Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Subordination agreements work: if you assign your plan vote – mean it
    2013-07-03

    Given the commonality in today’s marketplace of complex corporate capital structures that employ multiple layers of secured debt, existing and potential creditors need to be increasingly aware of the rights and limitations provided for in subordination or intercreditor agreements. These agreements are often entered into between the existing lender or debt holder and a new lender. They often restrict the actions of subordinated lenders upon the debtor’s filing for bankruptcy protection, including denying their right to vote on the debtor’s plan of reorganization.

    Filed under:
    USA, New Jersey, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Lowenstein Sandler LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Secured loan
    Authors:
    Sharon L. Levine , Wojciech F. Jung , Philip J. Gross
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Lowenstein Sandler LLP
    In re Big M, Inc.
    2013-05-02

    In re Big M, Inc., No. 13-10233 (DHS), 2013 WL 1681489 (Bankr. D.N.J. April 17, 2013). In Big M, the Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey (the “Bankruptcy Court”) held that the debtor’s privilege did not pass to the creditors’ committee, even though the creditors’ committee obtained authority to investigate certain of the debtor’s causes of action, because the committee was acting as a fiduciary to creditors as opposed to the debtor’s estate.

    Filed under:
    USA, New Jersey, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Alston & Bird LLP, Debtor, Fiduciary
    Authors:
    Heather Byrd Asher
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Alston & Bird LLP
    Superstorm Hurricane Sandy's impact upon business & retailers - bankruptcy and alternatives
    2013-03-05

    In the wake of Hurricane Sandy many businesses have been negatively impacted financially throughout regions from Connecticut, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania and Delaware.  Hardest hit are businesses located not only along the New Jersey, Staten Island and  Long Island  NY  coasts but in areas  that  have never experienced such a devastating disaster.  Areas  such as  Hoboken NJ,lower Manhattan and the NYC  East Side.  Even  businesses  located in inland  communit

    Filed under:
    USA, Connecticut, Delaware, New Jersey, New York, Pennsylvania, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Duane Morris LLP, Retail
    Authors:
    Walter J. Greenhalgh
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Duane Morris LLP
    Exempt property sales in bankruptcy
    2013-01-14

    I just had an interesting discussion with a partner on the subject of the sale of exempt property in bankruptcy.  We concluded that even though tenant by the entireties real estate might be exempt from creditor claims in some states, nonetheless in bankruptcy it is still property of the estate under Bankruptcy Code section 541 and subject to the bankruptcy trustee’s general powers of sale under Code section 363(b).  The analysis goes like this:  section 541 creates a bankruptcy estate that includes all interests of the debtor in property without mention of exemptions, and sec

    Filed under:
    USA, New Jersey, Insolvency & Restructuring, Real Estate, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Leasehold estate
    Authors:
    Michael J. Viscount, Jr.
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    When environmental law confronts bankruptcy law
    2012-11-26

    The intricacies of pursuing environmental claims against financially distressed parties

    In a prolonged financial downturn, it is an even more difficult burden for many companies to shoulder their own environmental remediation requirements.Pollock’s article examines the steps to consider if a co-liable potentially responsible party (PRP) is either showing signs of economic distress or has already filed in bankruptcy.  

    Filed under:
    USA, New Jersey, Environment & Climate Change, Insolvency & Restructuring, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, US Department of Justice
    Authors:
    Jeffrey M. Pollock
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    New Jersey court rules receiver can be liable for personal injury
    2012-11-08

    The New Jersey Appellate Court has recently ruled that a receiver can be sued for injuries sustained in a building under the receiver’s control.  The case involved a dilapidated apartment building in Passaic and injuries sustained thirteen months after the receiver was appointed by judge overseeing the foreclosure case of the first mortgage holder.  The receiver was charged with responsibility to collect rent; manage, insure and repair the premises; pay taxes and assessments; and “do all things necessary for the due care and proper management of the mortgaged premises.”  Acco

    Filed under:
    USA, New Jersey, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Fox Rothschild LLP, Mortgage loan, Foreclosure
    Authors:
    Michael J. Viscount, Jr.
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Another court chimes in on validity of intercreditor assignment of voting rights
    2012-10-15

    In re Coastal Broadcasting Systems, Inc., Case No. 11-10596 (Bankr. D. N.J. July 6, 2012)

    CASE SNAPSHOT

    At confirmation, the bankruptcy court considered whether the assignment of voting rights in an intercreditor agreement was enforceable. The bankruptcy court noted that various courts had reached differing conclusions, but ultimately found that the voting assignment in the intercreditor agreement before it was enforceable.

    FACTUAL BACKGROUND

    Filed under:
    USA, New Jersey, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Bankruptcy, Shareholder
    Authors:
    Elizabeth A. McGovern
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    When termination is not termination: NY and NJ bankruptcy courts’ views on leases
    2012-07-02

    Given the spate of bankruptcies filed over the last few years, including by large-scale tenants such as Borders, Linens 'n Things, and Circuit City, and the tenuous financial condition of big-box retailers such as Best Buy, it is important for both landlords and tenants to understand the benefits and limitations of bankruptcy protection as it relates to the status of a bankrupt tenant’s leasehold interest.

    Filed under:
    USA, New Jersey, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Lowenstein Sandler LLP, Bankruptcy, Landlord, Leasehold estate, Best Buy, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Lowenstein Sandler LLP
    Bankruptcy Court determines that property transfer by corporation in which debtor holds a 50% interest does not constitute a transfer of assets of the bankruptcy estate
    2012-06-01

    The United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey recently found that a debtor’s transfer of property owned by a corporation in which the debtor allegedly held a 50% interest did not automatically constitute a transfer of assets of the debtor’s bankruptcy estate. After the debtor filed a voluntary Chapter 7 bankruptcy petition, the Chapter 7 trustee filed an adversary complaint alleging that the debtor purposefully had executed a post-petition mortgage lien on certain real property owned by a corporation of which the debtor was a 50% owner.

    Filed under:
    USA, New Jersey, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Interest, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Subcontractors take note - Appellate Division confirms that construction lender has no duty to subcontractor absent express promise to pay
    2012-03-21

    The New Jersey Appellate Division recently ruled in Vollers Excavating and Construction, Inc. v. Citizens Bank of Pennsylvania, Docket No.

    Filed under:
    USA, New Jersey, Banking, Construction, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cole Schotz PC, Bankruptcy, General contractor, Subcontractor
    Authors:
    Peter James Herrigel
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Cole Schotz PC

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 2
    • Page 3
    • Page 4
    • Page 5
    • Current page 6
    • Page 7
    • Page 8
    • Page 9
    • Page 10
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days