Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Enforceability opinions – the ongoing need for indemnities
    2010-04-14

    In dealing with collateral provided by a third party to support the obligations of the prime debtor, lenders and their counsel need to remember the impact of the federal Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act.

    Ontario’s Personal Property Security Act (PPSA) was amended to broaden the definition of the word “debtor.” However, the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act’s (BIA) definition of a “secured creditor” is still restricted to a person holding a charge or a lien “as security for debt due or accruing to the person (lender) holding the debt.”

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Miller Thomson LLP, Shareholder, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Interest, Debt, Secured creditor, Secured loan, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Uniform Commercial Code (USA), Personal Property Security Act 1990 (Canada)
    Authors:
    Jennifer Babe , Andre Kuyntjes
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Miller Thomson LLP
    Update on the Wage Earner Protection Program Act
    2009-12-03

    As we previously wrote about (Volume 1, Issue 3, December 2008), the Wage Earner Protection Program Act (“WEPPA”) came into force on July 7, 2008 as part of a comprehensive reform package to the Bankruptcy & Insolvency Act (“BIA”). WEPPA was designed to protect the wages of employees terminated as a result of a bankruptcy or receivership. Employees could now claim up to $3,000 worth of wages earned in the six months immediately preceding the bankruptcy or receivership, as well as a $2,000 super priority claim on all current assets of their employer.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Miller Thomson LLP, Wage, Bankruptcy, Unsecured debt, Trade union, Secured creditor, Severance package, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), Employment Standards Act 2000 (Ontario) (Canada), Court of Appeal of England & Wales
    Authors:
    Joseph Marin , Eric Sherkin
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Miller Thomson LLP
    Bankruptcy and insolvency law amendments declared in force
    2009-12-03

    After years of waiting, significant amendments to the Canadian regime of bankruptcy and insolvency law were declared in force as of September 18, 2009 (Amendments).

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Miller Thomson LLP, Wage, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Consideration, Fair market value, Secured creditor, Prejudice, UNCITRAL, Title 11 of the US Code
    Authors:
    Margaret R. Sims , Eric Sherkin
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Miller Thomson LLP
    SCC confirms no crown priority for unremitted GST/QST in a bankruptcy
    2009-12-10

    On October 30, 2009, the Supreme Court of Canada released its long-anticipated decision in Quebec (Revenue) v. Caisse populaire Desjardins de Montmagny. At issue in this case (and two companion cases) was the legal characterization of Crown rights with respect to collected but unremitted GST and Quebec sales tax (QST) in the hands of a trustee in bankruptcy. The Supreme Court confirmed that the Crown is an ordinary unsecured creditor with respect to such amounts, subject to the rights of prior ranking security holders.

    Summary of Facts

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Norton Rose Fulbright, Bankruptcy, Accounts receivable, Excise, Tax deduction, Secured creditor, Goods and services tax (Canada), Unsecured creditor, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Supreme Court of the United States, Supreme Court of Canada, Quebec Court of Appeal
    Authors:
    Barry N. Segal , Virginie Gauthier
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
    Insolvency proceedings in Canada
    2010-01-20

    introduction

    This document provides a brief overview of insolvency proceedings in Canada. It outlines the Canadian legislative framework and briefly describes the receivership process, the bankruptcy regime and the formal restructuring alternatives available to debtors.

    legislative framework

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, McMillan LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Personal property, Liability (financial accounting), Liquidation, Secured creditor, US Federal Government, US Constitution, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McMillan LLP
    Canadian insolvency law amendments: focus for equipment financiers
    2009-10-27

    On September 17, 2009 our firm published a summary of recent amendments (the "Amendments") to Canada’s Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act ("BIA") and Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act ("CCAA"). This summary provided a detailed review of the significant legislative changes that were brought into force on September 18, 2009.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Asset Finance, Insolvency & Restructuring, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, Debtor, Personal property, Common law, Secured creditor, Credit rating agency, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Authors:
    Joseph Bellissimo , Jonathan Fleisher
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
    Focus for equipment financiers
    2009-10-29

    On September 17, 2009 our firm published a summary of recent amendments (the "Amendments") to Canada’s Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act ("BIA") and Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act ("CCAA"). This summary provided a detailed review of the significant legislative changes that were brought into force on September 18, 2009.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, Debtor, Personal property, Common law, Secured creditor, Credit rating agency, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Authors:
    Joseph Bellissimo , Jonathan Fleisher
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP
    Set-off or security interest? Supreme Court’s expansion of enhanced federal deemed trust provisions raises some troubling issues
    2009-10-29

    Caisse Populaire Desjardins de l’Est de Drummond v. Canada, 2009 SCC 29

    Filed under:
    Canada, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McMillan LLP, Income tax, Personal property, Maturity (finance), Unemployment benefits, Line of credit, Secured creditor, Canada Revenue Agency, Income-Tax Act 1961 (India), Supreme Court of Canada, Federal Court (Canada)
    Authors:
    Robert M. Scavone
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McMillan LLP
    Supreme Court of Canada rules that the CRA has no claim on the GST component of a bankrupt’s accounts receivable
    2009-10-30

    The Supreme Court of Canada ruled that bankruptcy trustees, receivers and secured creditors can continue to collect the full amount of accounts receivable of a bankrupt supplier, including the Goods and Services Tax (GST) component, even if an amount remains owing by the supplier to the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA).

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Dentons, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Accounts receivable, Debt, Secured creditor, Goods and services tax (Canada), Goods and Services Tax (New Zealand), Canada Revenue Agency, Supreme Court of Canada
    Authors:
    Roger P. Simard
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Dentons
    Commingling confusion: Brookfield Bridge Lending Fund Inc. v. Karl Oil and Gas Ltd., 2009
    2009-11-19

    The Alberta Court of Appeal recently released its decision with respect to the appeal of Brookfield Bridge Lending Fund Inc. v. Vanquish Oil and Gas Corporation and has rekindled discussion as to the risks associated with an Operator’s right to commingle his own general funds with trust funds held for the benefit of Joint Operators.

    Facts

    Filed under:
    Canada, Alberta, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Miller Thomson LLP, Secured creditor, Constructive trust, Trustee, Court of Appeal of England & Wales, Court of Appeal of Alberta
    Authors:
    Richard L.G. Gushue , David M. Woodside
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Miller Thomson LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 11
    • Page 12
    • Page 13
    • Page 14
    • Current page 15
    • Page 16
    • Page 17
    • Page 18
    • Page 19
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days