Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Civil Fraud Quarterly Round-Up: Q3 2018
    2018-10-11

    Unlawful Means Conspiracy

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, England, Wales, Arbitration & ADR, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Legal Practice, Litigation, White Collar Crime, Kingsley Napley, Bribery, Barclays, Deutsche Bank, Serious Fraud Office (UK), Deloitte, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Mary Young
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Kingsley Napley
    Ambey Capital Private Ltd & Ors v Mascarenhas & Ors (2018)
    2018-10-12

    Ashfords successfully acted for the Joint Trustees in Bankruptcy of Vincent Mascarenhas (deceased) in their application to discharge Freezing Orders, an Interim Charging Order and an Interim Third Party Debt Order obtained by creditors of the late Bankrupt in 2014. The Joint Trustees were not a party to the original proceedings but had standing to make the applications.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Ashfords LLP, Bankruptcy, Interim order, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Olivia Bridger
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Ashfords LLP
    Don’t be taken by surprise by insolvency proceedings - lessons from Patisserie Valerie
    2018-10-15

    It’s been reported that the board of directors of AIM-listed Patisserie Holdings plc, which owns the Patisserie Valerie chain of cafés, was not aware for almost a month that HMRC had filed a petition at the High Court of England and Wales to wind up its main trading subsidiary, Stonebeach Limited.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Scotland, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Brodies LLP, Board of directors, Dispute resolution, Liquidation, HM Revenue and Customs (UK), Court of Session
    Authors:
    Fiona Chute
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Brodies LLP
    When the shoe does not fit: direct action clauses - can investors step into the Trustee’s shoes to enforce?
    2018-10-16

    A recent High Court case (Fairhold Securitisation Limited v Clifden IOM No 1 Ltd) has affirmed that in debt issuances involving a trustee, noteholders have only limited rights to take direct enforcement action. The case confirmed that:

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Hogan Lovells, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Kit Johnson , Andrew Carey , Jill Barraclough , Megan James
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Hogan Lovells
    Finance, Insolvency/Restructuring Update: Standish v Royal Bank of Scotland
    2018-09-19

    Introduction

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Rosling King LLP
    Authors:
    Alexander Pelopidas
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Rosling King LLP
    Pre-liquidation environmental clean-up liability held to be an expense of the liquidation
    2018-09-25

    A statutory waste removal obligation incurred by a company before it entered liquidation was held to be dischargeable as an expense of the liquidation (Re Doonin Plant Limited [2018] ScotCS CSOH 89).

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Environment & Climate Change, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, TLT LLP, Environmental Protection Act 1990 (UK)
    Authors:
    Alan Munro
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    TLT LLP
    High Court warns directors to get match fit for new reporting regulations
    2018-09-25

    Introduction

    Directors should seek advice from in-house or external legal professionals whenever executing documents, even if they believe that they understand the consequences of what they are signing. They should also record their decision-making process to ensure that they comply with the Companies (Miscellaneous Reporting) Regulations 2018. Wessely v White serves as a timely warning in this regard.(1)

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Company & Commercial, Construction, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, RPC, Companies Act 2006 (UK)
    Authors:
    Geraldine Elliott , Matthew Evans
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    RPC
    Contempt and committal - powerful weapons against arbitration debtors
    2018-09-27

    Obtaining a favourable arbitration award often proves to be only half of the battle. Facing obstructive counterparties refusing to honour awards, often based in jurisdictions where enforcement is slow, difficult and uncertain, is a source of regular frustration to those pursuing claims in arbitration. That is why anyone involved in international trade should be familiar with the variety of measures available to enforce their awards.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Arbitration & ADR, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP
    Authors:
    Vassia Payiataki , Andrew Meads , Bartek Rutkowski
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    SHB Realisations Limited (in Liquidation [2018] EWHC 402 (Ch)
    2018-09-28

    The Facts

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Ashfords LLP, High Court of Justice (England & Wales)
    Authors:
    Connor Pierce
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Ashfords LLP
    Harriet Lock -v- Aylesbury Vale District Council [2018] EWHC 2015 (Ch)
    2018-09-28

    The Facts

    Following a statutory demand for unpaid council tax in the sum of £8,067, a bankruptcy petition was presented against Ms Harriet Lock. The council provided Ms Lock with evidence of the council tax liability orders confirming the debt. Ms Lock provided evidence in response, which explained that she was living in social housing and was financially dependent on her daughter. At a first hearing, the court adjourned and ordered that Ms Lock provide a skeleton argument to explain why a bankruptcy order should not be made.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Ashfords LLP, Bankruptcy, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK), High Court of Justice (England & Wales)
    Authors:
    Cathryn Butler
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Ashfords LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 1543
    • Page 1544
    • Page 1545
    • Page 1546
    • Current page 1547
    • Page 1548
    • Page 1549
    • Page 1550
    • Page 1551
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days