Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Fifth Circuit certifies ‘good-faith-for-value’ issue to Texas Supreme Court in Golf Channel case
    2015-07-07

    Is market value sufficient proof of reasonably equivalent value for purposes of the good-faith-for-value defense under Texas law? The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit certified that question to the Texas Supreme Court on June 30, 2015, after vacating its earlier decision in Janvey v. The Golf Channel, Inc., 2015 WL 3972216, at *3 (5th Cir. June 30, 2015).

    Filed under:
    USA, Texas, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Fifth Circuit, Texas Supreme Court
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook , Brian C. Tong
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Divided Tenth Circuit reverses recharacterization and equitable subordination of insider secured loan
    2015-07-09

    The claim of an insider lender (“L”) who invested “in a venture with substantial risk” and who loaned it additional funds on a secured basis to salvage its business should not be recharacterized as equity or subordinated on equitable grounds, held the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit on June 12, 2015. In re Alternate Fuels, Inc., 2015 WL 3635366 (10th Cir. June 12, 2015) (2-1) (“AFI”).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Secured loan, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, Tenth Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Divided Third Circuit approves structured dismissal that provides class-skipping distribution
    2015-06-22

    A settlement providing for dismissal of a Chapter 11 case and distribution of estate property “that deviates from the Bankruptcy Code’s priority” scheme is permissible, held a divided panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on May 21, 2015. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. CIT Group/Business Credit Inc. (In re Jevic Holding Corp.), 2015 WL 2403443, at *1 (3d Cir. May 21, 2015) (2- 1) (“Jevic”).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Fifth Circuit orders mandatory subordination of contractual guaranty claims
    2015-06-05

    A creditor’s guaranty claim “arising from equity investments in a debtor’s affiliate should be treated the same as equity investments in the debtor itself — i.e., … subordinated to the claims of general  creditors,” held the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on April 28, 2015. In re American Housing Foundation, 2015 WL 1918854, at *8 (5th Cir. April 28, 2015).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White Collar Crime, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Debtor, Fifth Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    U.S. Supreme Court preserves bankruptcy court power to hear disputes
    2015-05-28

    Bankruptcy courts may hear state law disputes “when the parties knowingly and voluntarily consent,” held the U.S. Supreme Court on May 26, 2015. Wellness Int’l Network Ltd. v. Sharif, 2015 WL 2456619, at *3 (May 26, 2015). That consent, moreover, need not be express, reasoned the Court. Id. at *9 (“Nothing in the Constitution requires that consent to adjudication by a bankruptcy court be express.”). Reversing the U.S.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook , Lawrence V. Gelber , David M. Hillman
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Delaware’s high court affirms dismissal of creditor’s suit against directors
    2007-05-25

    The Delaware Supreme Court affirmed on May 18, 2007, the Delaware Chancery Court’s dismissal of a breach of fiduciary duty suit brought by a creditor against certain directors of Clearwire Holdings Inc. North American Catholic Educational Programming Foundation, Inc. v. Gheewalla, C.A. No. 1456-N (May 18, 2007).

    Whether a creditor may assert a direct claim against corporate directors for breach of fiduciary duty when the corporation is insolvent or in the so-called “zone of insolvency.”

    Answer: No.

    Filed under:
    USA, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Breach of contract, Fraud, Fiduciary, Board of directors, Limited liability company, Beneficiary, Standing (law), Good faith, Commercial law, Derivative suit, Westlaw, Delaware Court of Chancery, Delaware Supreme Court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Fourth Circuit affirms dismissal of reorganization case due to commercial tenant’s bad faith litigation tactics
    2007-06-20

    The Fourth Circuit, on June 15, 2007, affirmed the dismissal of a Chapter 11 reorganization petition filed by a tenant debtor in a commercial lease dispute. Maryland Port Administration v. Premier Automotive Services, Incorporated (In re Premier Automotive Services, Incorporated), ___ F.3d ___, 2007 WL 1721951 (4th Cir. 6/15/07).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Injunction, Landlord, Leasehold estate, Interest, Federal Reporter, Good faith, Bad faith, Westlaw, Title 11 of the US Code, Administrative law judge, United States bankruptcy court, Fifth Circuit, Fourth Circuit, Sixth Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Court insulates lender's collateral from professional fee surcharge
    2007-07-23

    SRZ's reorganization group recently helped a lender avoid a surcharge against its collateral for legal fees. U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Arthur N. Votolato of the District of Rhode Island handed the lender the important victory on July 5, 2007, after an earlier trial. In re California Webbing Industries, Inc., 2007 WL 1953018 (Bankr. D. R. I., 7/5/07). In a detailed 22-page opinion, Judge Votolato held that the lender never consented to the use of its collateral to pay the fees of counsel for a Chapter 11 debtor and the creditors' committee in its failed reorganization case.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Collateral (finance), Federal Reporter, Secured creditor, US Code, Trustee, Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court, Fifth Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Second Circuit affirms dismissal of creditors' committee equitable subordination complaint
    2007-08-20

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, on July 9, 2007, decisively affirmed a bankruptcy court's dismissal of an equitable subordination complaint filed by a creditors' committee against eight investment fund lenders. Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Applied Theory Corporation v. Halifax Fund, L.P., et al. (In re Applied Theory Corporation), ___ F.3d ___, 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 16180 (2d Cir. July 9, 2007).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Federal Reporter, Standing (law), Limited partnership, Investment funds, Secured creditor, Unsecured creditor, Secured loan, Trustee, Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court, Fourth Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Investment bank's advisory fee properly calculated under reasonableness standard
    2007-08-06

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held on July 26, 2007, that a bankruptcy court properly calculated an investment bank's advisory fee under a reasonableness standard. In re Citation Corp., ___ F.3d ___ 2007 WL 2128165 (July 26, 2007).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Conflict of interest, Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Debtor, Federal Reporter, Investment banking, Contingent fee, Westlaw, United States bankruptcy court, Eleventh Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 23
    • Page 24
    • Page 25
    • Page 26
    • Current page 27
    • Page 28
    • Page 29
    • Page 30
    • Page 31
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days