Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York issues highly anticipated opinion discussing a debtor’s liability for post-petition rent during the first month of a bankruptcy case
    2009-01-12

    On December 18, 2008, in connection with the bankruptcy of the Steve & Barry’s retail chain, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York held that under Section 365(d)(3) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (the “Code”), landlords are entitled to pro-rata postpetition rental payments for the monthly “stub” period following the filing of the debtor-tenant’s bankruptcy petition provided that the debtor-tenant continues to enjoy the right to use and occupy the leased property.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Lowenstein Sandler LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Landlord, Leasehold estate, Pro rata, US Congress, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for the Southern District of New York
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Lowenstein Sandler LLP
    New decision requiring disclosures for informal committees in bankruptcy cases
    2009-12-14

    In a recent decision from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, Judge Mary Walrath has required that members of an informal committee of noteholders comply with expansive disclosure requirements beyond the standard established for official committees. In a written opinion issued on December 2, 2009 in the case of In re Washington Mutual, Inc., Case No. 08-12229 (MFW), Judge Walrath granted a motion to require an informal group of noteholders to comply with Rule 2019 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Lowenstein Sandler LLP, Bankruptcy, Interest, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of Delaware, US District Court for the Southern District of New York, US District Court for Southern District of Texas
    Authors:
    Sharon L. Levine , Sheila A. Sadighi , S. Jason Teele
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Lowenstein Sandler LLP
    Intercreditor agreements: cementing priorities and silencing objections
    2009-12-08

    Intercreditor Agreement in ION Media requires Second Lien Lenders “Be Silent” — precludes challenge to validity of liens; deprives junior creditors of standing to object to plan of reorganization.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Lowenstein Sandler LLP, Bankruptcy, Unsecured debt, Debt, Secured creditor, Secured loan, Federal Communications Commission (USA), United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Sharon L. Levine , Sheila A. Sadighi , Wojciech F. Jung , Andrew David Behlmann
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Lowenstein Sandler LLP
    Potential benefit to unsecured creditors from the Worker, Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act of 2009
    2009-12-28

    There is something for everyone in the suitably named Worker, Homeownership, and Business Assistance Act of 2009–including potential recoveries for unsecured creditors of a debtor reorganizing or liquidating pursuant to the United States Bankruptcy Code.

    Background

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Lowenstein Sandler LLP, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Interest, Taxable income, Debt, Liquidation, Tax return (USA), Troubled Asset Relief Program, Internal Revenue Service (USA), Title 11 of the US Code
    Authors:
    John L. Berger , Sharon L. Levine , Cassandra M. Porter
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Lowenstein Sandler LLP
    Pension plan termination premium claims may not be dischargeable in bankruptcy
    2009-12-21

    The Supreme Court declines to review a circuit court decision in Oneida Ltd., which held that a debtor cannot discharge in bankruptcy, as a prepetition claim, premiums it owes to the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation in connection with the termination of a pension plan.

    Introduction

    Filed under:
    USA, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Lowenstein Sandler LLP, Bankruptcy, Employee Retirement Income Security Act 1974 (USA), Debtor, Defined benefit pension plan, Bankruptcy discharge, Compound interest, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation, US Code, Title 11 of the US Code, Supreme Court of the United States, Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court, Circuit court
    Authors:
    Sharon L. Levine , Christine Osvald-Mruz , Wojciech F. Jung
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Lowenstein Sandler LLP
    Kelson Channelview LLC v. Reliant Energy Channelview LP
    2010-01-20

    The term “stalking horse” originally referred to a horse or type of screen a hunter used to conceal his position from intended prey. Today the term takes a new meaning altogether thanks to its application in the bankruptcy context. A modern day “stalking horse” is an interested buyer of a debtor’s assets who is offered incentives for being the first to announce its intent. As the initial bidder, the stalking horse sets the minimum purchase price and other terms of the transaction.

    Filed under:
    USA, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Lowenstein Sandler LLP, Debtor, Federal Reporter, Non-disclosure agreement, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    Sharon L. Levine , Sheila A. Sadighi , S. Jason Teele , Cassandra M. Porter
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Lowenstein Sandler LLP
    Non-exclusive engagement agreement and limited retention leads to denial of investment banker's fees in Chapter 11
    2010-01-27

    PETER J. SOLOMON COMPANY, L.P., v. ONEIDA, LTD., CASE NO. 09-CIV-2229, 2010 WL 234827 (S.D.N.Y. JAN. 22, 2010)

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Lowenstein Sandler LLP, Bankruptcy, Market liquidity, Debt, Investment banking, Limited partnership, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for the Southern District of New York
    Authors:
    Wojciech F. Jung , S. Jason Teele
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Lowenstein Sandler LLP
    When is a committee not a committee for Bankruptcy Rule 2019 purposes? Courts are split 3 to 3 and the debate continues
    2010-02-05

    Although 2010 is still young, the bankruptcy courts have been busy interpreting Rule 2019 of the Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure as it applies to ad hoc groups of creditors in bankruptcy cases. A ruling issued on February 4, 2010, in In re Philadelphia Newspapers, LL, Case No. 09- 11204 (Bankr. E.D.Pa.) found Rule 2019 does not apply to ad hoc groups. The score is now tied at three to three.

    Filed under:
    USA, Pennsylvania, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Lowenstein Sandler LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Adoption, US House Committee on Rules, Westlaw, Title 11 of the US Code, Delaware Supreme Court, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    S. Jason Teele , Sharon L. Levine , Cassandra M. Porter
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Lowenstein Sandler LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • Page 1
    • Page 2
    • Page 3
    • Current page 4
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days