Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Palmer v. Paul Miller Ford, Inc. (In re Lainhart)
    2017-02-06

    (Bankr. E.D. Ky. Feb. 2, 2017)

    The bankruptcy court enters summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff trustee. The trustee sought to obtain title to a truck sold to the debtor prepetition by the defendant dealer. The dealer had not provided a certificate of title, but the debtor did receive physical possession of the truck pursuant to a bona fide sale. The court finds in favor of the trustee after applying Kentucky’s comprehensive automated motor vehicle registration and titling system contained in KRS §§ 186A.010-186A.990. Opinion below.

    Judge: Schaaf

    Filed under:
    USA, Kentucky, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
    Authors:
    Matt Lindblom
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
    Nelson v. Taylor (In re Taylor)
    2016-12-05

    (Bankr. E.D. Ky. Nov. 28, 2016)

    The bankruptcy court enters summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs in this 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6) nondischargeability action. The plaintiffs had obtained a state court default judgment against the debtor for damages caused to them when the debtor drove to their home and shot one of the plaintiffs and injured the other plaintiff with flying debris. The court holds that collateral estoppel bars the debtor from relitigating the issue of whether the debtor caused a willful and malicious injury to the plaintiffs. Opinion below.

    Judge: Wise

    Filed under:
    USA, Kentucky, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
    Authors:
    Matt Lindblom
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
    In re Smith
    2016-10-10

    (Bankr. S.D. Ind. Oct. 6, 2016)

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
    Authors:
    Matt Lindblom
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
    In re Beath
    2016-08-03

    (Bankr. S.D. Ind. July 29, 2016)

    The bankruptcy court denies the debtor’s motion to transfer venue of his chapter 7 bankruptcy case from the Terra Haute Division to the Evansville Division. The debtor failed to satisfy the standard set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1412 for venue transfer. The debtor’s travel time to each court location was virtually the same, and thus Evansville was no more convenient than Terra Haute. Further, there was no showing that the interests of justice would be better served by the transfer. Opinion below.

    Judge: Graham

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC, Debtor, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Matt Lindblom
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
    In re Licking River Mining, LLC
    2016-06-08

    (Bankr. E.D. Ky. June 6, 2016)

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Matt Lindblom
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
    Bush v. United States (In re Bush)
    2016-04-11

    (Bankr. S.D. Ind. Apr. 8, 2016)

    The bankruptcy court addresses whether certain tax penalty claims are dischargeable. The court finds certain penalties are dischargeable because they arose out of tax returns filed outside the three-year window provided in 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(7). However, other penalties were not dischargeable because they arose out of a tax return filed within the three-year window. Opinion below.

    Judge: Carr

    Attorney for Debtors: Camden & Meridew, P.C., Julie A. Camden

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Matt Lindblom
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
    Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. T.D. Investments, LLP (In re Great Lakes Quick Lube LP)
    2016-03-14

    (7th Cir. Mar. 11, 2016)

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC, United States bankruptcy court, Seventh Circuit
    Authors:
    Matt Lindblom
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
    In re Robinson
    2016-02-05

    (7th Cir. Feb. 4, 2016)

    The Seventh Circuit affirms the district court’s reversal of the bankruptcy court. The debtor claimed an exemption for a rare first edition Book of Mormon under Illinois’s exemption statutes, which permit an exemption for “a bible.” The trustee argued that the debtor should be permitted only to exempt one of the debtor’s other copies, because the rare copy was worth approximately $10,000 and, the trustee argued, the statute was being misused in this case. The court holds that the plain wording of the statute permitted the claimed exemption. Opinion below.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC, Seventh Circuit
    Authors:
    Matt Lindblom
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
    In re Lexington Hospitality Group, LLC
    2017-11-06

    (Bankr. E.D. Ky. Nov. 1, 2011)

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
    Authors:
    Matt Lindblom
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
    Gargula v. Cox (In re Cox)
    2017-09-13

    (Bankr. S.D. Ind. Sep. 7, 2017)

    The bankruptcy court enters judgment in favor of the debtor, granting a discharge in her bankruptcy case. The U.S. Trustee brought the action under § 727(a)(2)(B) and (a)(4)(A), alleging the debtor intentionally failed to disclose $5,000 she held in a lockbox on the petition date. The Court finds the debtor did not have the requisite intent and was unsure of what she was supposed to do at the 341 meeting based on a misunderstanding or miscommunication with her lawyer. Opinion below.

    Judge: Carr

    Filed under:
    USA, Indiana, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
    Authors:
    Matt Lindblom
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 32
    • Page 33
    • Page 34
    • Page 35
    • Current page 36
    • Page 37
    • Page 38
    • Page 39
    • Page 40
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days