U.S. Supreme Court decision answers question arising out of Stern vs. Marshall decision

In Executive Benefits Insurance Agency, petitioner vs.  Peter H. Arkison, Chapter 7 Trustee, Case No. 12-1200, 573 U.S. __(2014) the United States Supreme Court  ( Court) delivered its opinion as a follow up to its landmark decision in Stern v. Marshall.  In Stern v.

Filed under:
USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Duane Morris LLP, Bankruptcy, Tortious interference, Article III US Constitution, SCOTUS, United States bankruptcy court
Authors:
Walter J. Greenhalgh
Location:
USA
Firm:
Duane Morris LLP