Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Adequate assurance under section 2-609 of the Uniform Commercial Code upon a customer’s bankruptcy filing
    2009-09-10

    As the automotive industry continues to restructure, whether through self-liquidation or government intervention, suppliers will inevitably be confronted with many of the same issues prevalent 4-5 years ago, including a supplier’s obligation to continue to provide goods post-petition and the supplier’s rights to adequate assurance as a condition to such shipment.

    Filed under:
    USA, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Barnes & Thornburg LLP, Bankruptcy, Credit (finance), Debtor, Collateral (finance), Liquidation, Debtor in possession, Title 11 of the US Code, Uniform Commercial Code (USA)
    Authors:
    John T. Gregg
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Barnes & Thornburg LLP
    Reliance Insurance receives court approval of liquidation settlement agreement
    2009-09-09

    Reliance Insurance Company, which had consented to the entry of an Order of Rehabilitation by the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania on May 29, 2001, and which was ordered by the court into liquidation on October 3, 2001, reached a Commutation, Settlement Agreement, and Release with its reinsurer, Munich Reinsurance America. The Settlement Agreement is dated December 29, 2008.

    Filed under:
    USA, Pennsylvania, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Jorden Burt LLP, Reinsurance, Liquidation, Liquidator (law), Insurance commissioner, Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
    Authors:
    Brian Perryman
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jorden Burt LLP
    R&R Capital, LLC v. Merritt
    2009-09-03

    C.A. No. 3989-CC (Del. Ch. Sept. 3, 2009)

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White Collar Crime, Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP, Fraud, Res judicata and issue estoppel, Liquidation, Estoppel, Embezzlement, Gross negligence, Collateral estoppel, Court of Chancery, Delaware Court of Chancery, Delaware Supreme Court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Potter Anderson & Corroon LLP
    Chrysler and GM: courts extend law on sales, recharacterization
    2009-09-30

    Earlier this year, Courts from the Bankruptcy Courts for the Southern District of New York to the United States Supreme Court issued a number of rulings approving the asset sales by Chrysler and General Motors. Although popular and industry media have been replete with stories regarding the facts of these cases, this article provides an in-depth analysis of the Courts’ rulings on several key issues of interest to debtors and creditors in future bankruptcies.

    Summary of Key Rulings

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Liquidation, Bridge loan, US Department of the Treasury, United Automobile Workers, General Motors, Chrysler, Supreme Court of the United States, Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
    Lehman bankruptcy court rules on right to withhold payment under ISDA Master Agreement
    2009-09-29

    On September 17, 2009, the U.S.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP, Bankruptcy, Condition precedent, Debtor, Safe harbor (law), Swap (finance), Liquidation, Default (finance), Leverage (finance), American International Group, Lehman Brothers, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP
    Bankruptcy court orders swap counterparty to pay Lehman Brothers despite event of default
    2009-09-25

    The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York entered an order on Sept. 17, 2009, granting a motion filed by Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc. (“LBSF”) to compel Metavante Corporation (“Metavante”) to continue to make payments to LBSF under an ISDA Master Agreement.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Bankruptcy, Condition precedent, Debtor, Safe harbor (law), Interest, Swap (finance), Motion to compel, Liquidation, Default (finance), US Congress, Lehman Brothers, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Lawrence V. Gelber , Craig Stein , Kristin Boggiano
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Bankruptcy court prohibits counterparty's suspension of payments to Lehman under open derivative contract
    2009-10-06

    In a significant decision recently handed down in the Lehman bankruptcy case, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York held that a non-defaulting counterparty acted improperly by suspending payments under an open derivative contract with Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc. ("LBSF").

    Filed under:
    USA, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Venable LLP, Bankruptcy, Condition precedent, Libor, Debtor, Safe harbor (law), Interest, Swap (finance), Liquidation, Default (finance), Lehman Brothers, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Venable LLP
    Employee incentive plans - navigating the restrictions of § 503(c)
    2009-10-01

    The Bankruptcy Abuse and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (BAPCPA) purported to eliminate the ability of chapter 11 debtors in possession to pay bonuses to management through Key Employee Retention Plans. However, in recognition of the fact that a real need often exists to incentivize key employees to remain with a reorganizing or liquidating business, bankruptcy courts have approved incentive plans providing for payments to insiders and other employees. Such plans must be carefully crafted to avoid the restrictions on retention bonuses post-BAPCPA.

    Filed under:
    USA, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Wiley Rein LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Consumer protection, General counsel, Liquidation, Business judgement rule, Benchmarking, Severance package, US Senate, Chief executive officer, Chief financial officer, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Dylan G. Trache
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Wiley Rein LLP
    363 asset sales: the latest restructuring tool
    2009-10-01

    Introduction

    The dearth of credit available for companies in financial distress means an asset sale may be the only way to save the business and jobs. It also presents unusually attractive investment opportunities for public and private companies, private equity and hedge funds, and other investors with capital and an ability to move expeditiously.

    Filed under:
    USA, Corporate Finance/M&A, Insolvency & Restructuring, Greenberg Traurig LLP, Bankruptcy, Credit (finance), Debtor, Private equity, Privately held company, Hedge funds, Investment banking, Liability (financial accounting), Liquidation, Due diligence, Conveyancing, Secured loan, General Motors, Title 11 of the US Code, Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Greenberg Traurig LLP
    Bankruptcy can upend the asset protection benefits of the LLC
    2009-10-01

    The limited liability company is widely used as the business entity of choice for a number of reasons, including its asset protection benefits. If a creditor of an LLC member attempts to seize the LLC member's interest (or the assets of the LLC for that matter), the creditor will have to deal with the charging order roadblock.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Stinson LLP, Bankruptcy, Legal personality, Debtor, Interest, Limited liability company, Option (finance), Liquidation, Asset protection, Dissolution (law)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Stinson LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 192
    • Page 193
    • Page 194
    • Page 195
    • Current page 196
    • Page 197
    • Page 198
    • Page 199
    • Page 200
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days