The court had made orders for examination of 4 current and former directors of New Image by the liquidators of Omegatrend.

In Katavich v Meltzer & Ors, the court confirmed that pursuant to ss 284 and 321 of the Companies Act 1993 (Act), liquidators can be removed notwithstanding that their final report has been filed and the company is to be struck off the Register.

In Nylex (New Zealand) Ltd (In Rec and in Liq) v Independent Timber Merchants Co-Operative Limited Justice Heath granted summary judgment to Nylex and rejected ITM's argument that it had a defence of equitable set-off relating to unpaid loyalty scheme obligations.

A recent decision confirms that liquidators can require creditors and other persons with relevant knowledge about the affairs of the company in liquidation to provide information.

Between 2006 and 2010, 50 New Zealand finance companies either went into liquidation or receivership, or froze payments. The Securities Commission has now released information about its investigations into these finance companies.

The information released highlights the Commission's work to date, the companies being investigated, the status of the investigations and the behaviour or act that triggered the Commission's involvement. It also answers some common questions about the Commission's work in connection with the failures, including:

In Stiassny v Commissioner of Inland Revenue the court considered whether the receivers of 2 companies trading together in partnership were personally liable for GST on the sale of partnership assets, and whether a claim could be made against the Commissioner of Inland Revenue for money had and received.

ACC had contracted OPC to provide services. OPC's directors later established the OPC Trust, with OPC as the trustee, and 3 residuary trusts as beneficiaries.

[2007] NZCA 122

Decision of The Court Of Appeal of New Zealand on Sham and Alter Ego Trusts

Facts and Decision  

Case law on the new insolvent transactions regime is scarce, even though the changes were introduced three years ago. The High Court's recent decision in Blanchett v McEntee Hire Holdings Limited examines, for the first time in New Zealand, central principles in the new voidable transactions regime.

INTRODUCTION

The use of trusts for asset protection purposes is well established and – in principle – not improper. However, recent history has seen increasing attempts by creditors to have transfers of assets unwound. A recent UK Supreme Court case saw the Court effectively achieve this by way of a resulting trust finding.1 This article considers the issue from a different angle: insolvency legislation.