Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Supreme Court of Canada confirms priority status of restructuring charges over CRA deemed trusts
    2021-08-05

    The Supreme Court of Canada (“SCC”) has released its decision in Canada North, conclusively resolving the priority dispute between deemed trusts created under the federal “fiscal statutes” (being the Income Tax Act (the “ITA”), the

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), Supreme Court of Canada
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Indalex priority case decided — Ontario Court of Appeal gives priority to pension plan deficiency over secured lenders
    2011-04-08

    This week, the Ontario Court of Appeal surprised many by deciding that in the context of the CCAA proceedings of Indalex, pension plan deficiency claims can have priority over security held by secured DIP lenders. The Court granted priority for the entire wind-up deficiency of two pension plans over the DIP lender’s security. If not reversed on appeal, the ruling creates a potential worst case scenario for secured lenders in Ontario and could affect availability of credit for all employers who provide defined benefit pension plans for their employees.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Conflict of interest, Credit (finance), Debtor, Fiduciary, Stakeholder (corporate), Defined benefit pension plan, Parent company, Secured loan, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Court of Appeal of England & Wales, Supreme Court of Canada, Court of Appeal for Ontario
    Authors:
    Kevin P. McElcheran
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    2020 Year in Review: Highlights in Canadian Restructuring Law
    2021-01-20

    In a year quite unlike any other, the landscape of Canadian restructuring law saw significant developments in 2020. The COVID-19 crisis put novel issues before the courts, challenged businesses in unforeseen ways and saw various supports and concessions offered to struggling businesses from governments and creditors. Ultimately, while the supports and concessions enabled many businesses to avoid insolvency proceedings in 2020, many others sought the protection of an insolvency filing, with industries such as the retail industry particularly impacted.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Coronavirus, Supreme Court of Canada
    Authors:
    Heather L. Meredith , Walker W. MacLeod , Gabriel Faure
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Creativity in the courts: use of the CCAA to address asset-backed commercial paper crisis
    2008-10-31

    The Ontario Court of Appeal has approved a creative use of the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) designed to unfreeze the $32-billion Canadian market for asset-backed commercial paper (ABCP).

    As has been widely publicized, the Canadian ABCP market froze in August 2007 as a result of concerns in world credit markets arising from the US subprime mortgage crisis. After the market froze, a Pan-Canadian Investors Committee was formed to attempt to restructure it.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Securitization & Structured Finance, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Bond market, Secured loan, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), Royal Bank of Canada, Supreme Court of Canada, Court of Appeal for Ontario, Ontario Superior Court of Justice
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Highlights of 2019 Canadian Restructuring Law
    2020-01-13

    2019 was a busy year for corporate restructuring practitioners in Canada. The year saw an uptick in CCAA filings nationwide, with 38 total proceedings (up from the total of 21 filings in 2018). The Canadian restructuring landscape also some significant shake-ups, with important decisions and extensive legislative changes. The highlights are summarized below:

    BIA & CCAA Amended

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Debtor, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Supreme Court of Canada, Court of Appeal for Ontario, Court of Appeal of Alberta, Quebec Court of Appeal
    Authors:
    Alexander Steele
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Redwater - SCC Delivers the Final Word
    2019-02-04

    On February 1, 2019, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) released its highly anticipated decision in the Orphan Well Association, et al. v. Grant Thornton Limited, et al, 2019 SCC 5 (Redwater).

    Filed under:
    Canada, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Supreme Court of Canada, Court of Appeal of Alberta
    Authors:
    Sean F. Collins , Walker W. MacLeod
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Highlights of 2018 Canadian Restructuring Law
    2019-01-16

    While 2018 saw a slight decrease in nationwide CCAA filings (with 19 total cases commenced, compared to 23 in 2017), there were a number of important decisions rendered throughout the country. The highlights are summarized below:

    Supreme Court of Canada clarifies Crown priority for GST claims

    Filed under:
    Canada, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Royal Bank of Canada, Supreme Court of Canada
    Authors:
    Walker W. MacLeod
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Supreme Court of Canada Rules in Favour of Lenders in Callidus
    2018-11-13

    In a 2017 judgment discussed here, the Federal Court of Appeal permitted the CRA to assert a claim against a secured creditor who had received a repayment from its borrower prior to bankruptcy when the borrower also owed unremitted GST obligations to the Crown.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Supreme Court of Canada
    Authors:
    Walker W. MacLeod
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Supreme Court of Canada restores super-priority of DIP lenders in CCAA proceedings
    2013-02-01

     

    In (Re) Indalex, the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) affirmed the super-priority of the security granted to a debtor-in-possession (DIP) lender, over a deemed trust created under provincial pension legislation, in the context of a Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) proceeding. The SCC’s analysis leaves open further issues.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Norton Rose Fulbright, Fiduciary, Supreme Court of Canada
    Authors:
    Mario Forte , Daniel Pearlman
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
    SCC confirms no crown priority for unremitted GST/QST in a bankruptcy
    2009-12-10

    On October 30, 2009, the Supreme Court of Canada released its long-anticipated decision in Quebec (Revenue) v. Caisse populaire Desjardins de Montmagny. At issue in this case (and two companion cases) was the legal characterization of Crown rights with respect to collected but unremitted GST and Quebec sales tax (QST) in the hands of a trustee in bankruptcy. The Supreme Court confirmed that the Crown is an ordinary unsecured creditor with respect to such amounts, subject to the rights of prior ranking security holders.

    Summary of Facts

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Norton Rose Fulbright, Bankruptcy, Accounts receivable, Tax deduction, Secured creditor, Unsecured creditor, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), SCOTUS, Supreme Court of Canada
    Authors:
    Virginie Gauthier
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 23
    • Page 24
    • Page 25
    • Page 26
    • Page 27
    • Page 28
    • Page 29
    • Page 30
    • Current page 31
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days