Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Cross Border Restructuring and Insolvency Update - December 2016
    2016-12-22

    ECJ decides that rights in rem should be interpreted in accordance with German law, despite insolvency proceedings having been opened in France

    In the recent case of SCI Senior Home (in Administration) v Gemeinde Wedemark, Hannoversche Volksbank eG, the Court of Justice of the European Union handed down judgment on the question of whether a right in rem created under national law should be considered a "right in rem" for the purposes of Article 5 of the Council Regulation (EC) 1346/2000 on insolvency proceedings (the "Insolvency Regulation").

    Filed under:
    European Union, Singapore, United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Ashfords LLP, European Commission, Court of Justice of the European Union
    Authors:
    Alan Bennett , Olivia Bridger , Rachel Maddocks
    Location:
    European Union, Singapore, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Ashfords LLP
    Financial litigation roundup - Spring 2015
    2015-05-26

    ADVISORY | DISPUTES | TRANSACTIONS Financial Litigation roundup Spring 2015 Welcome to the latest edition of our Financial Litigation roundup. In this edition, we consider recent judgments and ongoing cases from the banking and financial world in the UK and Asia, as well as regulatory developments across those jurisdictions. English judgments SPL Private Finance (PF1) IC Limited and others v Arch Financial Products LLP and others; SPL Private Finance (PF2) IC Ltd and other v Robin Farrell. more> McWilliam v Norton Finance (UK) Ltd (in liquidation).

    Filed under:
    European Union, Hong Kong, Singapore, United Kingdom, Banking, Capital Markets, Corporate Finance/M&A, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, RPC
    Location:
    European Union, Hong Kong, Singapore, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    RPC
    Cross Border Restructuring and Insolvency Update - March 2017
    2017-04-03

    Budniok v Adjudicator, Insolvency Service [2017] EWHC 368 (Ch)

    Chief Registrar Baister overturned the Adjudicator's decision in refusing to grant a Bankruptcy Order where the Debtor's COMI was an issue.

    Mr Budniok, a German citizen who had recently moved to London, applied online for a Bankruptcy Order in England. After several requests for further information, the Adjudicator was not satisfied Mr Budniok's centre of main interests ("COMI") was in England and as such refused the application. Mr Budniok appealed.

    Filed under:
    Germany, Hong Kong, Singapore, United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Ashfords LLP, Court of Appeal of England & Wales, High Court of Justice (England & Wales)
    Authors:
    Alan Bennett
    Location:
    Germany, Hong Kong, Singapore, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Ashfords LLP
    Relief in the Time of COVID-19 - Temporary Measures
    2020-04-14

    New legislation suspends contractual obligations for the next six months with related disputes subject to a separate dispute resolution system.

    On 7 April 2020, the Singapore Parliament passed the COVID-19 (Temporary Measures) Act (the Act) offering temporary relief to businesses and individuals who are unable to fulfil their contractual obligations because of COVID-19 and providing temporary amendments to bankruptcy and insolvency laws. The Act went into effect immediately.

    Filed under:
    Singapore, Insolvency & Restructuring, Latham & Watkins LLP, Coronavirus
    Authors:
    Farhana Sharmeen , Marc Jia Renn Tan
    Location:
    Singapore
    Firm:
    Latham & Watkins LLP
    An update on the measures being taken to reduce the business impact in Singapore, and an outline of the way in which the courts will meet the challenge it poses
    2020-04-15

    This briefing looks at the measures being taken by the Singapore government to support businesses and meet the challenges posed by Covid-19, with the introduction of the Covid-19 (Temporary Measures) Act 2020 (the Act)1, and the Registrar's Circular No, 4 of 2020: Updates on Measures Relating to Covid-192, focussing on:

    Filed under:
    Singapore, Company & Commercial, Construction, Insolvency & Restructuring, Shipping & Transport, HFW, Due diligence, Force majeure, Coronavirus
    Authors:
    Nicola Gare
    Location:
    Singapore
    Firm:
    HFW
    Covid-19 Singapore: guide to (temporary measures) act 2020
    2020-04-08

    The COVID-19 (Temporary Measures) Act (the Act) will have a considerable impact on the enforcement of certain contracts and commercial disputes in Singapore for the next 6 to 12 months. The Act was passed by the Singapore Parliament, and commenced on the same day, 7 April 2020.

