Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    FERC Clarifies Its Concurrent Jurisdiction with Regard to Bankruptcy Filings That Seek to Reject Power Purchase Agreements
    2019-01-28

    On January 25, 2019, the US Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC” or “Commission”) issued an order clarifying its position with regard to bankruptcy filings that seek to reject Commission-jurisdictional wholesale power purchase agreements. In response to a petition for a declaratory order and complaint filed by NextEra Energy, Inc. and NextEra Energy Partners, L.P.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Ohio, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Mayer Brown, Power purchase agreement, FERC, Federal Power Act 1920 (USA), US District Court for the Southern District of New York, US District Court for Northern District of Ohio
    Authors:
    J Paul Forrester , Andrew Young
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Mayer Brown
    Some Much Needed Transparency Required on Liquidating Trustees, Liquidating Trusts, Plan Documents, and Other Post-Confirmation Matters
    2016-07-10

    We at The Bankruptcy Cave applaud the recent ruling by Judge Whipple of the Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Ohio, seeking to make the post-confirmation parties, processes, and procedures far more transparent. In In re Affordable Med Scrubs, LLC,[1] Judge Whipple declined to approve a disclosure statement for a debtor’s liquidating plan.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (Bryan Cave), Bankruptcy, Interest, Discovery, Liquidation, Trustee, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for Northern District of Ohio
    Authors:
    Mark I. Duedall
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (Bryan Cave)
    Bankruptcy court clarifies the applicable requirements for severance payments to debtors' former officers
    2010-07-26

    The District Court for the Northern District of Ohio recently clarified the applicable requirements for post-petition severance payments to a debtor’s former officers. In the case of In re: Forum Health, et al.1, the debtor sought authorization from the Court to make a severance payment in the amount of $18,126.00 to its former Chief Executive Officer. The Trustee objected, asserting that the debtor’s motion was not based on a program that was generally applicable to all full-time employees as required by 11 U.S.C. § 503(c)(2)(A).

    Filed under:
    USA, Ohio, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Frost Brown Todd LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Employment contract, Trade union, Severance package, US Code, Chief executive officer, Trustee, US District Court for Northern District of Ohio
    Authors:
    Matthew J. Horwitz
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Frost Brown Todd LLP
    Trustee recovers in fair financial case
    2011-04-04

    The Indiana Lawyer Announced on March 31, 2011, that the Fair Finance Co.’s bankruptcy trustee had reached a $371,000 settlement with an Indianapolis attorney who was accused of defaulting on a 2003 loan from the business. The trustee had sued the Indiana attorney and his wife, saying that the couple failed to pay off a $250,000 loan that matured in 2006. Accrued interest had raised the amount owed to over $370,000.

    Filed under:
    USA, Indiana, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Frost Brown Todd LLP, Default (finance), Accrued interest, Trustee, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for Northern District of Ohio
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Frost Brown Todd LLP
    Failed mitigation efforts do not prevent lessor’s claim
    2008-07-31

    In Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Phar-Mor, Inc.,1 the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that a lessor-claimant whose lease was rejected pursuant to section 365(a) of Title 11 of the Bankruptcy Code was entitled to a claim for future-rent damages against the debtor, even though the lessor had entered into a nearly identical substitute lease. The Court concluded that efforts to mitigate damages by the lessor would not be considered in reducing the actual damage claim when those efforts failed to reduce the actual harm suffered by the lessor.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Breach of contract, Consideration, Liquidated damages, Default (finance), Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, Sixth Circuit, US District Court for Northern District of Ohio
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
    $500 million bankruptcy dispute headed to Sixth Circuit
    2011-07-11

    The FDIC has recently appealed a loss it suffered at trial on the question of whether the debtor in bankruptcy (the holding company of a failed bank) made a “commitment” to maintain the capital of its subsidiary bank under Section 365(o) of the Bankruptcy Code.  After a week-long bench trial with an advisory jury, the Northern District of Ohio rejected the FDIC’s claim that a commitment had been made by the holding company to the Office of Thrift Supervision.  The F

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Holding company, Bench trial, Subsidiary, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (USA), Office of Thrift Supervision, Sixth Circuit, US District Court for Northern District of Ohio
    Authors:
    Pierre H. Bergeron
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    $500 million bankruptcy dispute headed to Sixth Circuit
    2011-07-11

    The FDIC has recently appealed a loss it suffered at trial on the question of whether the debtor in bankruptcy (the holding company of a failed bank) made a “commitment” to maintain the capital of its subsidiary bank under Section 365(o) of the Bankruptcy Code.  After a week-long bench trial with an advisory jury, the Northern District of Ohio rejected the FDIC’s claim that a commitment had been made by the holding company to the Office of Thrift Supervision.  The F

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Holding company, Bench trial, Subsidiary, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (USA), Office of Thrift Supervision, Sixth Circuit, US District Court for Northern District of Ohio
    Authors:
    Pierre H. Bergeron
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    Some Much Needed Transparency Required on Liquidating Trustees, Liquidating Trusts, Plan Documents, and Other Post-Confirmation Matters
    2016-07-10

    We at The Bankruptcy Cave applaud the recent ruling by Judge Whipple of the Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Ohio, seeking to make the post-confirmation parties, processes, and procedures far more transparent. In In re Affordable Med Scrubs, LLC,[1] Judge Whipple declined to approve a disclosure statement for a debtor’s liquidating plan.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (Bryan Cave), Bankruptcy, Interest, Discovery, Liquidation, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for Northern District of Ohio, Trustee
    Authors:
    Mark I. Duedall
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner (Bryan Cave)
    Failed mitigation efforts do not prevent lessor’s claim
    2008-07-31

    In Giant Eagle, Inc. v. Phar-Mor, Inc.,1 the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit held that a lessor-claimant whose lease was rejected pursuant to section 365(a) of Title 11 of the Bankruptcy Code was entitled to a claim for future-rent damages against the debtor, even though the lessor had entered into a nearly identical substitute lease. The Court concluded that efforts to mitigate damages by the lessor would not be considered in reducing the actual damage claim when those efforts failed to reduce the actual harm suffered by the lessor.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Breach of contract, Consideration, Liquidated damages, Default (finance), Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, Sixth Circuit, US District Court for Northern District of Ohio
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days