(Bankr. E.D. Ky. Jan. 6, 2017)
The bankruptcy court overrules the creditor’s objection to confirmation of the Chapter 13 plan. The creditor argued its claim, secured by the debtors’ mobile home, should be increased by the cost of delivery and set-up of the home. The court holds that set-up and delivery costs may not be used as a means to increase the replacement value as a matter of law. Opinion below.
Judge: Wise
Attorney for Debtor: Daryle M. Ronning
Attorneys for Creditor: McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie & Kirkland, Zachary A. Horn
(6th Cir. B.A.P. Nov. 7, 2016)
(Bankr. W.D. Ky. Sep. 16, 2016)
(W.D. Ky. July 7, 2016)
(U.S. Sup. Ct. May 16, 2016)
(W.D. Ky. Mar. 31, 2016)
The district court affirms the bankruptcy court’s decision finding that Seven Counties Services, Inc. was permitted to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy relief because it was not a “governmental unit” as defined in the bankruptcy code. Further, the debtor’s contract with KERS was properly deemed an executory contract that could be rejected by the debtor. The court makes one factual correction to the record, but the bankruptcy court’s decision is affirmed in all other respects. Opinion below.
Judge: Hale
(Bankr. S.D. Ind. Feb. 24, 2016)
(Bankr. W.D. Ky. Oct. 16, 2017)
The bankruptcy court overrules the Chapter 7 trustee’s objection to the debtor’s claimed exemption. The debtor moved to reopen her case, add a personal injury cause of action to her schedules, and claim an exemption in a portion of the recovery on the cause of action. The court holds that Law v. Siegel is applicable, and thus the court does not have authority to deny the exemption even if bad faith exists. Opinion below.
Judge: Lloyd
Attorney for Debtor: Darren K. Mexic
Trustee: Jerry Burns
(Bankr. S.D. Ind. Aug. 21, 2017)
(Bankr. S.D. Ind. June 26, 2017)
The bankruptcy court dismisses without prejudice the debtor’s complaint against a foreclosing creditor because the court concludes it lacks subject matter jurisdiction. The debtor filed the complaint alleging numerous causes of action, including violations of the automatic stay. However, the alleged acts occurred at a time when the subject property was no longer property of the estate. Opinion below.
Judge: Carr
Attorneys for Debtor: Sabin, Shea & Des Jardines LLC, J. Andrew Sabin