Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Seventh Circuit changes its mind and reverses “inconsistent” district court fraudulent transfer and equitable subordination ruling
    2013-09-04

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held on Aug. 26, 2013 that an investment manager’s “failure to keep client funds properly segregated” and subsequent pledge of those funds “to secure an overnight loan” to stay in business may have constituted: (a) a fraudulent transfer to the lender; and (b) grounds for equitably subordinating the lender’s $312 million secured claim. In re Sentinel Management Group, Inc., 2013 WL 4505152, *1 (7th Cir. Aug. 26, 2013) (“Sentinel II”).

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Security (finance), Seventh Circuit
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Third Circuit permits reopening of reorganization case to enforce debtor’s purchase option in real estate lease
    2013-08-19

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held on July 30, 2013, that a reorganized Chapter 11 debtor could reopen its closed case, enabling the debtor assignee to enforce a purchase option in a real property lease despite the lease’s “anti-assignment provisions.” In re Lazy Days’ RV Center Inc., 2013 WL 3886735, *5 (3d Cir. July 30, 2013).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Fifth Amendment, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook , Lawrence V. Gelber
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Fifth Circuit protects secured lender who bypasses Chapter 11 reorganization plan
    2013-08-12

    The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit held on August 5 that a secured lender’s disputed “lien on [the debtor’s] principal asset survived . . . confirmation of [the debtor’s] Chapter 11 . . . reorganization plan” because the lender had not participated in the bankruptcy case.S. White Transportation, Inc. v. Acceptance Loan Co., 2013 WL 3983343, *1,*3 (5th Cir. Aug. 5, 2013). Had the lender participated in the case, the court reasoned, its lien might have been avoided.Id., at *1, citingIn re Ahern Enterprises, Inc., 507 F.3d 817, 822 (5th Cir.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Secured creditor, Fifth Circuit
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Case highlight: District Court affirms bankruptcy court order confirming SRZ client Quigley’s Chapter 11 asbestos reorganization plan
    2013-08-02

    Chief Judge Loretta A. Preska of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York affirmed the order confirming SRZ client Quigley Company Inc.’s Chapter 11 reorganization plan on July 30, 2013. As noted in our Alert of June 28, 2013, the plan enables Quigley to emerge from Chapter 11 over the objection of a dissenting creditor class and another group of asbestos personal injury claimants.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Injunction
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    District court rejects trustee’s “clever” assignment of fraudulent transfer claims to avoid code’s safe harbor defense
    2013-07-19

    U.S. District Judge Jed S. Rakoff of the Southern District of New York, applying the swap agreement safe harbor provision of the Bankruptcy Code (the "Code") §546(g), dismissed a Chapter 11 litigation trustee's state law fraudulent transfer complaint against a bank on June 11, 2013. Whyte v. Barclays Bank, PLC, 2013 WL2489925 (S.D.N.Y. June 11, 2013).

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Debtor, Title 11 of the US Code
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Quigley Company Inc. emerges from heavily litigated Chapter 11 asbestos reorganization
    2013-06-28

     

    Cramdown Plan Stays Suits Against Corporate Parent

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Injunction, Pfizer, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook , Lawrence V. Gelber , Robert J. Ward , Kurt F. Rosell , Robert S. Nash
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Safe harbor update: still a good defense to fraudulent transfer and preference claims
    2013-07-08

    Appellate courts continue to agree on the vitality and breadth of the safe harbor defense contained in Bankruptcy Code ("Code") § 546(e) (insulating from the trustee's fraudulent transfer or preference attack "settlement payment" or "margin payment" on a "securities contract," "commodity contract" or "forward contract" except when the debtor's payment is made with "actual intent to hinder, delay, or defraud" creditors). In re Quebecor World (USA) Inc., 2013 WL2460726, *1 (2d Cir.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Debtor, Security (finance), Safe harbor (law), Federal Reporter
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Ninth Circuit allows bankruptcy courts to recharacterize loans as equity, applying state law
    2013-05-10

    The Ninth Circuit held on April 30, 2013 that a bankruptcy court “has the authority to determine whether a transaction creates a debt or an equity interest for purposes of [Bankruptcy Code] § 548, and that a transaction creates a debt if it creates a ‘right to payment’ under state law.” In re Fitness Holdings International, Inc., 2013 WL 1800000, *1 (9th Cir. April 30, 2013). The court agreed with five other circuits, but explicitly followed the reasoning of the Fifth Circuit’s recent In re Lothian Oil, Inc. decision. 650 F.3d 539, 543-44 (5th Cir.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Shareholder, Debtor, Ninth Circuit, United States bankruptcy court, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Delaware bankruptcy court upholds make-whole claim equal to 37 percent of loan principal
    2013-04-26

    A lender’s right to recover a make-whole premium as part of its allowed claim in a bankruptcy case has been the subject of several recent court decisions. A Delaware bankruptcy court recently allowed a make-whole premium of $23.7 million on a $67 million term loan[1] and found that the premium was not “plainly disproportionate” to the creditor’s possible loss. As a result, the make-whole was not an unenforceable penalty under New York law. In re School Specialty, Inc., No. 13-10125, Slip Op. (Bankr. D. Del. Apr. 22, 2013).[2]

    Facts

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Interest, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    David M. Hillman
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    District Court dismisses insider preference claim despite affiliates holding equity and board seats
    2013-04-19

    The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed an insider preference complaint by Capmark Financial Group Inc. and its affiliates ("Capmark") seeking to recover a $145 million pre-bankruptcy payment from a lender group. Capmark Financial Group Inc. v. Goldman Sachs Credit Partners L.P., __ F. Supp. 2d __, 2013 WL 1420243 (S.D.N.Y. Apr.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Bankruptcy, Board of directors, Limited liability company, Ally Financial, Second Circuit, US District Court for the Southern District of New York
    Authors:
    David M. Hillman , Eleazer Klein , Howard O. Godnick , Michael L. Cook , Meghan M. Breen
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 16
    • Page 17
    • Page 18
    • Page 19
    • Current page 20
    • Page 21
    • Page 22
    • Page 23
    • Page 24
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days