Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    LBIE administrators extend September 17, 2010 proof of debt submission deadline for Consensual Approach participants
    2010-09-17

    Previously, on June 16, 2010, the Joint Administrators (the “Administrators”) of Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (“LBIE”) announced that they would be testing the feasibility of their so-called Consensual Approach to the resolution of LBIE’s unsecured creditor claims. They anticipated the Consensual Approach would be applicable to financial trading creditors ("FTCs") and conceptually outlined the Consensual Approach as follows:

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Unsecured debt, Dividends, Data, Option (finance), Debt, Precondition, Unsecured creditor, Federal Trade Commission (USA), Lehman Brothers
    Authors:
    Lawrence V. Gelber
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    The Third Circuit overrules a long-standing case, changing the ability of personal injury plaintiffs to bring suit against debtors
    2010-09-13

    JELD-WEN, Inc v Van Brunt (In re Grossman’s Inc), (3d Cir No 09-1563, June 2, 2010)

    CASE SNAPSHOT

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Product Regulation & Liability, Reed Smith LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Statutory interpretation, Due process, Liquidation, Precondition, Bankruptcy discharge, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    Jennifer P. Knox
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    Escrow arrearages are pre-bankruptcy petition claims
    2011-01-03

    On December 23rd, the Third Circuit addressed whether the automatic stay provisions of the Bankruptcy Code prevents a home mortgage lender from accounting for the pre-petition escrow shortage in its post-petition calculation of future monthly escrow payments. The Court concluded that when the terms of the loan allow the lender to escrow taxes and insurance payments, the lender has a pre-petition claim. In re Francisco Rodriguez.  

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Winston & Strawn LLP, Accounting, Mortgage loan, Precondition, Third Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Winston & Strawn LLP
    Granite Re entitled to pre- and post-judgment interest in bankruptcy action
    2011-03-10

    Following a $9 million judgment in its favor, Granite Re was further awarded pre- and post-judgment interest on that judgment. Granite Re filed a proof of claim in Acceptance Insurance’s bankruptcy action for the amount of $10.9 million, the balance of the premium due under a reinsurance contract plus interest. Acceptance disputed the claim, arguing it no longer needed reinsurance, and filed a separate adversary proceeding against Granite Re alleging unjust enrichment. The Eighth Circuit’s Bankruptcy Appellate Panel reversed the bankruptcy court’s ruling in favor of Acceptance.

    Filed under:
    USA, Nebraska, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Jorden Burt LLP, Bankruptcy, Interest, Reinsurance, Unjust enrichment, Precondition, Unilateralism, Eighth Circuit, United States bankruptcy court, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
    Authors:
    John Black
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jorden Burt LLP
    Assigned bankruptcy claims included right to collect cure amount
    2011-03-21

    REGEN CAPITAL I, INC. v. UAL CORP. (February 18, 2011)

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Precondition, Default (finance), United Airlines, AT&T, Indian National Congress, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
    TUPE and administrations: Oakland v Wellswood rejected
    2011-03-31

    Administrations, including "pre-packs", are not capable of constituting "insolvency proceedings...instituted with a view to the liquidation of the assets of the transferor" within the meaning of Regulation 8(7) of TUPE. Where there is a sale of an undertaking by an administrator, the employees assigned to the undertaking will automatically transfer to the buyer and receive unfair dismissal protection.

    Key facts

    Filed under:
    USA, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Contractual term, Liability (financial accounting), Liquidation, Unfair dismissal, Precondition, Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (UK), Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Buyers in pre pack are responsible for liabilities arising post TUPE transfer
    2011-06-30

    The Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) has held inPressure Coolers Ltd v Molley UKEAT/0272/10 that when a transferor under TUPE is subject to insolvency proceedings not instituted with a view to liquidating the transferor's assets, the Secretary of State will only meet employment liabilities that arise before the transfer.

    Filed under:
    USA, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Faegre Baker Daniels LLP, Discrimination, Liability (financial accounting), Liquidation, Unfair dismissal, Precondition, Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 (UK), Employment Appeal Tribunal
    Authors:
    Anna Byford , Alex Denny , Victoria Pengelly
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Faegre Baker Daniels LLP
    Franchises filing bankruptcy: the Los Angeles Dodgers
    2011-07-05

    Unless you’re not a sports fan or simply don’t follow Major League Baseball (MLB), you probably know that the Los Angeles Dodgers filed a chapter 11 bankruptcy petition on Monday, June 27, 2011. (Delaware Bankruptcy Court, Case Number 11-12010.) According to Forbes magazine, the Dodgers are one of the most valuable baseball franchises in America. Nevertheless, the franchise hit hard times and filed for bankruptcy.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Franchising, Insolvency & Restructuring, Media & Entertainment, Roetzel & Andress, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Precondition, Forbes, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Michael J. Carey
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Roetzel & Andress
    Court of Appeal confirms financial support directionsissued in insolvency have super priority
    2011-10-17

    The Court of Appeal has confirmed that the costs of complying with Financial Support Directions (“FSDs”) proposed to be issued to certain Nortel and Lehman companies by the Pensions Regulator (“TPR”) qualify as “super priority” administration expenses, payable in priority to unsecured creditors, floating charge holders and the administrators’ own fees.

    The question

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Mayer Brown, Unsecured debt, Debt, Liquidation, Precondition, Defined benefit pension plan, Sponsor (commercial), The Pensions Regulator (UK), Trustee, Court of Appeal of England & Wales
    Authors:
    Devi Shah , Martin Scott
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Mayer Brown
    First opinions: bankruptcy courts’ recent rulings on Twenty Day Claims
    2007-04-01

    As part of the 2005 revisions of the Bankruptcy Code, Congress greatly enhanced the priority of claims asserted by suppliers of goods to debtors in the 20-day period immediately prior to a debtor’s bankruptcy filing by enacting new section 503(b)(9). This new provision raises several interesting issues, some of which were addressed by two recent cases examining the question of when such claims are to be paid.

    The Language of Section 503(b)(9)

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Jones Day, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Precondition, US Congress, Uniform Commercial Code (USA), United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • Page 1
    • Page 2
    • Page 3
    • Current page 4
    • Page 5
    • Page 6
    • Page 7
    • Page 8
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days