Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Order in the land of indefeasible mortgages has been restored
    2012-04-26

    In a decision released in September 2011, the High Court ruled that a mortgagee cannot exercise its power of sale under the mortgage if the Family Court has subsequently made an interim occupation order under the Property (Relationships) Act. That ruling had significant consequences for mortgagees, and was appealed to the Court of Appeal.

    Filed under:
    New Zealand, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Bell Gully
    Authors:
    Murray Tingey , David McPherson
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Firm:
    Bell Gully
    Court confirms its broad power in voluntary administrations
    2012-05-24

    The High Court has confirmed its broad power to bypass the strict legislative requirements that otherwise govern voluntary administrations.  Section 239ADO(1) of the Companies Act allows the Court to make any order that it thinks appropriate about how the voluntary administration provisions of the Companies Act are to operate in relation to a particular company.

    Filed under:
    New Zealand, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Chapman Tripp
    Authors:
    Michael Arthur , Michael Harper
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Firm:
    Chapman Tripp
    Recent GST cases address commissioner's priority to GST in insolvency and criteria for deregistration
    2012-05-31

    “...we consider that the section means what it says, and that there is not much point in trying to paraphrase it.” (Supreme Court in Thompson v CIR)

    Filed under:
    New Zealand, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Russell McVeagh, Statutory interpretation, Goods and services tax (Canada)
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Firm:
    Russell McVeagh
    Doing business in New Zealand
    2012-06-01

    This guide introduces you to New Zealand's business and trading environment, with particular focus on legal and regulatory matters.

    Filed under:
    New Zealand, Banking, Capital Markets, Company & Commercial, Competition & Antitrust, Copyrights, Corporate Finance/M&A, Employment & Labor, Energy & Natural Resources, Environment & Climate Change, Immigration, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Legal Practice, Patents, Public, Real Estate, Tax, Trade & Customs, Trademarks, Simpson Grierson
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Firm:
    Simpson Grierson
    Are trading trusts getting an easy ride, Law Commission asks
    2012-02-21

    The Law Commission is looking into whether the regulation of trading trusts gives enough protection to creditors and beneficiaries in circumstances of insolvency. 

    Submissions are due on the issues paper by 2 March 2012.

    What is a trading trust?

    Filed under:
    New Zealand, Insolvency & Restructuring, Private Client & Offshore Services, Chapman Tripp, Beneficiary
    Authors:
    Michael Arthur , Geoff Carter , Matthew Yarnell , Michael Harper
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Firm:
    Chapman Tripp
    Two bills that affect insolvency practitioners on ice for election
    2011-11-28

    The Insolvency Practitioners Bill is now unlikely to come into force until early 2013 due to the disruption caused by the election.  The Finance and Expenditure Select Committee’s report on the Taxation (Annual Rates, Returns Filing, and Remedial Matters) Bill will also be delayed until next year.

    Insolvency Practitioners Bill

    Filed under:
    New Zealand, Insolvency & Restructuring, Chapman Tripp
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Firm:
    Chapman Tripp
    Partnership dissolution: when do partners' obligations end?
    2011-11-30

    A recent Court of Appeal decision (Clark v Libra Developments Ltd [2011] NZCA 493), provides a useful guide to the general principles which apply to partners who do not have a formal agreement in place governing the dissolution of their partnership.

    Filed under:
    New Zealand, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Bell Gully
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Firm:
    Bell Gully
    Court of Appeal on receivers' limitation of personal liability
    2011-12-06

    Receivers cannot escape personal liability on contracts they cause the company to enter into simply because all of the company’s assets have been paid out.

    So the Court of Appeal found last week in a decision which explored the application of limitation of liability clauses where, as is common practice, the liability is limited to the “available assets” of the company.

    Filed under:
    New Zealand, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Chapman Tripp
    Authors:
    Michael Arthur , Michael Harper , James McMillan , Hamish Foote , Bruce Scott
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Firm:
    Chapman Tripp
    Supreme Court confirms limited scope of VA casting votes
    2011-12-08

    The Supreme Court has affirmed the Court of Appeal’s finding in August of this year that a voluntary administrator may only use a casting vote at a watershed meeting where the number of creditors voting for and against a proposed deed of company arrangement (DOCA) is equal.

    Filed under:
    New Zealand, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Chapman Tripp, Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    Michael Arthur , Michael Harper , Matthew Yarnell , Hamish Foote
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Firm:
    Chapman Tripp
    Bankruptcy notice not defective
    2011-12-19

    In Stockco Ltd v Denize the applicants sought an order to set aside bankruptcy notices on the ground that the creditor had not complied with High Court Rule 24.8(3).  That Rule requires that a certified copy of the judgment or order on which the bankruptcy notice is based must be attached to the bankruptcy notice.  The applicants claimed that the notice was defective as it was served separately from copies of the judgment.

    Filed under:
    New Zealand, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Buddle Findlay, Bankruptcy
    Location:
    New Zealand
    Firm:
    Buddle Findlay

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 22
    • Page 23
    • Page 24
    • Page 25
    • Current page 26
    • Page 27
    • Page 28
    • Page 29
    • Page 30
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days