Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Land contracts: mortgage priority and other complications
    2015-02-20

    Liebzeit v. Intercity State Bank (In re Blanchard), 520 B.R. 740 (Bankr. E.D. Wis. 2014) –

    A Chapter 7 trustee sought to avoid a mortgage on the debtors’ property using the “strong arm” powers of a hypothetical bona fide purchaser of real estate.  The complication was that the debtors sold the real estate on land contract before they granted the mortgage.

    Filed under:
    USA, Wisconsin, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Troutman Pepper, Mortgage loan, Constructive notice
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    Surety bonds: direct claims v derivative claims – who knew?
    2015-02-13

    New Bern Riverfront Dev., LLC v Weaver Cooke Constr., LLC (In re New Bern Riverfront Dev. LLC), 521 B.R. 718 (Bankr. E.D.N.C. 2014) 

    The debtor made claims against a surety that issued a performance bond in connection with a construction contract.  The surety contended that it was not liable for the consequential damage claims.

    Filed under:
    USA, North Carolina, Company & Commercial, Construction, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Troutman Pepper, Bond (finance), Surety
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    Attorney fees: following local law can mean the difference between collecting or not
    2015-02-10

    Southside, LLC v SunTrust Bank (In re Southside, LLC), 520 B.R. 914 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2014) –

    A debtor objected to attorney fees included in the proof of claim filed by a mortgagee, and the mortgagee moved for relief from the automatic stay to exercise its rights under a security deed securing the debtor’s guaranty based in part on the debtor’s lack of equity in the property.

    Filed under:
    USA, Georgia, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Troutman Pepper
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    Lease damage claim: federal or state law – flip a coin?
    2015-02-06

    Broadfoot v. Jamestown Mgmt. Corp. (In re Int’l BioChemical Indus., Inc.), 521 B.R. 395 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 2014) –

    A chapter 7 trustee objected to the claim of a creditor/lessor on the basis that it should be disallowed because the lessor failed to turn over property recoverable using the trustee’s voiding powers, or alternatively, that it constituted a claim for lease termination damages that was subject to a cap.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Troutman Pepper
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    Real estate sales: fixtures can be in the eye of the beholder (a/k/a boilerplate matters)
    2015-02-03

    In re Trackwell, 520 B.R. 788 (Bankr. W.D. Mo. 2014) –

    The successful bidder at a bankruptcy auction of a ranch claimed that a cattle chute was included in the sold assets.  The debtors disagreed.  Resolution of the dispute turned on whether the cattle chute constituted a fixture that was part of the real estate.

    Filed under:
    USA, Missouri, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Troutman Pepper, Personal property
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    Real estate cases: you may want to think twice before you file
    2015-01-30

    Branch Bank & Trust Co. v. Michael’s Enterprises of Virginia, Inc. (In re Michael’s Enterprises of Virginia, Inc.), 519 B.R. 916 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 2014)  –

    A mortgage lender sought sanctions against the debtor, its sole shareholder and its attorney.  It alleged that the bankruptcy petition was filed for an improper purpose.

    Filed under:
    USA, Virginia, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Troutman Pepper, Debtor, Foreclosure
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    Real estate cases: bad faith filing does not necessarily mean that you are a bad person
    2015-01-27

    n re Sterling Bluff Investors, LLC, 515 B.R. 902 (Bankr. S.D. Ga. 2014) –

    A mortgagee moved to dismiss a real estate debtor’s chapter 11 case, or in the alternative for relief from the automatic stay.  It contended that the debtor filed bankruptcy in bad faith, and that this was a “single asset real estate” case subject to special provisions regarding its entitlement to relief from the stay.

    Filed under:
    USA, Georgia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Troutman Pepper, Bad faith
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    Post-confirmation: ignoring court orders is not a good idea
    2015-01-23

    In re Castle Home Builders, Inc., 520 B.R. 98 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2014) –

    The debtors obtained confirmation of plans of reorganization that restructured prepetition mortgage loans.  When the servicer for some of the loans continued to ignore the terms of the plans, the reorganized debtors sought enforcement of the court’s confirmation order and sanctions.

    Filed under:
    USA, Illinois, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Troutman Pepper, Debtor
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    Bankruptcy sales: “it ain’t over ’til it’s over”
    2015-01-20

    Great Plains Royalty Corp. v. Earl Schwartz Co. (In re Great Plains Royalty Corp.), 520 B.R. 292 (Bankr. D. N.D. 2014) –

    Filed under:
    USA, North Dakota, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Troutman Pepper, Bankruptcy, Debtor
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    UCC collateral description: more may not be better
    2015-01-13

    Ring v. First Niagara Bank, N.A. (In re Sterling United, Inc.), 519 B.R. 586 (Bankr. W.D.N.Y. 2014) –

    A chapter 7 trustee sought to recover as preferences payments made by the debtor to a lender and proceeds of collateral liquidation received by the lender based on arguments regarding whether UCC financing statements adequately perfected the lender’s security interests.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Troutman Pepper, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Uniform Commercial Code (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 13
    • Page 14
    • Page 15
    • Page 16
    • Current page 17
    • Page 18
    • Page 19
    • Page 20
    • Page 21
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days