Bankruptcy & Corporate Restructuring Bulletin

On January 30, 2017, Louisiana Medical Center and Heart Hospital, LLC, a 132-bed acute-care hospital located in the heart of St. Tammany Parish in Lacombe, Louisiana, filed for bankruptcy. As reported in papers filed with the bankruptcy court, Louisiana Medical failed in its effort to sell its hospital as a going concern prior to commencing its bankruptcy case and is now swiftly winding down its operations due to continuing losses.

I don't usually post about bankruptcy or criminal law issues, but the facts from a recent decision from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, which involved both bankruptcy and criminal law issues, were too intriguing to ignore.

Earlier this month, in Rea v. Federated Investors, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 25501 (Dec. 15, 2010), the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that while federal law prohibits a private employer from firing or discriminating against an employee who files or has filed for bankruptcy, it does not prohibit a private employer from denying employment to someone simply because he had filed for bankruptcy in the past. Thus, 11 U.S.C. § 525(b) does not create a cause of action against private employers who engage in discriminatory hiring.

The plaintiff, Horng Technical Enterprise Co., LTD (“Horng”), was a Taiwanese corporation that manufactured computer accessories.  Horng Technical Enterprise Co., LTD v. Sakar International, Inc., No. 10-3648 (3d Cir. June 23, 2011).  The defendant, Sakar International, Inc.

What recourse is there for a plaintiff seeking to recover a debt when the defendant goes bankrupt during suit, and its owner commences operating essentially the same business through another legal entity?  Can successor liability be asserted and, if so, how?  Those issues played out in the recent case of Marange Printing, Inc. v. Finish Line NJ, Inc., et  al., Superior Court of New Jersey, Docket No. A-2735-12T2 (decided March 7, 2014).

On September 24, 2013, in Farmers Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. NJPLIGA,      N.J. , 2013 WL5311272 (2013), the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled that policy limits of solvent insurers must be exhausted before the New Jersey Property‐ Liability Insurance Guaranty Association ("NJPLIGA") could be responsible  for long‐tail claims under policies issued by insolvent insurers. NJPLIGA is a statutory entity created to provide New Jersey policyholders with protection when insurers become insolvent.

Irving Picard, the trustee appointed under the Securities Investor Protection Act (the “Trustee”), 15 U.S.C. § 78aaa et seq. (“SIPA”), to administer the estate of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, LLC, has brought hundreds of actions seeking to avoid transfers that were purportedly fraudulent or preferential (the “Avoidance Actions”). Some of the Avoidance Action defendants sought to withdraw the reference to the Bankruptcy Court, basing their motions on the Supreme Court’s decision in Stern v. Marshall, 131 S. Ct. 2594 (2011).

In many Chapter 11 business bank - ruptcies, the office of the U.S. Trustee (the “UST”) will appoint a representative body of unsecured creditors (the “Com mittee”) to represent the interests of all unsecured creditors. The Committee is selected from unsecured creditors of the debtor who generally hold the largest unsecured claims against the debtor, are not “insiders” of the debtor and are willing to serve. A potential Committee member’s willingness to serve is demon strated through returning the creditor questionnaire to the UST and/or attending the formation meeting when scheduled.

In the aftermath of the economic recession, US cities, towns and other municipalities facing the threat of budgetary and financial catastrophe are turning to Chapter 9 of the US Bankruptcy Code for protection.