Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Seventh Circuit hears lenders’ shout “Give me credit, will ya!”
    2011-08-03

    The Bottom Line:

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Credit (finance), Secured loan, United States bankruptcy court, Seventh Circuit
    Authors:
    Rachael Ringer
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    The Enron claims trading decision: everyone loses
    2007-10-04

    On August 27, 2007, United States District Judge Shira Scheindlin held that Springfield Associates, an innocent transferee of a claim from Citigroup against Enron, was not subject to certain counterclaims and defenses so long as Springfield was a “purchaser” and not an “assignee” of the claim. See In re Enron Corp. v. Springfield Assocs. L.L.C., No. 07 Civ. 1957, 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63129 (S.D.N.Y. Aug. 27, 2007).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Debtor, Swap (finance), Remand (court procedure), Warranty, Distressed securities, Uniform Commercial Code (USA), US Congress, Citigroup, Enron, US District Court for SDNY
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Court Sides With Minority View Concluding Intervention Under Section 1109(b) Does Not Apply to Adversary Proceedings
    2022-06-27

    Overview

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Authors:
    Kelly E. Porcelli
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Tenth Circuit Holds the Doctrine of Equitable Mootness Applies to Liquidating Plans
    2020-08-18

    The Bottom Line

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Title 11 of the US Code, Tenth Circuit
    Authors:
    Benjamin S. Sieck
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    US Supreme Court Gives the Final Word: Denial of Lift Stay Motions Are Final and Immediately Appealable
    2020-02-11

    The Bottom Line

    The United States Supreme Court recently issued a unanimous decision in Ritzen Group, Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLC, No. 19-938 589 U.S. __ (2020), which held that a bankruptcy court’s unreserved denial of a motion for relief from the automatic stay is a final, immediately appealable order within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. 158.

    What Happened

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, SCOTUS
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    ILPA Releases Guidance on General Partner-Led Secondary Fund Restructurings
    2019-06-03

    In response to the increasing prevalence of general partner (GP)-led secondary fund restructurings, the Institutional Limited Partners Association (ILPA) has released guidance regarding this practice. The purpose of this guidance is to promote transparency and efficiency in the secondary process.

    The ILPA has defined these restructurings as transactions that offer one of the following:

    Filed under:
    USA, Capital Markets, Corporate Finance/M&A, Insolvency & Restructuring, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Employee Retirement Income Security Act 1974 (USA), Private equity, Limited partnership, Due diligence, Investment funds
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Fourth Circuit Upholds Requirement That Appellant Have an Economic Stake in Outcome of Appeal to Be a ‘Person Aggrieved’ and Boots Moot Appeal Too
    2018-09-24

    The Bottom Line

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Fourth Circuit
    Authors:
    Nathaniel Allard
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Opportunistic CDS Strategies Available to CDS Protection Sellers Part II: McClatchy and Sears
    2018-06-06

    In the first article of this two-part series on sell-side opportunistic engineering in the CDS market, we surveyed a number of strategies that could be used by sellers of CDS protection to create sell-side gains. In this second part, we analyze two recent situations where a proposed refinancing dramatically affected the CDS market for the reference entity because of the reduction in the sell-side risk. Although these cases may or may not have been driven by CDS considerations, they illustrate how sell-side CDS strategies may be effectively implemented.

    Filed under:
    USA, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Credit default swap
    Authors:
    Fabien Carruzzo , Stephen D. Zide , Daniel King
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Fifth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Claims Relating to Pre-Petition Payments to D&O’s
    2017-11-30

    The Bottom Line

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Fifth Circuit, US District Court for Southern District of Texas
    Authors:
    Andrew Wyatt Pollack
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Challenging Indenture Reserves
    2017-07-31

    Indentures and other agreements governing complex, multitiered structured debt products will typically contain a series of reserves, the adequacy of whose funding will take precedence over payments to noteholders. While the funding requirements of the reserve accounts will be set forth in the agreement, the formulation of these provisions will leave administrators considerable leeway in determining the cash maintenance levels appropriate for the various accounts. In a recent case, UMB National Association v. Airplanes Limited (S.D.N.Y.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Authors:
    Abbe L. Dienstag
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 29
    • Page 30
    • Page 31
    • Page 32
    • Current page 33
    • Page 34
    • Page 35
    • Page 36
    • Page 37
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days