Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Auditors’ liability in fraud cases: House of Lords rules in Moore Stephens v. Stone & Rolls Limited
    2010-06-03

    In a decision handed down just before the end of term, auditors have won an important House of Lords ruling limiting their liability in cases where a “one man” company is used as a vehicle for fraud. The Law Lords dismissed by a majority of three to two a negligence claim brought against an audit firm for failing to detect a massive fraud at Stone & Rolls, a trading company that fell in the late 1990s – holding that the liquidators could not bring a claim for damages when the company itself was responsible for the fraud.

    Background

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Bankruptcy, Letter of credit, Fraud, Audit, Negligence, Liquidator (law), Commodity market, House of Lords, Court of Appeal of England & Wales, High Court of Justice
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
    Auditor liability
    2010-10-04

    On September 30th, the Sixth Circuit affirmed the dismissal of the bankruptcy trustee's lawsuit against Deloitte & Touche, the debtor's former auditor. The trustee alleged that Deloitte negligently failed to uncover and report unsound related-party transactions by the debtor's sole shareholder and CEO, and aided and abetted the CEO's breach of his fiduciary duty to the debtor. Affirming dismissal, the Court held the trustee failed to allege reliance upon Deloitte's audits and the statute of limitations bars the aiding and abetting claim.

    Filed under:
    USA, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Winston & Strawn LLP, Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Debtor, Breach of contract, Fiduciary, Statute of limitations, Limited liability partnership, Negligence, Sixth Circuit, Chief executive officer, Trustee
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Winston & Strawn LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 4
    • Page 5
    • Page 6
    • Page 7
    • Page 8
    • Page 9
    • Page 10
    • Page 11
    • Current page 12
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days