A bankruptcy court gave “unnecessary and unlikely incorrect” reasoning to support its “excessively broad proposition that sales free and clear under [Bankruptcy Code (“Code”)] Section 363 override, and essentially render nugatory, the critical lessee protections against a debtor-lessor under [Code] 365(h),” said the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on Feb. 16, 2022. In re Royal Bistro, LLC, 2022 WL 499938, *1-*2 (5th Cir. Feb. 16, 2022).

30 декабря 2021 Федеральная налоговая служба опубликовала обзор судебной практики арбитражных судов по оспариванию сделок в процедуре банкротства[1].

В обзоре содержатся актуальная судебная практика арбитражных судов федеральных округов и Верховного Суда РФ, позиции из которой необходимо учитывать при оспаривании сделок в рамках банкротных процедур.

Court fees are rising again thanks to the Court Fees (Miscellaneous Amendment) Order 2021

CFO21 will mostly be amending and updating the fees listed in Schedule 1 of The Civil Proceedings Fees Order 2008. The justification for the increase is to account for historic inflation since the last significant round of fee increases in 2016.

Hotel Portfolio II UK Limited (In Liquidation) & Anor v Andrew Ruhan & Anthony Stevens [2022] EWHC 383 (Comm).

On February 19, 2020, Congress enacted the Small Business Reorganization Act (“SBRA”) to, among other things, streamline the chapter 11 bankruptcy process for a small business. Under the SBRA, a “small business” was one with less than $2,725,625.00 in debt. Few businesses, however, were eligible to take advantage of these new provisions because their debts exceeded the cap.

What's this Update about?

In the recent decision of the Malaysian High Court in Re Top Builders Capital Bhd & Ors [2022] MLJU 1 ("Top Builders"), Ong Chee Kwan JC reaffirmed certain principles for the sanction of a scheme of arrangement ("SOA") and also decided on some novel issues:-

R (on the application of Palmer) v Northern Derbyshire Magistrates’ Court [2021] EWHC 3013

The case of Palmer has confirmed that an insolvency practitioner in the role of an administrator can be prosecuted (and therefore personally liable) for a failure to follow correct redundancy procedures prescribed by s194 TULRCA.

Where an individual is found to have acted in breach of s194, they may be personally liable to an unlimited fine (or a fine of up to £5,000 if the offence is committed before 12 March 2015).

The facts

Chris Corbin and Jeremy King, part owners of the company that owns the famous Wolseley restaurant had their company pushed into administration by its co-owner and major lender, having been in default since 2020, and now owes £38m. Administration might not have come as a surprise to anyone in that case.

However, directors and shareholders will not usually get anything like as much notice of a lender’s intention to appoint administrators and will frequently get none at all, as  Insolvency and Asset Recovery Partner Tim Symes explains here.

Over the past decade, there have been several court decisions on whether particular make-whole premiums should be allowed as part of a creditor's claim in bankruptcy, such as Momentive,¹ EFH,² American Airlines,³ and Ultra Petroleum.⁴ Although these decisions and others set forth the legal standards to be applied and resolved the specific claims at issue, the decisions provide little guidance or clarity on the allowability of make-whole claims in future cases.

Im Browser ansehen Im Browser ansehen

Februar 2022

Februar 2022

NFFeebbrruueaarrw22002222sletteNr eRwuslselattnedr Russland tteINNrneesRowwulvsssellsneezlattattnneefIderrncshRRotuuulvnssegssn:zllRaaaennncfddehctshpturencgh:uRnegcshtbsperseicchhutngsbe

0a2n1fI2I22ennc000ssh111oot999ullvvneegnn222:zz000Raa222enn111cff2eehcc0tshh1ptt9uurenncgg2h::0uRR2nee1gccshhttbsspperrrseeiccchhhuutnnggssbbeerrssiicchhtt

Englische Version Russische Version

Englische Version

Russische Version Englische Version REunsgsliisscchhee VVeerrssiioonn Russische Version