We reported on the first instance decision in this litigation last year (see here). The New South Wales Court of Appeal recently delivered judgment on the liquidators' appeal.
Registration will be mandatory under the Insolvency Practitioners Bill as reported back to the House by the Commerce Committee. This is a radical and far-reaching change from the negative licensing regime initially proposed in the Bill.
This Brief Counsel summarises and comments on the Committee’s report.
This FYI outlines the things you need to know about the Insolvency Practitioners Bill in its latest form. You can follow this link to access the Bill on the New Zealand legislation website. The Bill is new legislation that seeks to improve the regulation of administrators, liquidators, and receivers. It proposes amendments to the Companies Act 1993 and the Receiverships Act 1993.
It is not uncommon for a receiver, liquidator or competing creditor to be presented with a security agreement, the ink on which appears scarcely to be dry.
If that secured creditor registered on the Personal Property Securities Register (PPSR) months or years earlier, does that registration date determine priority between competing security interests? Or is that unfair to other creditors?
A liquidator may assign to a third party funder, among other things:
- the rights that are conferred on the liquidator under statute to bring a claim on behalf of the company. For example, rights accruing to the liquidator under the voidable transaction provisions of the Companies Act 1993
- a company's rights that exist at the time of liquidation.
In Katavich v Meltzer & Ors, the court confirmed that pursuant to ss 284 and 321 of the Companies Act 1993 (Act), liquidators can be removed notwithstanding that their final report has been filed and the company is to be struck off the Register.
A recent decision confirms that liquidators can require creditors and other persons with relevant knowledge about the affairs of the company in liquidation to provide information.
Case law on the new insolvent transactions regime is scarce, even though the changes were introduced three years ago. The High Court's recent decision in Blanchett v McEntee Hire Holdings Limited examines, for the first time in New Zealand, central principles in the new voidable transactions regime.
Sultani Decrees
Sultani Decree No. 43/2012
Amends some of the provisions of the Municipal Councils Law promulgated by SD 116/2011.
Promulgated on 8 August 2012 Effective on promulgation.
Ministerial Decisions and Financial Publications
Ministry of Agriculture and Fisheries
Decision No. 177/2012
Sultani Decrees
Sultani Decree No. 2/2013
Establishes the National Defence College and issues its by-laws.
Promulgated on 8 January 2013 Effective from day following publication
Sultani Decree No. 3/2013
Establishes the Public Authority for Civil Defence and Emergency Services.
Promulgated on 8 January 2013 Effective from day following publication
Sultani Decree No. 4/2013