    The key measures of the Act are:

    Filed under:
    Singapore, Arbitration & ADR, Banking, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Clyde & Co LLP, Force majeure, Coronavirus
    Authors:
    Ian Roberts , Prakash Pillai
    Location:
    Singapore
    Firm:
    Clyde & Co LLP
    COVID-19 Insolvency: Considerations for the Singapore (Temporary Measures) Act
    2020-04-08

    The Act is meant to give temporary relief to financially distressed individuals, firms and businesses who are facing challenges imposed by COVID-19 but who are otherwise viable and profitable.

    It is unsurprising that many of the Act’s sections expressly refer to the relevant provisions of the personal and corporate insolvency legislation applicable in Singapore. In this regard, it is noteworthy that the Act refers expressly to the Insolvency, Restructuring and Dissolution Act (“IRDA”). This warrants some explanation.

    Filed under:
    Singapore, Insolvency & Restructuring, Clyde & Co LLP, Coronavirus
    Authors:
    Prakash Pillai , Junxiang Koh
    Location:
    Singapore
    Firm:
    Clyde & Co LLP
    The impact of the covid-19 (temporary measures) act on commercial litigation and insolvency matters
    2020-04-08

    On 7 April 2020, the Singapore government passed a wide-ranging bill (the “Act”) providing temporary relief for parties who are unable to fulfil contractual obligations due to the Covid19 crisis.

    The Act covers certain contractual obligations to be performed for the period 1 February 2020 to 1 August 2020 (both dates inclusive) (“Relief Period”).

    This update sets out the legal implications for commercial litigation and insolvency matters.

    A. COMMERCIAL LITIGATION

    Filed under:
    Singapore, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Providence Law, Coronavirus
    Authors:
    Nawaz Kamil , Zhuo Jiaxiang , Danny Quah
    Location:
    Singapore
    Firm:
    Providence Law
    Singapore will Introduce COVID-19 (Temporary Measures) Bill
    2020-04-02

    The Singapore Ministry of Law will introduce the COVID-19 (Temporary Measures) Bill (the Bill) in Parliament next week to address the impact of COVID-19 on businesses and individuals' ability to fulfil their contractual obligations. The Bill will also make some temporary changes relating to bankruptcy and insolvency.

    The Bill will apply to various categories of contracts, including:

    Filed under:
    Singapore, Banking, Company & Commercial, Construction, Insolvency & Restructuring, Leisure & Tourism, Public, Trade & Customs, Baker McKenzie, Coronavirus
    Authors:
    Nandakumar Ponniya , Wong Tjen Wee
    Location:
    Singapore
    Firm:
    Baker McKenzie
    COVID-19: Singapore’s COVID-19 (Temporary Measure) Bill: What is it? How does it impact you?
    2020-04-06

    COVID-19 has had impacts on contracts relating to commercial undertakings (e.g., construction projects), commercial and industrial tenancies, and individual consumer transactions (e.g. bookings for events). Individuals or companies who are unable to meet their obligations may have to pay damages or forfeit deposits. Otherwise stable businesses may be sued and face lengthy litigation or possible insolvency.

    Filed under:
    Singapore, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Real Estate, K&L Gates LLP, Landlord, Coronavirus
    Authors:
    M Rajaram , Valerie Ang , Muralli Raja Rajaram
    Location:
    Singapore
    Firm:
    K&L Gates LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 25
    • Page 26
    • Page 27
    • Page 28
    • Current page 29
    • Page 30
    • Page 31
    • Page 32
    • Page 33
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days