Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Bankruptcy Court sets deadline for filing claims against Lehman debtors
    2009-07-07

    The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, overseeing the bankruptcy cases of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and its affiliated debtors (collectively, the “Debtors”), entered an order on July 2, 2009 (the “Bar Date Order”), establishing September 22, 2009, at 5:00 p.m. (Eastern Time) as the deadline for the filing of claims against the Debtors (the “Bar Date”).

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Lehman Brothers, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Weathering the storm: the appointment of an examiner
    2009-07-01

    With the economic crisis leading to the failure of many businesses, bankruptcy cases are on the rise. In many of the cases grabbing headlines, such as Lehman Brothers, Nellson Nutraceutical, New Century and SemCrude, courts have shown a willingness to appoint examiners to investigate, report on and make recommendations regarding possible issues of mismanagement, fraud or other improprieties relating to the affairs of the debtor or its former or current management.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Haynes and Boone LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Fraud, Interest, Liability (financial accounting), Witness, Subpoena, Debtor in possession, Lehman Brothers, Enron, US Code, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for the Southern District of New York
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Haynes and Boone LLP
    Deadline established to assert claims against Lehman Brothers
    2009-07-10

    The court overseeing the chapter 11 bankruptcy cases of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. and various subsidiaries (the “Debtors”), has entered an order establishing deadlines and procedures for filing claims against the Debtors. In terms of procedural requirements, the order places unusual burdens on parties whose claims are based on derivative contracts and guarantees.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Valuation (finance), Lehman Brothers, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
    Lehman Brothers bar date order
    2009-07-20

    Summary

    This briefing summarizes the recent U.S. Bankruptcy Court order establishing bar dates for creditors filing claims in relation to debts owed to them by Lehman Brothers entities in Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings. Specifically, this briefing discusses who must file a proof of claim, how to file the proof of claim, and the special requirements for claims in respect of derivative contracts, guarantees and Lehman program securities.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Bond (finance), Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Debtor, Security (finance), Option (finance), Debt, Liability (financial accounting), Warrant (finance), Lehman Brothers, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Richard Perks
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer
    Bankruptcy court sets September 22, 2009 as deadline to file proofs of claims against Lehman Brothers
    2009-08-12

    On July 2, 2009 the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York issued an order establishing September 22, 2009 as the deadline for filing proofs of claims against Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. or any of its debtor affiliates (the “Order”). The Order provides that any holder of a claim against the Debtors who fails to file a proof of claim before the September 22, 2009 deadline will be forever barred from asserting such claim thereafter.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Foley Hoag LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Security (finance), Lehman Brothers, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Jeffrey D. Collins , Creighton K. Page
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Foley Hoag LLP
    Litigation challenges counterparty right to withhold payments under Section 2(a)(iii) of ISDA Master Agreement as violation of automatic stay provisions of US Bankruptcy Code
    2009-08-11

    In a recently filed motion in the United States Bankruptcy Court Southern District of New York (the “Motion”), Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. (“LBHI”) is seeking to compel Metavante Corporation (“Metavante”) to perform its obligations under a swap agreement between Metavante and Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP, Bankruptcy, Condition precedent, Libor, Debtor, Safe harbor (law), Interest, Swap (finance), Liquidation, Default (finance), Lehman Brothers, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
    Lehman bankruptcy court holds ISDA swap counterparty in violation of automatic stay/counterparty seeks modification
    2009-09-29

    In a recent ruling from the bench, Judge James M. Peck of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York held that Metavante Corporation’s suspension of payments under an outstanding swap agreement with Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP, Bankruptcy, Condition precedent, Debtor, Safe harbor (law), Swap (finance), Default (finance), Systemic risk, International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Lehman Brothers, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Mark C. Ellenberg
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft LLP
    Lehman bankruptcy court rules on right to withhold payment under ISDA Master Agreement
    2009-09-29

    On September 17, 2009, the U.S.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP, Bankruptcy, Condition precedent, Debtor, Safe harbor (law), Swap (finance), Liquidation, Default (finance), Leverage (finance), American International Group, Lehman Brothers, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP
    Bankruptcy court orders swap counterparty to pay Lehman Brothers despite event of default
    2009-09-25

    The United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York entered an order on Sept. 17, 2009, granting a motion filed by Lehman Brothers Special Financing Inc. (“LBSF”) to compel Metavante Corporation (“Metavante”) to continue to make payments to LBSF under an ISDA Master Agreement.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Bankruptcy, Condition precedent, Debtor, Safe harbor (law), Interest, Swap (finance), Motion to compel, Liquidation, Default (finance), US Congress, Lehman Brothers, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Lawrence V. Gelber , Craig Stein , Kristin Boggiano
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    US Bankruptcy Court finds that payment conditionality is unenforceabe under Section 2 (a) (iii) of the ISDA Master Agreement
    2009-09-24

    The judge responsible for the Lehman bankruptcy proceedings in the United States has found that the provisions of the US bankruptcy code that exempt swap agreements and master netting agreements from the application of the Code's automatic stay and other relevant provisions do not permit a party to an ISDA Master Agreement to suspend performance under Section 2 (a) (iii) of the master agreement.

    Filed under:
    USA, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer, Bankruptcy, Swap (finance), Lehman Brothers
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 29
    • Page 30
    • Page 31
    • Page 32
    • Current page 33
    • Page 34
    • Page 35
    • Page 36
    • Page 37
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days