The so-called 20-day administrative priority claim (set forth in Section 503(b)(9) of the Bankruptcy Code) is perhaps the best remedy available to vendor creditors in Chapter 11 cases.
David Conaway [email protected] 704.945.2149 Manufacturing Customers Vendors Supply Chain Insolvency Litigation Commercial and Financial Contracts Cross-Border
BACKGROUND
It’s no secret that Kmart is facing another liquidity crisis. Just over ten years after Sears rescued the discount retailer from bankruptcy in 2006, the pioneer of the “blue light special” is destined for another, and perhaps last, going out of business sale. Earlier this year, the company publicly disclosed its inability to avoid insolvency stating: “Our historical operating results indicate substantial doubt exists related to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.” In other words, Kmart knows its heading for that blue light special in the sky.
Under Section 521(a)(2)(A) of the federal bankruptcy code, a debtor in a chapter 7 bankruptcy must file a statement within 30 days of the bankruptcy filing notifying the court, creditors and the trustee whether the debtor intends to retain or surrender property encumbered by a mortgage. In its October, 2016 decision in the case of In re Failla, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, in affirming rulings from the bankruptcy court and the federal district court, held that once a chapter 7 debtor elects to "surrender" mortgaged property, he is precluded from thereafter opposing
In Reichhold Holdings US, Inc., on August 24, 2016, the Delaware Bankruptcy Court ruled that a vendor's reclamation trumped a lender's lien on inventory, arising from a post-petition DIP loan (that was used to repay the prepetition loan).
Generally, reclamation claims are subject to existing liens on inventory. However, where a prior loan is paid, the underlying liens are extinguished, and the existing reclamation claim becomes the first "lien" on the inventory. Liens arising from a subsequent DIP loan are junior to the pre-existing reclamation claim.
Companies that sell goods or extend credit to customers expect to be paid. When customers become insolvent, or file for Chapter 11 protection, those expectations are no longer realistic. Yet, there are a number of "creditor remedies" that can be utilized to maximize recovery from the insolvent customer. This article addresses one such "remedy": a carve-out from the pre-petition secured lender.
Certain North American based affiliates of Essar Steel Ltd (Mumbai) have today filed Chapter 11 and Chapter 15 petitions in Delaware. ESML Holdings Inc. and Essar Steel Minnesota LLC have filed Chapter 11 proceedings in Delaware. The following entities filed Chapter 15 petitions in Delaware: Essar Steel Algoma Inc. USA, Essar Steel Algoma Inc., Cannelton Iron Ore Company, Essar Steel Algoma (Alberta) ULC, Essar Tech Algoma Inc.
In Bankruptcy Code Section 363 sales of assets, there are winners and losers.
Chapter 11 is known as a forum for reorganizing or selling a financially distressed business. If a Chapter 11 reorganization is not possible, a sale of assets may create investment opportunities for strategic buyers, investment banks, and private equity to take advantage of the “distress” normally associated with Chapter 11 to acquire assets at a discount, exemplifying Warren Buffet’s “value” buying.
Picture the scene: You have just received word that your customer has filed Chapter 11. You had followed my ad-vice (see article Reducing a Customer’s Accounts Receiva-ble in the Zone of Insolvency), and put the customer on a cash-before-delivery basis and demanded assurances of performance. You were successful in reducing the ac-counts receivable owed, and avoiding preference liability in doing so.
The customer, now a Chapter 11 debtor, calls and de-mands that you continue to ship, and resume credit terms.
The 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued an important preference decision on August 10, 2015.
What You Need to Know
Payments to creditors arising from a recent, single business transaction can be protected by the ordinary course of business defense.
C.W. Mining Company Case
The debtor C.W. Mining Company was failing. In an attempt to survive, it decided to try something new, specifically to increase coal production by converting its mining operations from continuous mining to a long wall system.