Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Alberta Court of Appeal overturns lower court decision in Reid-Built
    2019-06-07

    In a 2018 judgment discussed here, the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench held that, by virtue of s.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Alberta, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Authors:
    Walker W. MacLeod
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Alberta Court of Appeal Confirms Superpriority for Receiver’s Fees and Costs
    2019-03-29

    In the recent decision of Edmonton (City) v Alvarez & Marsal Canada Inc., 2019 ABCA 109, the Alberta Court of Appeal has concluded that fees and costs incurred by a court-appointed receiver should have priority over all claims by secured creditors, including special liens in favour of municipalities for unpaid property taxes. This is an important decision for the insolvency bar and provides some much needed comfort to receivers that their fees and costs will be protected by the court-ordered charge.

    The Decision

    Filed under:
    Canada, Alberta, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada), Court of Appeal of Alberta
    Authors:
    Jack Maslen , Myles fish
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Borden Ladner Gervais LLP
    Bank allowed to allege fraud in second ‘Kick at the Can’
    2019-03-29

    When a plaintiff obtains a judgment from the court, that party is normally precluded from starting another lawsuit seeking the same judgment debt from the defendant.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Baker McKenzie, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Authors:
    Ben Sakamoto , Michael Nowina
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Baker McKenzie
    Clarity in Appeal Procedures Part II: The BIA Prevails - or Does It?
    2019-04-10

    In January, we wrote about a decision of Justice Watt of the Ontario Court of Appeal, which addressed the question of which appeal procedure must be followed in appeals of Orders made in proceedings constituted under both the Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (the “BIA”) and the

    Filed under:
    Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Aird & Berlis LLP | Aird & McBurney LP, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Authors:
    Steven L. Graff , Miranda Spence , Kyle Plunkett
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Aird & Berlis LLP | Aird & McBurney LP
    Blaney’s appeals: Ontario Court of Appeal Summaries (April 8 - 12, 2019)
    2019-04-12

    Good evening.

    Below are summaries of the civil decisions released by the Court of Appeal for Ontario this week.

    Filed under:
    Canada, USA, Ontario, Banking, Family, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Professional Negligence, Real Estate, Blaney McMurtry LLP, Freedom of information, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Authors:
    John Polyzogopoulos
    Location:
    Canada, USA
    Firm:
    Blaney McMurtry LLP
    (Not) So Long, Astoria: Only 10 Days to Appeal Orders in Receivership Proceedings
    2019-04-16

    In Business Development Bank of Canada v.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)
    Authors:
    Trevor A Courtis
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Galantis v Alexiou: No Oppression after Dissolution
    2019-04-18

    In Galantis v Alexious, [2019] UKPC 15 the Privy Council concluded that the oppression remedy existing under the Bahamian Companies Act cannot be invoked after the dissolution of a company, with respect to oppressive conduct by directors that occurred before the dissolution of the company.

    Filed under:
    Canada, United Kingdom, Quebec, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
    Authors:
    Richard Lizius
    Location:
    Canada, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    What's in a name? Priority issues under postponement, subordination and intercreditor agreements
    2019-04-29

    Two priority issues arise between creditors of a common debtor:

    Filed under:
    Canada, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Gowling WLG
    Authors:
    Mike Todd
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Gowling WLG
    Bankruptcy is not a licence to ignore rules: Redwater, insolvency, and Alberta's uncertain regulatory future
    2019-05-15

    For more than 70 years, the energy industry has been one of Alberta's primary economic engines. It is no secret, however, that large scale oil and natural gas development can have a detrimental impact on the environment if it is not properly managed. This interplay between risk and benefit creates complicated policy and regulatory tensions as exploration and production (E&P) companies become financially distressed. Most stakeholders benefit from responsible resource development, but their interests diverge when a company becomes insolvent.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Alberta, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer LLP, Alberta Energy Regulator
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Burnet, Duckworth & Palmer LLP
    Alberta Court of Appeal confirms municipal taxes on linear property constitute unsecured claims
    2019-05-15

    The Alberta Court of Appeal recently upheld an unreported decision of the Court of Queen’s Bench that unpaid taxes on linear property (which were pipelines and associated facilities in the case at bar) formed only unsecured claims against the debtors.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Alberta, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Tax, McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Authors:
    Walker W. MacLeod
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 726
    • Page 727
    • Page 728
    • Page 729
    • Current page 730
    • Page 731
    • Page 732
    • Page 733
    • Page 734
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days