Key Point
There is no assumption under English law that, where a company appeals against a winding-up order, it should give security for costs.
The Facts
Key Points
- Receivers only owe a duty of care to those parties who hold an interest in the equity of redemption.
- Upon the making of a bankruptcy order, the bankrupt ceases to participate in any such interest and the equity of redemption vests in the trustee in bankruptcy.
The Facts
Key Points
- An administrator may be able appeal an order restoring a company following dissolution
- The court has jurisdiction to backdate a winding up order made following restoration to the date of dissolution
- The court must exercise its discretion to do so with extreme caution
The Facts
Client Connection Limited (“Company”) was placed into administration and Ms Sharma (“A”) was appointed as administrator. Following a pre-pack sale of the business of the Company, A moved the Company to dissolution.
On 22 April 2015, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Jetivia SA v Bilta (UK) Limited, unanimously holding that where a company has been the victim of wrong-doing by its directors, that wrong-doing should not be attributed to the company so as to afford the directors an illegality defence.
The result is clear and not a surprising one. The judgments are less clear however. The Court highlighted the difficulties in developing illegality principles of general application for future cases, but then decided now was not the time to try.
There have been a couple of cases in the last few months where the impact of changes to the details of the various registers at Companies House has been considered by a Court. This article considers the points of interest for lenders that arise out of those decisions
What use is an LP registration certificate?
Not much in the case of a certificate that relates to a limited partnership (one to which the Limited Partnership Act 1907 applies not the limited liability partnership variety).
Key Point
The High Court has given some guidance on the effect of an order to restore a dissolved company to the register where a secured creditor has rights against that company and there has been a disclaimer by the Crown.
Facts
Key Point
Judgment sets out the rationale behind validating three payments made by a Company after the presentation of a winding up petition.
The Facts
This was the third application made by Sahaviriya Steel Industries UK Limited (the “Company”) in connection with payments made that would require validation under s127 Insolvency Act 1986. The payments were necessary to keep part of its business going pending discussions on sale or restructuring.
The Decision
Key Points
- Court considers the ownership of assets situated at premises owned by the bankrupt in the context of limited relevant evidence
- Court emphasises the importance of joining the correct parties to litigation
The Facts
EAD Solicitors LLP and others v Abrams UKEAT/0054/15
Why care?
Section 13(1) of the Equality Act 2010 defines direct discrimination as occurring where “because of a protected characteristic”, a person (A) treats another (B) less favourably than A treats or would treat others. This wording means that B does not have to have the protected characteristic.
Key Point
An English Court holds that a rate saving scheme involving liquidations of tenant companies is an abuse of the English insolvency legislation.
The Facts