Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Second Circuit allows post-bankruptcy legal fees based on pre-bankruptcy indemnity agreement
    2009-11-13

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held on Nov. 5, 2009, that a creditor was entitled to its post-bankruptcy legal fees incurred on a pre-bankruptcy indemnity agreement. Ogle v. Fid. & Deposit Co. of Md., __F.3d __, No. 09-0691-bk, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 24329 (2d Cir. Nov. 5, 2009). Affirming the lower courts, the Second Circuit explained that the Bankruptcy Code (“Code”) “interposes no bar . . . to recovery.” Id. at *8-9 (citing Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. of Am. v. Pac. Gas & Elec. Co., 549 U.S.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Federal Reporter, Default (finance), Substantive law, Attorney's fee, Unsecured creditor, Eighth Circuit, Second Circuit, Ninth Circuit
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook , Lawrence V. Gelber , Adam C. Harris , David M. Hillman , Brian D. Pfeiffer
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    New York law applies to all claims in the Midland Insurance Company liquidation proceeding
    2010-03-17

    In this long-running legal saga surrounding the liquidation of Midland Insurance Company (“Midland”), the Superintendent of Insurance, Midland’s reinsurers, and certain major policyholders stipulated to a case management order for determining the issue of whether New York substantive law controlled the interpretation of the Midland insurance policies at issue or whether the New York choice-of-law test must be conducted for each policy to determine the applicable substantive law.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Jorden Burt LLP, Reinsurance, Liquidation, Substantive law, New York State Insurance Department
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jorden Burt LLP
    Second Circuit allows post-bankruptcy legal fees based on pre-bankruptcy indemnity agreement
    2009-11-13

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held on Nov. 5, 2009, that a creditor was entitled to its post-bankruptcy legal fees incurred on a pre-bankruptcy indemnity agreement. Ogle v. Fid. & Deposit Co. of Md., __F.3d __, No. 09-0691-bk, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 24329 (2d Cir. Nov. 5, 2009). Affirming the lower courts, the Second Circuit explained that the Bankruptcy Code (“Code”) “interposes no bar . . . to recovery.” Id. at *8-9 (citing Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co. of Am. v. Pac. Gas & Elec. Co., 549 U.S.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Federal Reporter, Default (finance), Substantive law, Attorney's fee, Unsecured creditor, Eighth Circuit, Second Circuit, Ninth Circuit
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook , Lawrence V. Gelber , Adam C. Harris , David M. Hillman , Brian D. Pfeiffer
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Oversecured creditor wins default interest issue
    2008-07-16

    The Ninth Circuit held on July 3, 2008, that an oversecured creditor’s claim for payment was entitled to a “presumption in favor of the loan agreement’s default rate (an additional 2% interest), subject only to reduction based upon any equities involved.” General Elec. Capt’l Corp. v. Future Media Productions, Inc., 2008 WL2610459, *2 (9th Cir. 7/3/08). Reversing the lower courts, the Court of Appeals held that the bankruptcy court had improperly applied a questionable Ninth Circuit precedent when denying the lender a default rate of interest. Id., at *4.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Costs in English law, Debtor, Interest, Federal Reporter, Remand (court procedure), Default (finance), Substantive law, Secured loan, Ninth Circuit, United States bankruptcy court, Fifth Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • Page 1
    • Current page 2
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days