued a desist and refrain order to a now-bankrupt cryptocurrency lender and its CEO after determining that the company allegedly made material misrepresentations and omissions in the offering of crypto interes

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Cryptocurrency
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
    Celsius Update
    2022-08-24

    In the short time since we last provided an update regarding the bankruptcy cases of Celsius Networks LLC and its affiliates (here), there have been a number of material developments to report.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, IT & Data Protection, Litigation, Crowell & Moring LLP, Bankruptcy, Bitcoin, Cryptocurrency, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Frederick (Rick) Hyman , Richard J. Lee
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Crowell & Moring LLP
    U.S. Trustee Fee Program Ruled Unconstitutional
    2022-08-24

    On June 6, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court released its decision in Siegel v. Fitzgerald, No. 21-441. At issue in the case was whether a temporary fee increase for funding of the U.S. Trustee (UST) program was constitutional. These fees were paid by debtors in chapter 11 cases pending or filed between 2018 to 2021. The Court ruled that the fee increase was not constitutional because the increase did not apply uniformly to all cases, thereby violating the uniformity requirement of the Bankruptcy Clause of the Constitution. According to the Executive Office of the U.S.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fredrikson & Byron PA, US Congress, Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    Clinton E. Cutler
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fredrikson & Byron PA
    New Chapter 11 Filing - Carestream Health, Inc.
    2022-08-23

    On August 23, 2022 (the “Petition Date”), Rochester, New York-based Carestream Health, Inc.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cole Schotz PC
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Cole Schotz PC
    Post Siegel Ruling: Tenth Circuit Orders Refunds for Overpayment of U.S. Trustee Fees
    2022-08-19

    The Bankruptcy Protector

    On June 6, 2022, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous ruling in Siegel v. Fitzgerald, 142 S. Ct. 1770 (U.S. June 6, 2022) that the increase in fees payable to the U.S. Trustee system in 2018 violated the uniformity aspect of the Bankruptcy Clause of the Constitution because it was not immediately applicable in the two states with Bankruptcy Administrators rather than U.S. Trustees.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP, Bankruptcy, US Congress, Supreme Court of the United States, Federal Circuit, Tenth Circuit, US Court of Federal Claims
    Authors:
    Shane G. Ramsey
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Nelson Mullins Riley & Scarborough LLP
    A Modified Countryman Test for Multi-party Executory Contracts
    2022-08-22

    In a recent decision, the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held that an agreement between a debtor, a surety, and third-party beneficiaries was not an executory contract and, thus, was ineligible to pass-through the bankruptcy unaffected. The Fifth Circuit, however, adopted a modified Countryman test for muti-party executory contracts. Matter of Falcon V, L.L.C., 2022 WL 3274174 (5th Cir. 2022).

    Background

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dechert LLP, Bankruptcy
    Authors:
    Shmuel Vasser
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Dechert LLP
    Houst Limited Restructuring Plan: High Court Sanctions SME Restructuring Plan to Cram Down HMRC
    2022-08-22

    On 22 July 2022, the English High Court sanctioned Houst Limited’s (“Houst” or the “Company”) restructuring plan (the “Restructuring Plan”), which significantly, is the first time a Restructuring Plan has been used to cram down HM Revenue & Customs (“HMRC”) as preferential creditor.1

    Background

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Trade & Customs, Dechert LLP, Coronavirus, HM Revenue and Customs (UK)
    Authors:
    Alastair Goldrein , Solomon J. Noh , Adam Plainer , Eirene Psomas , Kay Morley
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Dechert LLP
    A Recent Decision in the Toys “R” Us Bankruptcy Litigation May Have An Impact on Board Membership
    2022-08-22

    Key Takeaways

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Gregory K. Jones
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth
    Your Word is Your Bond: Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals Determines Surety Bonds are Not Executory Contracts Even Through Multiparty Approach in In re Falcon V, LLC
    2022-08-22

    Following an August 11, 2022 opinion from the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, certain irrevocable surety bonds will not be considered executory contracts in bankruptcy, even when a court applies a functional multiparty approach to the traditional Countryman definition of an executory contract.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Bracewell LLP, Fifth Circuit
    Authors:
    Jonathan Lozano , Jason G. Cohen
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Bracewell LLP
    Asbestos Trusts May Leave Insurers Out In Cold
    2022-08-22

    Portfolio Media. Inc. | 111 West 19th Street, 5th Floor | New York, NY 10011 | www.law360.com Phone: +1 646 783 7100 | Fax: +1 646 783 7161 | [email protected]

    Asbestos Trusts May Leave Insurers Out In Cold

    By Shane Dilworth

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, US Congress
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 110
    • Page 111
    • Page 112
    • Page 113
    • Current page 114
    • Page 115
    • Page 116
    • Page 117
    • Page 118
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days