Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    KiwiSaver balances off limits in a bankruptcy – Court of Appeal
    2015-04-21

    A bankrupt’s KiwiSaver account balance is off limits to the Official Assignee.  Even if it were not, the Official Assignee could not use the bankruptcy to invoke the hardship-based early withdrawal provisions in the KiwiSaver Act 2006.

    This is the effect of a Court of Appeal judgment, delivered on Friday.  Although justifiable in policy terms, the decision raises issues about the appropriate balance between promoting retirement savings and protecting creditor rights. 

    Significance

    Filed under:
    New Zealand, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Chapman Tripp, Bankruptcy
    Authors:
    Mike Woodbury , Michael Arthur , Penny Sheerin , Tim Williams , Emma Dale (Harding)
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Firm:
    Chapman Tripp
    Voidable transactions – Court of Appeal rules out peak indebtedness but important questions remain
    2015-04-28

    “The peak indebtedness rule is not part of the law in New Zealand”, according to the Court of Appeal, in a decision dismissing two appeals on an issue “significant for both liquidators and creditors generally”.

    Filed under:
    New Zealand, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Chapman Tripp, Debt
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Firm:
    Chapman Tripp
    Commercial eSpeaking- Winter 2015
    2015-06-05

    Terms of Trade

    Ensure your Terms are robust

    Filed under:
    New Zealand, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Real Estate, James & Wells
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Firm:
    James & Wells
    Receivers may be liable for body corporate levies – Appeal Court
    2015-06-22

    The Court of Appeal has found that receivers can be personally liable for body corporate levies accrued during a receivership.

    The judgment is based on a broader interpretation of the relevant provisions in the Receiverships Act 1993 than applied by the High Court in Body Corporate 162791 v Gilbert, and reverses that decision.1    

    Filed under:
    New Zealand, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Chapman Tripp, Legal personality
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Firm:
    Chapman Tripp
    Can a bankrupt's pension pot be used to pay creditors? The search for clarity in New Zealand and the UK
    2015-07-01

    How does the objective of achieving payment for creditors in insolvency interact with the objectives of pension legislation, which seeks to ensure that individuals are adequately provided for in retirement? The courts in New Zealand and in the UK have each recently grappled with this issue. In both of the recent cases considered in this article the pensions objectives won out and the specific pension funds in question were not made available for the bankrupt individual's creditors.

    Filed under:
    New Zealand, United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, DLA Piper
    Location:
    New Zealand, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    DLA Piper
    Update on 'big five' insolvency issues
    2015-07-03

    Over the last couple of years, we have developed the habit of periodically pushing up the periscope to try to determine the ‘big five’ insolvency issues on the horizon. 

    Below is a retrospective assessment of how we did last time and our best guess as to what will dominate the next 12 months.

    The big five for 2015

    Filed under:
    New Zealand, Insolvency & Restructuring, Chapman Tripp
    Authors:
    James McMillan
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Firm:
    Chapman Tripp
    Statements to liquidator under oath have immunity – High Court
    2015-09-22

    If asked to provide information to a liquidator, the safest course may be to provide it under oath under section 261 of the Companies Act 1993 because the High Court has found that immunity will apply to such statements.

    We look at the decision.

    The case

    Filed under:
    New Zealand, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Chapman Tripp
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Firm:
    Chapman Tripp
    Receivers not personally liable for Body Corporate levies
    2014-04-28

    In Body Corporate 162791 v Gilbert [2014] NZHC 567, the High Court found that receivers are not personally liable under s 32(5) of the Receiverships Act 1993 (the Act) for body corporate levies under the Unit Titles Act 2010.

    The facts

    Filed under:
    New Zealand, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Bell Gully, Legal personality
    Authors:
    Murray Tingey
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Firm:
    Bell Gully
    The New Giant - plotting the course between Admiralty and cross border insolvency rules
    2014-05-02

    Admiralty proceedings against a vessel are necessarily territorial in nature. A debtor’s vessel may sail into a certain jurisdiction and be arrested and sold for the benefit of creditors who both have Admiralty in rem claims against the vessel and actively take the required steps in the Court proceeding concerned.  Creditors not having rights of claim of that nature would miss out or only have a very low priority in respect of the proceeds of sale.

    Filed under:
    New Zealand, South Korea, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Shipping & Transport, Hesketh Henry, Debtor, In rem jurisdiction
    Authors:
    Alan Sherlock , Sarah Holderness
    Location:
    New Zealand, South Korea
    Firm:
    Hesketh Henry
    More than one way to recover insolvent transactions – but liquidators take care
    2014-05-02

    Liquidators are not limited to the procedure set out in section 295 of the Companies Act to recover a debt once an insolvent transaction has been set aside. 

    Filed under:
    New Zealand, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Chapman Tripp, Debt, Liquidator (law)
    Authors:
    Michael Arthur , Michael Harper , Daniel Kalderimis , Hamish Foote , James McMillan , James Burt
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Firm:
    Chapman Tripp

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 12
    • Page 13
    • Page 14
    • Page 15
    • Current page 16
    • Page 17
    • Page 18
    • Page 19
    • Page 20
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days