Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    "Wages” under the Wage Earner Protection Program Act (“WEPPA”)
    2011-02-02

    Century Services Inc. v. Canada (Attorney General), [2010] S.C.C.A. No. 259, on appeal from (2009) 319 D.L.R. (4th) 735 (BCCA)

    The union on behalf of the unionized employees of Ted Leroy Trucking Ltd., the bankrupt employer, had applied to the B.C.S.C. for directions and obtained a decision of that Court that the “wages” protected under the WEPPA “superpriority” for unpaid employees included amounts paid by the employer to third parties on behalf of the employees.

    Filed under:
    Canada, British Columbia, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Miller Thomson LLP, Wage, Bankruptcy, Trade union, Involuntary dismissal, Secured creditor, Supreme Court of Canada
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Miller Thomson LLP
    Ontario court confirms receiver’s limited liability to landlord for occupation
    2010-10-18

    Where a tenant becomes insolvent, landlords are often faced with a courtappointed Receiver inserted in place of the insolvent debtor who wishes to operate the tenant’s business or conduct a sale of assets on site. While the landlord may be able to successfully negotiate payment of occupation rent, a common issue that arises iswho is responsible for any damages to the leased premises? A recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in General Motors Corporation v.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Miller Thomson LLP, Debtor, Landlord, Leasehold estate, Personal property, Liquidation, Court of Appeal for Ontario
    Authors:
    Craig A. Mills , Margaret R. Sims
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Miller Thomson LLP
    Court decisions clarify rights of non-profit directors to pay legal fees during receivership
    2010-10-29

    The December 2009 decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal in Peterborough (City) v. Kawartha Native Housing Society Inc. is significant in clarifying the right of the boards of directors of non-profit corporations in receivership to retain legal counsel and pay legal fees out of the corporation’s funds. The case arose out of the contested receivership of two non-profit First Nations social housing corporations.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Miller Thomson LLP, Board of directors, Attorney's fee, Court of Appeal of England & Wales, Court of Appeal for Ontario, Ontario Superior Court of Justice
    Authors:
    Amyn F. Lalji
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Miller Thomson LLP
    Error in debtor’s name in PPSA registration
    2010-08-27

    Fairbanx Corp v Royal Bank of Canada, 2010 ONCA 385 (Ont CA), on appeal from 2009 CanLII 55376 (Ont SC)

    Fairbanx factored accounts for the debtor, Friction Tecnology Consultants Inc. Fairbanx made its Ontario PPSA registration misspelling the name as Technology, with an “H”. Two years later, the debtor obtained a line of credit from the Bank, which correctly named the debtor in its Ontario PPSA registration.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Miller Thomson LLP, Bankruptcy, Credit (finance), Debtor, Consumer protection, Accounts receivable, Conveyancing, Line of credit, Royal Bank of Canada
    Authors:
    Jennifer Babe
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Miller Thomson LLP
    Fishing licence did not revest in discharged bankrupt
    2010-08-27

    Caines, Re, 2010 NLTD 72

    The bankrupt was the holder of a commercial fishing licence. He was discharged from his bankruptcy before the Supreme Court of Canada released its decision inRoyal Bank of Canada v. Saulnier (2008), 298 D.L.R. (4th) 193, in which that Court concluded that a fishing licence was “property” for purposes of the PPSA and BIA.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Miller Thomson LLP, Bankruptcy, Royal Bank of Canada, Trustee, Supreme Court of Canada
    Authors:
    Jennifer Babe
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Miller Thomson LLP
    Storage charges self assessed by secured party
    2010-08-27

    Able Automotive Ltd v Cameron-Okolita Inc, 2010 SKQB 34

    Able brought a motion to appeal the bankruptcy Registrar’s decision that Able was a secured creditor for a certain amount, but disallowing its claim for certain costs, including insurance, a new engine for the vehicle, and storage charges, legal fees and costs.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Saskatchewan, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Miller Thomson LLP, Bankruptcy, Costs in English law, Collateral (finance), Secured creditor, Attorney's fee
    Authors:
    Jennifer Babe
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Miller Thomson LLP
    Mind the gap: direction given for defaulting debtors in a BIA proposal
    2010-09-08

    formal proposal under the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (BIA) is a powerful alternative to bankruptcy. The benefits of a proposal for the debtor are clear: the debtor reduces its debt load and avoids bankruptcy. However, proposals are also beneficial to creditors since generally the creditor’s recovery in a proposal scenario is better than the potential recovery from a liquidation through a bankruptcy. In simple terms, upon the successful completion of a proposal, the debtor gets a “fresh start” and creditors recover more than they would in a bankruptcy.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Miller Thomson LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Debt, Legal burden of proof, Liquidation, Default (law), Default (finance), Bankruptcy discharge, Constitutional amendment, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Trustee
    Authors:
    Craig A. Mills , Margaret R. Sims
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Miller Thomson LLP
    Sally Creek: a cautionary tale for trustees in bankruptcy
    2010-08-16

    The recent Ontario Court of Appeal decision in Murphy v Sally Creek Environs Corporation, 2010 ONCA 312 (“Sally Creek”) is a cautionary tale for Trustees in bankruptcy (“Trustees”) and the counsel who represent them.1 In that case, the Trustee’s fees and those of its legal counsel were drastically reduced on a taxation, a cost award was made against the Trustee personally and the Trustee’s conduct was impugned in a detailed decision of the Bankruptcy Registrar and the Court of Appeal.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Miller Thomson LLP, Bankruptcy, Costs in English law, Solicitor, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Trustee, Court of Appeal for Ontario
    Authors:
    Craig A. Mills , Margaret R. Sims
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Miller Thomson LLP
    We still don’t know what is a fixture vs a chattel
    2010-08-27

    CMIC Mortgage Investment Corp v Rodriguez, 2010 BCSC 308; [2010] BCJ No 425

    The bankrupt farmer ran an equestrian operation. She acquired two fabric covered barns, with one anchored by solid concrete blocks resting on the ground, and the second anchored into concrete foundations.

    Filed under:
    Canada, British Columbia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Miller Thomson LLP, Bankruptcy, Personal property, Royal Bank of Canada
    Authors:
    Jennifer Babe
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Miller Thomson LLP
    Alberta exempts registered savings plans from seizure
    2010-05-14

    One more province has joined the ranks of extending creditor protection to registered savings plans. Alberta’s Civil Enforcement Amendment Act came into force on October 1, 2009 (the “Act”). It applies to registered retirement savings plans (RRSPs), registered retirement income funds (RRIFs), deferred profit sharing plans (DPSPs) and registered disability savings plans (RDSPs).

    Fair Treatment

    Filed under:
    Canada, Alberta, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Miller Thomson LLP, Tax exemption, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Beneficiary, Retirement, Life insurance, Investment funds, Disability, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Authors:
    Wendi P. Crowe
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Miller Thomson LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 2
    • Page 3
    • Page 4
    • Page 5
    • Page 6
    • Current page 7
    • Page 8
    • Page 9
    • Page 10
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days